lol[LNet]-GSIV:Lnetpolice: "Please do not take my name in vain" (22:18:25)
I'd be curious to check, but a couple years back I heard it was easy to Wireshark anyone's Simu account in a cafe, since it was all plaintext.
Maybe the upgraded security which tracks gasp case entry has already resolved this?
Does anyone know if we can still grab passwords on public wifi? I never tried, but I heard that used to be a cinch (but was irrelevant, since the player base is statistically too small for likely intercept).
Depends how accessible the data/proof is.
IF you commit an illegal act on lnet it will go something like this: (Let's pretend something terrible)…
The police will receive the complaint. The Sergent-Detective will contact the company running the game asking the data. You think the company (stillfront/simu) will say they do not control that third party? I totally think Simu will force Tillmen to give them the data.. but let's pretend he won't.
Who do you think they'll ask after? Your provider. Same stuff happened when people were bittorrenting stuff, company sent complaints to the internet providers and they were legally obliged to sent them the use of their users.
It has nothing to do with how I personally feel about Wyrom or Zaoloo. It's the overreach. Simutronics has no business applying policy to things said outside of their product. Further, the solution is simple and obvious: Advise the offended parties to simply use the ignore feature or not use the software. We should not even be having this discussion. The fact is Wyrom over-stepped. Plain and simple. If I were him, I'd acknowledge the fact and move on. Then we can all go back to enjoying Gemstone, hating Zaoloo, and choosing whether or not we want to take the good with the bad when it comes to LNet.
~Taverkin
That's what you feel happened? You think Simutronics had their lawyer send a certified letter to Tillmen requesting server logs, then Tillmen gave those logs to the company, which, sure, maybe he would, then Simutronics verified that the data was legitimate and decided to police Zaoloo?
No. If Wyrom had been acting on anyone's authority but his own, he would have never come here to try to shift blame when it started blowing up in his face. He claims that word came down from above him to do this. Not a chance. If he was backed by anyone he would never have showed up here. I suspect that Zaoloo was a player who he felt he wanted to ban but had no policy reason to do so, so he set out to make a paper trail towards getting rid of him.
He overstepped, went out on a limb without permission, and got caught, and now he wants it to quietly go away. No such luck.
Last edited by Stumplicker; 12-17-2018 at 05:48 PM.
I still wanna know who got trolled so hard on lnet they reported it.
You had better pay your guild dues before you forget. You are 113 months behind.