Twitter Fact Checks Trump

[Seran]

Please highlight where I 'argued for more government control and regulation.' In fact, if you read the words you quoted, you would see that I did the exact opposite.

My post was actually pointing out the calls for oversight and regulation by the man in the Whitehouse and his FoxNews allies. Your post is a pretty bias neutral observation of the likely result of social media's community standards

[Seran]

I'm not for more regulation, I just want Twitter and the rest to be held to the same standards as any other company. You are the only person here (well and Solkern) who want Twitter to be special yet you can't explain why they should have special rights.

No, I'm arguing that your lumping Twitter into a category of content producers is a flawed argument. Blogging has been around for nigh thirty years and hosts all the way from pioneers like Myspace, to modern day Twitter and Instagram, set rules to what you can and cannot post and freely remove material that doesn't meet their community standards. Companies have never farmed their content screening out to unaffiliated third parties.

The argument that municipalities and government figures deciding to use a blogging website is grounds for regulation, it's not. That some authority figures chose to engage in cyber-bullying or disruptive political propaganda , yet demand special treatment and exemptions from community standards agreements they entered into is also wrong.

[Methais]

Um. Did you notice that the President of the United States cares?

He means no one cares about you. And he is correct.

[Astray]

He means no one cares about you. And he is correct.

This is correct.

[Methais]

LOL

Hi, PK.

Pk would never have the self control to pull off ClydeR all these years. He's too stupid.

ClydeR is stupid too, but a different stupid.

Which is their right. If the President wants to post his lies, insinuations, innuendoes and harassment, he's free to avail himself of any other service. Hell, I'm sure he could make his own blog on the Whitehouse.gov.

Because the President wants to make use of Twitter's platform and it's millions or users, he has to abide by their terms of service. Period.

You might be even more butthurt than cwolff at this point. And he took butthurt to a whole new level.

[Tgo01]

No, I'm arguing that your lumping Twitter into a category of content producers is a flawed argument. Blogging has been around for nigh thirty years and hosts all the way from pioneers like Myspace, to modern day Twitter and Instagram, set rules to what you can and cannot post and freely remove material that doesn't meet their community standards. Companies have never farmed their content screening out to unaffiliated third parties.

The argument that municipalities and government figures deciding to use a blogging website is grounds for regulation, it's not. That some authority figures chose to engage in cyber-bullying or disruptive political propaganda , yet demand special treatment and exemptions from community standards agreements they entered into is also wrong.

Just answer why you think Twitter should have special rights? This isn't a hard question for a normal person, but you're a retard so I understand the difficulty.

[Parkbandit]

Pk would never have the self control to pull off ClydeR all these years. He's too stupid.

ClydeR is stupid too, but a different stupid.

ClydeR is someone who is a delicate, sensitive little flower who is used to pretending to be something he is not on the Internet.

You might be even more butthurt than cwolff at this point. And he took butthurt to a whole new level.

I don't know.. if cwolff came back and Seran left.. would you even know the difference?

[Tisket]

I don't know.. if cwolff came back and Seran left.. would you even know the difference?

Who was cwolff?

[Seran]

Just answer why you think Twitter should have special rights? This isn't a hard question for a normal person, but you're a retard so I understand the difficulty.

I don't accept your premise that it even needs to be considered. Go ask Hannity for a better argument.

[HOUSE]

I can't believe you guys are arguing about a free internet platform where literally anyone can use it so long as they follow the terms of service which means they've given up essentially all rights in what the platform does once it's posted.

Those folks saying don't like it, don't use it are right.

Frankly I can't believe people use it, only ever irritated me so I dumped all that social media shit and am very much enjoying not seeing it.

DONALD TRUMP, PLEASE SEE ATTACHED.