Page 5 of 16 FirstFirst ... 3456715 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 154

Thread: The Triumph of Super PACs

  1. #41

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tgo01 View Post
    Well? ARE THEY EQUAL?!

    What helps more, someone going door to door shouting how great Candidate Yes is and standing on street corners encouraging them and helping them register to vote or some commercial on the television that no one is even going to watch? Seriously, who watches commercials anymore?
    You can buy a thousand people to go door to door for that money.
    Quote Originally Posted by Nachos DLC View Post
    Blame Kranar!


    Protect Net Neutrality!
    https://www.dearfcc.org

  2. #42

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gelston View Post
    OH yeah, such an awesome dude. He'll have all the money he could ever need and when he dies it'll go into a charity so he won't be missing any of it.
    Yeah, what a dick. It should go to his kids like true aristocracy.
    Quote Originally Posted by Nachos DLC View Post
    Blame Kranar!


    Protect Net Neutrality!
    https://www.dearfcc.org

  3. #43

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by waywardgs View Post
    You can buy a thousand people to go door to door for that money.
    And if Candidate A manages to get thousands of people to do it for free is it wrong that Candidate B hires people to do it?

  4. #44

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tgo01 View Post
    And if Candidate A manages to get thousands of people to do it for free is it wrong that Candidate B hires people to do it?
    You can tell me the answer to that question. I'm certain you can.
    Quote Originally Posted by Nachos DLC View Post
    Blame Kranar!


    Protect Net Neutrality!
    https://www.dearfcc.org

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    34,085
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by waywardgs View Post
    Yeah, what a dick. It should go to his kids like true aristocracy.
    Actually, they only have 95% of their wealth promised. They have that other 5% for their kids. Which is still a shit ton of money.

    (3.9b to split between their three kids.)
    Last edited by Gelston; 04-23-2015 at 12:43 AM.
    Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

  6. #46

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by waywardgs View Post
    You can tell me the answer to that question. I'm certain you can.
    The answer is no.

  7. #47

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gelston View Post
    Actually, they only have 95% of their wealth promised. They have that other 5% for their kids. Which is still a shit ton of money.
    10 mill to each, from what I understand. Nothing to shake a stick at, but not 100 billion. That's an enormous amount of charitable money that should be going to his children.
    Last edited by waywardgs; 04-23-2015 at 12:42 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Nachos DLC View Post
    Blame Kranar!


    Protect Net Neutrality!
    https://www.dearfcc.org

  8. #48

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tgo01 View Post
    The answer is no.
    The answer is you're a sucka.
    Quote Originally Posted by Nachos DLC View Post
    Blame Kranar!


    Protect Net Neutrality!
    https://www.dearfcc.org

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    34,085
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by waywardgs View Post
    10 mill to each, from what I understand. Nothing to shake a stick at, but not 100 billion. That's an enormous amount of charitable money that should be going to his children.
    Well, 5% of their total fortune is 3.9 billion. That isn't pledged to anything currently, but still, I imagine their children are making enough money on their own. Also, this money isn't until after their death. It isn't like they are bending over backwards here.

    So, OMG they give so much money!!! I would too if I had billions of dollars and everything I could ever want.
    Last edited by Gelston; 04-23-2015 at 12:45 AM.
    Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

  10. #50

    Default

    Let's put it this way, TGO. Do you feel ok knowing that your vote is worth less because someone else can buy votes that make yours insignificant?

    Assuming you're not a billionaire, that is. Which is a safe assumption.
    Quote Originally Posted by Nachos DLC View Post
    Blame Kranar!


    Protect Net Neutrality!
    https://www.dearfcc.org

Similar Threads

  1. IRS Going After Super PACs?
    By ClydeR in forum Politics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-12-2012, 02:46 AM
  2. Europe's Triumph Over Obama
    By ClydeR in forum Politics
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-05-2010, 01:06 PM
  3. Triumph Music Video
    By Bobmuhthol in forum Off-Topic
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-30-2003, 02:22 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •