Pelosi officially announces impeachment inquiry

[~Rocktar~]

It has always been my belief that most media 'polls' are simply tools to influence the common undecided voter who would prefer to vote for the 'winner'.

That could well be true.

[Tgo01]

Fox News pollster Braun Research misrepresented impeachment poll: analysis

A poll weighted for party affiliation would have concluded that 44.9% favored impeachment and 44.4% opposed it, a Post analysis has concluded.

This is what I said back when someone first linked that laughable poll.

[Parkbandit]

I’m going to say McConnell “not using a lame tactic “ is defined by how partisan a person is. Coming from a true non-partisan voter, it was extremely lame.

There's nothing "non-partisan" about you.

[Methais]

It has always been my belief that most media 'polls' are simply tools to influence the common undecided voter who would prefer to vote for the 'winner'.

This is correct.

[Tgo01]

Adam Schitt For Brains just banned Republicans from a closed hearing regarding this impeachment nonsense.

Even Democrats and those suffering from TDS can surely see now this is all bullshit yes?

[Seran]

Adam Schitt For Brains just banned Republicans from a closed hearing regarding this impeachment nonsense.

Even Democrats and those suffering from TDS can surely see now this is all bullshit yes?

They removed a Republican from the hearing due to their not actually being on one of the investigating committees. Other Republicans who were on those committees attended. Though I can understand why you're trying to spin this as some huge conspiracy, but as always you're mislead or deliberately trying to mislead others.

[Seran]

Not even FoxNews is spinning it as badly as you are. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/rep...nquiry-hearing

[Tgo01]

They removed a Republican from the hearing due to their not actually being on one of the investigating committees. Other Republicans who were on those committees attended. Though I can understand why you're trying to spin this as some huge conspiracy, but as always you're mislead or deliberately trying to mislead others.

Gonna go down fighting I see. This all seems perfectly normal to you to hold closed hearings on an impeachment process and there are talks of keeping the "whistleblower" anonymous too.

What does Schitt have to hide exactly? Why are you okay with Congress holding private meetings to remove a duly elected president of the US? Why are you okay with this? Just answer this one question. Ignore all other comments in this post and don't deflect, just answer this one simple question. Thanks.

[Seran]

Gonna go down fighting I see. This all seems perfectly normal to you to hold closed hearings on an impeachment process and there are talks of keeping the "whistleblower" anonymous too.

What does Schitt have to hide exactly? Why are you okay with Congress holding private meetings to remove a duly elected president of the US? Why are you okay with this? Just answer this one question. Ignore all other comments in this post and don't deflect, just answer this one simple question. Thanks.

I absolutely would love all hearings to be not only public, but broadcast on a special channel available to /everyone/, but the laws regarding confidentiality and secrecy mean that can't happen. I'm sure you understand why. If you don't, I'm sorry that your political agenda interferes with logic.

[Tgo01]

but the laws regarding confidentiality and secrecy mean that can't happen.

Which laws state impeachment inquiry meetings have to be confidential and secret? I'm dying to learn more.