Wyrom confirmed, GM's are listening and monitoring lnet

[Taernath]

This is basically akin to if they started using things said on these forums to go after players in the game. It is a third party thing. You can, and I have seen people, spoof their names on LNet.

I think Wyrom needs to back up on this shit.

Andraste did. Remember that shit?

[Stumplicker]

I'm just gonna put this here. I'll say once that it gets juuuust....instant results, and makes Mario look like a fucking idiot. But here's a fun email address to direct any complaints of malfeasance to rather than waiting 6 weeks for an assist/refer/go fuck yourself cycle:

Jörgen Larsson, CEO
Phone +46 70 321 18 00 or e-mail jorgen@stillfront.com

https://www.stillfront.com/contact/

[Wyrom]

Guess I'll come out of retirement a moment.

Just so it's clear. We don't police lnet. We were sent logs from several sources about the use of some strong language. Due to POLICY 3 updates and feedback being emailed (chain-of-command over me), the following discussion took place. No GM is monitoring lnet and going through what you say. But players can certainly say something to us. This is the social climate we live in today.

[Luntz]

Safe space incoming

[Stumplicker]

Guess I'll come out of retirement a moment.

Just so it's clear. We don't police lnet. We were sent logs from several sources about the use of some strong language. Due to POLICY 3 updates and feedback being emailed (chain-of-command over me), the following discussion took place. No GM is monitoring lnet and going through what you say. But players can certainly say something to us. This is the social climate we live in today.

We know exactly what you're trying to do, and that you have zero authority to do so. You brought him in to see if he'd hang himself. You are in fact attempting to police properties outside of your official channels, and that is legally defensible in any court of law unless you have the permission and logs directly from the owners of the third party systems involved. I assume then that these logs you have received came from Tillmen?

[beldannon5]

Yep lots of whiny bitches that cant untune lnet sigh

[Taernath]

Guess I'll come out of retirement a moment.

Just so it's clear. We don't police lnet. We were sent logs from several sources about the use of some strong language. Due to POLICY 3 updates and feedback being emailed (chain-of-command over me), the following discussion took place. No GM is monitoring lnet and going through what you say. But players can certainly say something to us. This is the social climate we live in today.

What's your process for determining if what is said in a log is truthful?

[Gelston]

I could have sworn, many times in the past, that GMs have said they don't accept player logs as any sort of evidence because... You know, they can be altered. Is this policy changing now?

[Neveragain]

Hey, tell you what, Wyrom. If you want to moderate the chat channels everyone uses, why not make your own? Zaoloo may be the (roughly) human equivalent of a bucket of jizz with chips of shit in it, but LNet isn't yours to police.

~Taverkin

Ditto.

When will Wyrom grow a set and start temp banning the people that constantly harass other players over rightthink?

[Donquix]

Guess I'll come out of retirement a moment.

Just so it's clear. We don't police lnet. We were sent logs from several sources about the use of some strong language. Due to POLICY 3 updates and feedback being emailed (chain-of-command over me), the following discussion took place. No GM is monitoring lnet and going through what you say. But players can certainly say something to us. This is the social climate we live in today.

Whats the chain of command so I can email all the times you told me to fuck off on lnet? I have totally real and verifiable logs.

You have no purview into a god damn thing on lnet. Stay in your fucking lane. Reply to people "this isn't something we have control of or any way to verify." end of fucking email, sack up and do your job.