Page 4 of 10 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 94

Thread: Oliver Stone Convicted - Facing 20 Years in Prison

  1. Default

    You know both the defense and the prosecutors have input on the jury selection, right?

    Granted if this person lied in those interviews, thats something. If not...
    https://stopthemadness.gop/
    https://snowflakevictory.com/

    http://www.usdebtclock.org/

    Click the link above to see how much you owe the government.

    ďIf you donít believe in free speech for people who you disagree with, and even hate for what they stand for, then you donít believe in free speech.Ē
    -My favorite liberal

  2. #32

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Suppa Hobbit Mage View Post
    You know both the defense and the prosecutors have input on the jury selection, right?

    Granted if this person lied in those interviews, thats something. If not...
    She either flat out lied during the interviews or the judge ignored the defense's wishes in having her removed. No way the defense would have allowed this shit juror.

  3. #33

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tgo01 View Post
    So he doesn't deserve a fair trial?

    Oh yeah, the impartial forewoman also mocked Stone's arrest and implied only racists were upset with it.
    Let me guess. You read it on the Twitter, so it must be true?
    I don't use Lich. If you want to do business with me, contact me via PM, IG, or on AIM. Or maybe use smoke signals. Don't like it, get off of my lawn.

  4. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tgo01 View Post
    She either flat out lied during the interviews or the judge ignored the defense's wishes in having her removed. No way the defense would have allowed this shit juror.
    I'm not an expert, but I have watched some movies. You select the jury from a limited pool of people. Prosecutors pick 6, defense pick 6. So... there's gonna be bias on both sides, evenly.
    https://stopthemadness.gop/
    https://snowflakevictory.com/

    http://www.usdebtclock.org/

    Click the link above to see how much you owe the government.

    ďIf you donít believe in free speech for people who you disagree with, and even hate for what they stand for, then you donít believe in free speech.Ē
    -My favorite liberal

  5. #35

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Archigeek View Post
    Let me guess. You read it on the Twitter, so it must be true?
    I literally read her tweets themselves, yes. Of course to be fair that was "just" a retweet and not her actual words. That makes it so much better though I'm sure for an "impartial" forewoman.

    Quote Originally Posted by Suppa Hobbit Mage View Post
    I'm not an expert, but I have watched some movies. You select the jury from a limited pool of people. Prosecutors pick 6, defense pick 6. So... there's gonna be bias on both sides, evenly.
    I'm sure it works differently in every jurisdiction but of the two times I have been on a jury the judge, prosecution, and defense all had the power to dismiss a juror. One case I was on the judge dismissed a juror outright after just reading their answers. The prosecution and defense then asked several questions to see if they wanted to dismiss anyone but didn't. Of course these were all minor, low profile cases.

    The prosecution and defense didn't really "pick" anyone, rather there were about 30 potential jurors and only 6 were needed. 6 people were called up randomly (I was one of course, YAY!) and after the judge dismissed the one juror another juror was chosen at random to replace them. Then the questions came and if the defense or prosecution wanted anyone gone they could have asked the judge to dismiss them and another person at random would have been called up.

    Again like I said each jurisdiction is probably different, but I imagine they all work similar to this.
    Last edited by Tgo01; 02-13-2020 at 11:46 AM.

  6. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tgo01 View Post
    I'm sure it works differently in every jurisdiction but of the two times I have been on a jury the judge, prosecution, and defense all had the power to dismiss a juror. One case I was on the judge dismissed a juror outright after just reading their answers. The prosecution and defense then asked several questions to see if they wanted to dismiss anyone but didn't. Of course these were all minor, low profile cases.
    Again, from my extensive movie research, the pool isn't unlimited. Yes, they can throw out a limited number, but they still have to select from a limited pool.
    https://stopthemadness.gop/
    https://snowflakevictory.com/

    http://www.usdebtclock.org/

    Click the link above to see how much you owe the government.

    ďIf you donít believe in free speech for people who you disagree with, and even hate for what they stand for, then you donít believe in free speech.Ē
    -My favorite liberal

  7. #37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Suppa Hobbit Mage View Post
    Again, from my extensive movie research, the pool isn't unlimited. Yes, they can throw out a limited number, but they still have to select from a limited pool.
    I edited my post with more information but yes, the pool isn't unlimited but there is usually a lot to choose from. I'm sure they can call in more jurors if there are too many that have to be thrown out. Of course the judge can put an end to it if they think the defense or prosecution is dismissing too many jurors for no good reason, but if there are good reasons to keep dismissing jurors I imagine the judge should be okay with it. But again there are reasons to believe even the judge in this case was anything but impartial.
    Last edited by Tgo01; 02-13-2020 at 11:54 AM.

  8. #38

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Suppa Hobbit Mage View Post
    Stone is a douche and deserves what he gets. I grant you the raid on his house was retarded, but the dude did violate a gag order, did witness tamper.
    I agree.. if there is evidence that the lengthy recommendation is justified and not just another case of TDS.
    RETARD HALL OF FAME

    Quote Originally Posted by Back View Post
    There will be no war when guns are more regulated.
    Quote Originally Posted by Androidpk View Post
    horrific state of conditions = the biggest election win in 40 decades
    Quote Originally Posted by Tsa`ah View Post
    Well tell that to the Naval hospital that issued a birth certificate labeled Ft Lejeune ... and then typed it in.
    Quote Originally Posted by Back View Post
    3 million more popular votes. I'd say the numbers speak for themselves. Gerrymandering won for Trump.

  9. #39

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Suppa Hobbit Mage View Post
    Again, from my extensive movie research, the pool isn't unlimited. Yes, they can throw out a limited number, but they still have to select from a limited pool.
    Everything I know about trials, Buick Skylarks, and positraction, I learned from My Cousin Vinny.

    I consider myself a bit of an expert on these topics.
    Last edited by Methais; 02-13-2020 at 12:34 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Keller View Post
    Also, what do you monsters eat that you don't enjoy the aroma of your flatulence from time to time?
    Quote Originally Posted by Back
    I am a retard. I'm disabled. I'm poor. I'm black. I'm gay. I'm transgender. I'm a woman.
    Quote Originally Posted by Back View Post
    Remember, I'm a tiny dick pussy.



  10. #40
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Ohai, NZ
    Posts
    7,444
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Methais View Post
    Everything I know about trials, Buick Skylarks, and positraction, I learned from My Cousin Vinny.

    I consider myself a bit of an expert on these topics.
    and Utes.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •