I just did a pure bard... I did more MnE ranks than bard ranks (keeping MnE at level).
I did it because the CS cost was very low (each MnE rank is worth like .83 CS vs 1 CS rank for a bard rank), but it provides more TD not to mention making ewave better. Both of those are defensive value - ward spells in the case of TD or putting critters in more RT with better ewave.
Either way, I think you need more spells for your build. You could do 88 MnE and 50 bard for example. That would be 1.5x spell training which I think you should be aiming for if you want to be a pure bard.
EDIT - I do not understand why 75 manipulation lore is often recommended for a pure bard. I know it makes 1030 "more powerful" - but its akin to adding damage weighting to a claid. With 1030 I am crit killing, not bleeding out critters, so added damage seems worthless. I could be missing something here, but most guides I have read have been at the level of "get 75 ranks for better 1030." I would look at stopping manipulation lore at 15 ranks and putting the many TPs you will save into something better like more spell ranks (for example). More CS, for example, especially up to 2x per level in spells, would increase the chance of that crit kill you are going for with 1030.
EDIT2 - this is from the gswiki on ewave. "The primary success factor of this spell is a level comparison of the caster versus its targets. Minor Elemental ranks are also factored in." And not that Ewave success is not just binary - you can put creatures in longer RT with greater success (with low success they could get knocked down but cast at you from the ground right away). The point about the casting failure with ewave an augmented chain cuts both ways (I would wear double leather to avoid spell failure with a critical spell, such as ewave)
Last edited by gilchristr; 03-01-2021 at 01:33 AM.
I accepted free spells during an "automated third party promotion" from "the responsible party," but I only did it once, and I didn't hunt until after they wore off