The judge is trying to prevent a review of shit Trump took from them, all the while they're trying to make sure none of our highest classified documents made its way to foreign powers as a result of the theft. The red flag was Trump's theft. Confirmation of the problem was a Trump appointee trying to give implied ownership of federal records to Trump.
They generally "explore the thiefs(sic) rights" when they see the title. And regardless, this is would all be a matter, 100%, of public record. The Trump raid isn't. You see all the redacted stuff? A non-biased person looking it over is great for both sides.
Why are you always against the Judicial System?
Last edited by Gelston; 09-09-2022 at 09:40 AM.
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam
Has nothing to do with what is or isn't public record, classified national security documents are protected by attorney client privilege or the Trump teams pipe dream that Trump has executive privilege. They're documents produced by the executive branch, owned by the Federal government, and illegally in the possession of a citizen. Executive privilege doesn't apply, thus a special master to review classified materials needn't be appointed. The DOJ has attempted to meet in the middle, allowing a special master of non classified information such as Trump's memos from his advisors, which is an incredibly relevant carve out.