Originally Posted by
Shaps
Actually... it does...
"(B) Inventory. An officer present during the execution of the warrant must prepare and verify an inventory of any property seized. The officer must do so in the presence of another officer and the person from whom, or from whose premises, the property was taken. If either one is not present, the officer must prepare and verify the inventory in the presence of at least one other credible person."
In this case, "credible person" would be the lawyer.
So - as said, holding judgment - but current reporting is they threw Trumps legal representation out, put down generic information for the inventory, didn't annotate or designate where any of it was acquired on the property, then handed the sheet to his lawyers without properly verifying the items being taken.
Reporting could change, but how currently looking. One would think though... that if you're going to raid a former Presidents house... everything would be done by the numbers, all the t's crossed and i's dotted. That's just me though.