Respond to Reputation Comments

[Whirlin]

Him harassing members is a bad thing but Tyrant signing neg rep as other members is just dandy. Okay.

That is not ok either.
But given that Haldrik made publicly available a script to check who provided the rep, the individuals' name signed became a non-issue, because it's so easy to trace exactly who left what.

[Gelston]

That is not ok either.
But given that Haldrik made publicly available a script to check who provided the rep, the individuals' name signed became a non-issue, because it's so easy to trace exactly who left what.

Which didn't exist when he did it. Tyrant earns the reps he gets either way.

PLUS, not everyone knows about that. what if some n00b joined and got neg rep from so and so and they signed it Whirlin? Yeah, even though rep isn't completely anonymous that shit still shouldn't be allowed if you're going to go all batshit rules crazy now.

[drauz]

[Whirlin]

Which didn't exist when he did it. Tyrant earns the reps he gets either way.

PLUS, not everyone knows about that. what if some n00b joined and got neg rep from so and so and they signed it Whirlin? Yeah, even though rep isn't completely anonymous that shit still shouldn't be allowed if you're going to go all batshit rules crazy now.

I checked rep that you/Tisket received this year, and I only saw once instance of rep that was erroneously signed, which was done by Methais against you. I can view it by received rep, not by outgoing. If there's another acct you'd like me to review, let me know.

Three sequential posts about how his existence is just to harass members is different than repping that occurred in 2015 before I was appointed moderator.

[Gelston]

I checked rep that you/Tisket received this year, and I only saw once instance of rep that was erroneously signed, which was done by Methais against you. I can view it by received rep, not by outgoing. If there's another acct you'd like me to review, let me know.

Three sequential posts about how his existence is just to harass members is different than repping that occurred in 2015 before I was appointed moderator.

It was left for Parkbandit by Tyrant signed as me. PERHAPS THAT IS A REASON FOR PB DOING WHAT HE DOES TO TYRANT! Not that I really care. I'd prefer that you just stuck to spam deletion, but it appears you won't. Before long I suppose we'll have to go back to calling things beef wellington.

[Wrathbringer]

If you are admitting that you're purpose is harassing members, then your time on these forums have come to a close.

[Whirlin]

It was left for Parkbandit by Tyrant signed as me. Not that I really care. I'd prefer that you just stuck to spam deletion, but it appears you won't. Before long I suppose we'll have to go back to calling things beef wellington.

I stick to Spam detection and user reports

PB received rep from Tyrant on May 19th, Feb 14th, July 30th 2016, Jan 13th 2016. None had your name in them or referenced you in any way.

[Gelston]

I stick to Spam detection and user reports

PB received rep from Tyrant on May 19th, Feb 14th, July 30th 2016, Jan 13th 2016. None had your name in them or referenced you in any way.

If PB was lying about it, and Tyrant not refuting it, then that is onew thing. I, for one, think you might have missed it. I imagine he'll be in here to post crotchety old man things soon enough.

[Whirlin]

If PB was lying about it, and Tyrant not refuting it, then that is onew thing. I, for one, think you might have missed it. I imagine he'll be in here to post crotchety old man things soon enough.

So... I went further. turns out, I didn't miss it, I just didn't go far enough back. Browsing through rep is 20/page, so I only went back to the beginning of last year. This occurrence that you're referencing was made on November 6th, 2013.

[Gelston]

So... I went further. turns out, I didn't miss it, I just didn't go far enough back. Browsing through rep is 20/page, so I only went back to the beginning of last year. This occurrence that you're referencing was made on November 6th, 2013.

Holy fuck. I thought it was a lot more recent than that.