Just came across this headline: https://www.apnews.com/7e9e77a5701d40fc9e83c39d83e0bd4c
The story is sort of ambiguous. No explanation on why surgery was not performed, which is normal if it can be apparently in pancreatic cancer, and they say, “treated definitively and there is no evidence of disease elsewhere in the body", I was in the health care field for a time and I have never heard the word definitively used.
So I was curious about that definition so I dug into it, here is the definition of definitive treatment from the National Cancer Institute, 'The treatment plan for a disease or disorder that has been chosen as the best one for a patient after all other choices have been considered.'
I find the wording of the press release interesting because they say no where else in the body but do not say if they eliminated it from the pancreas.