Page 2 of 212 FirstFirst 12341252102 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 2111

Thread: Clinton Emails

  1. #11
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    8,035

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Parkbandit View Post
    I think it's a bigger deal than what it's being made in the MSM, but I agree.. won't matter in the slightest. I am surprised by the outrage from some on the left.. clearly they are hoping it hurts Clinton enough for someone else to run.
    Here is the thing. The dems HAVE no one else to run. They are all in on Hillary, so they HAVE to fight tooth and nail to keep her viable.

    BUT... if she did.. (and she likely didbut may be hard to ~prove~) keep emails from the Benghazi committees. It's a felony, and would eliminate her from ever holding public office again.


    You got to ask yourself this tho...

    Do you REALLY want someone that knowingly violates the law (likely because she didn't want someone else having access to all her emails) and doesn't care?

    I mean.. she had a Clinton Foundation Staffer go through her Secretary of State emails to decide which were "valid" and not.

    A staffer of her Foundation... viewing some of the most important emails we have... wtf is up with that?

    And NO ONE in the entire administration knew she was using a private email for all this? Bullshit. You would think SOMEONE at some point was like... "Why am I sending top secret data to Hilliaryforpres@hotmail.com?" (made up email)
    This space for sale.

    Quote Originally Posted by Back View Post
    We have to count our blessings that we enjoy freedom of speech without fear of oppression in this county.
    (When you can't answer a question for fear of making you or your savior look bad)

  2. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarvan View Post
    Here is the thing. The dems HAVE no one else to run. They are all in on Hillary, so they HAVE to fight tooth and nail to keep her viable.
    O'Malley from MD looks like he might be getting ready to challenge... and if there is one thing Elizabeth Warren loves.. it's herself. If this hurts Clinton enough, she'll jump in as a "savior" and really show people what a 1/32nd American Indian can do.

    BUT... if she did.. (and she likely didbut may be hard to ~prove~) keep emails from the Benghazi committees. It's a felony, and would eliminate her from ever holding public office again.
    One things politicians do... they protect each other. Even if she did commit a felony, no charges will be brought against her and she'll never have to actually answer for what she did. She's as dirty as her husband, but they always come out smelling clean-ish. Nothing will stick to her... except maybe her pantsuit.

    You got to ask yourself this tho...

    Do you REALLY want someone that knowingly violates the law (likely because she didn't want someone else having access to all her emails) and doesn't care?

    I mean.. she had a Clinton Foundation Staffer go through her Secretary of State emails to decide which were "valid" and not.

    A staffer of her Foundation... viewing some of the most important emails we have... wtf is up with that?

    And NO ONE in the entire administration knew she was using a private email for all this? Bullshit. You would think SOMEONE at some point was like... "Why am I sending top secret data to Hilliaryforpres@hotmail.com?" (made up email)
    The real reason she did this was to have complete and total control over what emails are released and which ones aren't. There's no other explanation really. She wants to control her image, her time as SoS and bury all the dirt in a server in her basement that will suddenly explode, losing that data forever... ala IRS.
    PC RETARD HALL OF FAME

    Quote Originally Posted by Seran-the Current Retard Champion View Post
    Besides, Republicans also block abstinence and contraceptives anyway.
    Quote Originally Posted by Seran-the Current Retard Champion View Post
    Regulating firearms to keep them out of the hands of criminals, the unhinged, etc. meets the first test of the 2nd amendment, 'well-regulated'.

    Quote Originally Posted by SHAFT View Post
    You show me a video of me typing that and Ill admit it. (This was the excuse he came up with when he was called out for a really stupid post)
    Quote Originally Posted by Back View Post
    3 million more popular votes. I'd say the numbers speak for themselves. Gerrymandering won for Trump.

  3. #13

    Default

    O'Malley is going for Senate. Warren has many of the same issues Ron Paul did. Hillary would slaughter her and I think she knows it. Much better for her to stay in Congress.
    Last edited by Warriorbird; 03-05-2015 at 10:54 AM.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    8,035

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Warriorbird View Post
    O'Malley is going for Senate. Warren has many of the same issues Ron Paul did. Hillary would slaughter her and I think she knows it. Much better for her to stay in Congress.
    Like I said.. if Not Hillary, then who. If something were to happen to Hillary to make it she couldn't run... I think the Dems would practically give up hope for 2016.
    This space for sale.

    Quote Originally Posted by Back View Post
    We have to count our blessings that we enjoy freedom of speech without fear of oppression in this county.
    (When you can't answer a question for fear of making you or your savior look bad)

  5. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Warriorbird View Post
    O'Malley is going for Senate.
    From the horse's mouth: "I am hopeful and confident that very capable public servants with a desire to serve in the Senate will step up as candidates for this important office,” the former governor said Tuesday, in a statement. “I will not be one of them."

