It’s because people are skeptical when asked directly about who they’re voting for, especially Trump voters.
https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign...ning-bigly?amp
It’s because people are skeptical when asked directly about who they’re voting for, especially Trump voters.
https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign...ning-bigly?amp
Skeptical or secretive?
This article was terribly reasoned. Trump still could very well win (~10% chance), but the arguments here are so beyond speculative, they're just laughable. "Research shows that the wording of questions can affect responses!" Yeah, someone call the entire polling industry and let them know about this hugely important new discovery. And they ignore important counter-evidence. "People don't like confrontation!" Correct, but there's no significant difference between Trump support in live caller polls vs online polls, which kind of kills that entire point.
It's just a silly article.
Yeah. It’s the sort of terribly reasoned piece that ends up becoming a GRE “Analyze This Argument” question for wannabe grad students to tear apart.
Last edited by BriarFox; 10-30-2020 at 09:46 PM.
My current items for sale or trade: Treasures in the Brambles.
Contact: Nuadjha (Discord and LNet), Briarfox@play.net