I for one would be interested in hearing from Riltus about this testing:
Ranger w/ handaxe: No weighting
Warrior w/handaxe: Weighting
In regard to the
height/size system. Was the warrior that did the testing the same height/size as the ranger. And what were the targets being tested. For instance, was the ranger a giantman swinging a handaxe at hobgoblinss, and the warrior a halfling swinging the handaxe at hobgoblins? You get the idea.
EDIT - interestingly I went back and read the thread and it seems that Riltus used a
halfling warrior and a DE rogue for testing. I don't know what race, i.e., the height/size, of the ranger who didnt realize phantom damage from his dex bonus (whereas the halfling warrior did), however, and would be interested to know!
EDIT2 - skimmed again, the ranger was a half elf. So Ritlus found no phatom damage from dex
by a half elf attacking a hobgoblin with a handaxe, but he did find phantom damage from dex
by a halfling attacking a hobgobilin with a handaxe. Ritlus speculated that the difference could be related to some sort of profession factor, and I have no idea on that, and I don't meant to discount that possibility by speculating other possible grounds for the difference he found there, i.e. the height/reach system which as discussed in another thread here on the PC has a surprising amount of granularity accounting not just for the height of the attacker/defender but also the size of the weapon used. A simple enough experiment would to repeat the test on waraxe,
this time using the same size warrior and ranger when attacking the hobgoblin.
Anyone more familiar with the height size system mind chiming in on the relative sizes of halflings, half elfs, and hobgoblins? Also, what is the "height" of a halfling with a waraxe (if you will, again I am referred to the incredibly granularized height system from another thread) vs. a hobgoblin? here is that other thread by the way:
http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthrea...e-Aiming/page5