No, I'm arguing that your lumping Twitter into a category of content producers is a flawed argument. Blogging has been around for nigh thirty years and hosts all the way from pioneers like Myspace, to modern day Twitter and Instagram, set rules to what you can and cannot post and freely remove material that doesn't meet their community standards. Companies have never farmed their content screening out to unaffiliated third parties.
The argument that municipalities and government figures deciding to use a blogging website is grounds for regulation, it's not. That some authority figures chose to engage in cyber-bullying or disruptive political propaganda , yet demand special treatment and exemptions from community standards agreements they entered into is also wrong.
ClydeR is someone who is a delicate, sensitive little flower who is used to pretending to be something he is not on the Internet.
I don't know.. if cwolff came back and Seran left.. would you even know the difference?You might be even more butthurt than cwolff at this point. And he took butthurt to a whole new level.
We must not confuse dissent with disloyalty. We must remember always that accusation is not proof and that conviction depends upon evidence and due process of law. We will not walk in fear, one of another. We will not be driven by fear into an age of unreason, if we dig deep in our history and our doctrine, and remember that we are not descended from fearful men. Edward R. Murrow