Ruth Bader Ginsburg died

[Tgo01]

Bible doesn't say that at all actually.

That's the New Testament. Old Testament is very clear on this:

Deuteronomy 19:15-21

“A single witness shall not suffice against a person for any crime or for any wrong in connection with any offense that he has committed. Only on the evidence of two witnesses or of three witnesses shall a charge be established. If a malicious witness arises to accuse a person of wrongdoing, hen both parties to the dispute shall appear before the Lord, before the priests and the judges who are in office in those days. The judges shall inquire diligently, and if the witness is a false witness and has accused his brother falsely, then you shall do to him as he had meant to do to his brother. So you shall purge the evil from your midst. And the rest shall hear and fear, and shall never again commit any such evil among you. Your eye shall not pity. It shall be life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot.

And just so we're clear here I am very much agnostic.

[Solkern]

It's not that you are not up to date with US laws.. it's that you really, really wanted to make an intelligent point.. and as usual, failed.

There are about a million abortions every year in the US and about 10-20 percent of ALL pregnancies end in miscarriage.

In before you claim you were just trolling again...

And you still didn’t answer one single question I asked. Did I ask how many abortions were in the US every year? Did I ask about miscarriages? Are you really that bad at reading comprehension?
My questions were towards if life starts at conception, if a zygote, is considered life, what rights do they have? Should they have rights? If they are considered a human life, could a parent claim them as a dependent? Etc etc.

You try to make an intelligent response, next time, try to respond to the actual questions asked. I know it might be difficult for you, but give it a try.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

Bible doesn't say that at all actually.

Didn't you just say "it doesn't say that at all actually", and then quote exactly an eye for an eye?

I know, not your point, but I found it worth a chuckle.

[Gelston]

That's the New Testament. Old Testament is very clear on this:

Deuteronomy 19:15-21



And just so we're clear here I am very much agnostic.

The New Testament sorta overwrites the old in conflicting points. Otherwise, no Christian should be eating pork.

[drauz]

That's the New Testament. Old Testament is very clear on this:

Deuteronomy 19:15-21



And just so we're clear here I am very much agnostic.

Old Testament is before Jesus. What I said is a quote directly attributed to Jesus, who you mentioned.

[drauz]

Didn't you just say "it doesn't say that at all actually", and then quote exactly an eye for an eye?

I know, not your point, but I found it worth a chuckle.

Turn the other cheek is the exact opposite of eye for an eye.......

[Methais]

I'd add to that; people who abuse animals for sport or pleasure. And no, I can't be much more specific than I hate people who abuse animals and wish them death. And it's my scale. Like, swatting a dog for misbehaving isn't abuse, beating them repeatedly is. I'd love to be Judge Dread for animal abusers.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

[Parkbandit]

Democrats are the only ones trying to play fair at this point

[Parkbandit]

I was almost expecting him to vote against no matter what.

Yup. He so desperately wants to be relevant and loved.

[Parkbandit]

All they had to do was not double down on stupid. What'd they do? They doubled down on stupid.