    Warren has many of the same issues Ron Paul did. Hillary would slaughter her and I think she knows it. Much better for her to stay in Congress.
    I agree (not the stay in Congress part... she's a crackpot who gamed the system to step over more deserving minorities).. but if there's one thing Warren is.. it's ambitious.
    Last edited by Parkbandit; 03-05-2015 at 11:09 AM.
    PC RETARD HALL OF FAME

    Quote Originally Posted by Seran-the Current Retard Champion View Post
    Besides, Republicans also block abstinence and contraceptives anyway.
    Quote Originally Posted by Seran-the Current Retard Champion View Post
    Regulating firearms to keep them out of the hands of criminals, the unhinged, etc. meets the first test of the 2nd amendment, 'well-regulated'.

    Quote Originally Posted by SHAFT View Post
    You show me a video of me typing that and Ill admit it. (This was the excuse he came up with when he was called out for a really stupid post)
    Quote Originally Posted by Back View Post
    3 million more popular votes. I'd say the numbers speak for themselves. Gerrymandering won for Trump.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    A Corporate Republic
    Posts
    12,640

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarvan View Post
    Here is the thing. The dems HAVE no one else to run. They are all in on Hillary, so they HAVE to fight tooth and nail to keep her viable.

    BUT... if she did.. (and she likely didbut may be hard to ~prove~) keep emails from the Benghazi committees. It's a felony, and would eliminate her from ever holding public office again.


    You got to ask yourself this tho...

    Do you REALLY want someone that knowingly violates the law (likely because she didn't want someone else having access to all her emails) and doesn't care?

    I mean.. she had a Clinton Foundation Staffer go through her Secretary of State emails to decide which were "valid" and not.

    A staffer of her Foundation... viewing some of the most important emails we have... wtf is up with that?

    And NO ONE in the entire administration knew she was using a private email for all this? Bullshit. You would think SOMEONE at some point was like... "Why am I sending top secret data to Hilliaryforpres@hotmail.com?" (made up email)
    They'd be better off with another talented young orator of a minority race or female gender. Both, if possible. Clinton has way too much political baggage at this point to be a viable candidate imo.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    8,035

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wrathbringer View Post
    They'd be better off with another talented young orator of a minority race or female gender. Both, if possible. Clinton has way too much political baggage at this point to be a viable candidate imo.
    I am waiting for Obama to endorse someone else. Likely a male. Michelle Obama has aspirations. I think it's likely they want Michelle to be the first woman President.
    This space for sale.

    Quote Originally Posted by Back View Post
    We have to count our blessings that we enjoy freedom of speech without fear of oppression in this county.
    (When you can't answer a question for fear of making you or your savior look bad)

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    A Corporate Republic
    Posts
    12,640

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarvan View Post
    I am waiting for Obama to endorse someone else. Likely a male. Michelle Obama has aspirations. I think it's likely they want Michelle to be the first woman President.
    Michelle Obama would make a great president...









    ...FOR ME TO POOP ON!!!!

  9. #19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarvan View Post
    I am waiting for Obama to endorse someone else. Likely a male. Michelle Obama has aspirations. I think it's likely they want Michelle to be the first woman President.
    Yea, the Obama Administration doesn't particularly like the Clintons and won't go out of their way to endorse her. I'm actually surprised that he hasn't endorsed Biden yet..
    PC RETARD HALL OF FAME

    Quote Originally Posted by Seran-the Current Retard Champion View Post
    Besides, Republicans also block abstinence and contraceptives anyway.
    Quote Originally Posted by Seran-the Current Retard Champion View Post
    Regulating firearms to keep them out of the hands of criminals, the unhinged, etc. meets the first test of the 2nd amendment, 'well-regulated'.

    Quote Originally Posted by SHAFT View Post
    You show me a video of me typing that and Ill admit it. (This was the excuse he came up with when he was called out for a really stupid post)
    Quote Originally Posted by Back View Post
    3 million more popular votes. I'd say the numbers speak for themselves. Gerrymandering won for Trump.

  10. #20

    Default

    I wish we'd seriously consider Jim Webb. Sadly I don't believe he has a chance. Too much integrity.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 874
    Last Post: 07-23-2017, 11:35 AM
  2. Replies: 39
    Last Post: 09-15-2016, 08:10 PM
  3. Replies: 38
    Last Post: 08-24-2016, 04:22 AM
  4. Spoof emails
    By AestheticDeath in forum Off-Topic
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-10-2008, 07:23 PM
  5. Suspicious emails
    By LaVaca in forum Off-Topic
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 10-03-2003, 10:32 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •