It's also interesting that blue states overwhelmingly hold the top positions in the nation for homelessness. 1 out of every 4 homeless people in the US live in CA. Mississippi has the lowest homeless rate.
It's also interesting that blue states overwhelmingly hold the top positions in the nation for homelessness. 1 out of every 4 homeless people in the US live in CA. Mississippi has the lowest homeless rate.
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. ~ Marcus Aurelius“It's a beautiful thing, the destruction of words.”
― George Orwell, 1984
“The urge to shout filthy words at the top of his voice was as strong as ever.”
― George Orwell, 1984
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. ~ Marcus Aurelius“It's a beautiful thing, the destruction of words.”
― George Orwell, 1984
“The urge to shout filthy words at the top of his voice was as strong as ever.”
― George Orwell, 1984
https://wallethub.com/edu/states-mos...vernment/2700/
CA is ranked 39th.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List..._States_by_GDP
California has by far the highest GDP, even with all the homelessness, means they are doing some things right.
Last edited by Solkern; 05-30-2020 at 03:23 PM.
Pretty sure federal dollars are also a resource.
But yes, I understand what you mean.
But of course they use a lot of resources. It’s the biggest state, highest population and don’t forget makes the most money... States do different things, and supply the country in different ways. I’m 100% they are supporting other states in other ways.
Last edited by Solkern; 05-30-2020 at 03:28 PM.
https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=32312
Looks like it’s not California that uses the most resources.
https://www.ocregister.com/2017/07/2...-surprise-you/
And looks like California produces quite a lot of resources! I’m shocked by how much tbh!
Those rankings are always so easy to manipulate to get the outcome you want.
Like why doesn't it take into account military bases? I'm pretty sure California has several large military bases, all filled with military personnel with families and who all contribute to the local economy with their federal income.
Why doesn't it take into account national parks? I'm pretty sure those bring in some money to the local economy from tourists visiting the state just to visit those parks.
Why does it go by federal funding as a share of state revenue? So even if two states received the exact same amount of 100 million dollars in federal funding the "blue" state would receive a lower federal dependence funding score because their federal budget is 10 billion dollars while a red state would receive a higher score because their state funding is 1 billion dollars.
A wild pile of bricks appears.
https://www.facebook.com/17222488347...7429981953473/
Last edited by Methais; 05-30-2020 at 03:46 PM.
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. ~ Marcus Aurelius“It's a beautiful thing, the destruction of words.”
― George Orwell, 1984
“The urge to shout filthy words at the top of his voice was as strong as ever.”
― George Orwell, 1984