The Stupidity from Ocasio-Cortez

[Parkbandit]

Why would you want Back dead? PB would have nothing to keep himself entertained with once he's done installing bathtubs.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

I mean, I think he just needs a good ass beating but okay.

I laughed

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

Not that she's on here anymore, but time4fun literally said that Backlash isn't stupid.

Which proves that there are people out there just as dumb as Backlash.

I don’t believe anyone could or would say that. Unless you offer conclusive proof t4f isn’t his alt, it didn’t happen.

[Astray]

I laughed

Just try not to punch him in the head, you'll break every bone in your arm.

[Back]

Here's the left openly embracing terrorism again. I wonder what Backlash thinks about this.

What do you think about this Back?

Hey since you asked so nicely...

I already posted about this but I know you don't read every single one of my posts every day.

I've read that someone thinks he had a suicide wish. While I do not think he deserved to die I would not advise tossing firebombs at anyone or anything period and if you do it to a government facility its reasonable to expect to catch a bullet or two fatally.

[Back]

He's not speaking for himself.

He's literally telling you the New Green Deal had nothing to do with climate change.. but he needed a vehicle that the uber stupid people of this country would climb aboard and help him drive to the desired goal.

You're the perfect person to continue to drive it... and not realize what a dumb sheep you are.

I can see how you might think that.

But its not really anything new to say the Green New Deal tackles more than just environmentally sustainable changes to our entire infrastructure. Creating jobs and spreading the prosperity around more equitably is part of it. Its all right there in the text of the document that has been out for a while now. Other people have mentioned equitable prosperity as being part of it before the date of the article you posted.

While Chakrabarti said "originally", and that refers to his and AOC's agenda, it is now still all one big package that does include sustainability. The issue of sustainability does not go away because people think we should also tackle prosperity. We can do more than one thing at once. None of this diminishes the need for sustainability.

So I'm not bothered by it at all but I can see how you might be.

[Methais]

I don’t believe anyone could or would say that. Unless you offer conclusive proof t4f isn’t his alt, it didn’t happen.

Her exact words were "No, actually, Back is not an idiot."

I had it in my sig for a while until more important things required sig space, like Italian Spiderman.

[Methais]

Hey since you asked so nicely...

I already posted about this but I know you don't read every single one of my posts every day.

I've read that someone thinks he had a suicide wish. While I do not think he deserved to die I would not advise tossing firebombs at anyone or anything period and if you do it to a government facility its reasonable to expect to catch a bullet or two fatally.

That doesn't answer anything.

The attack itself....do you condemn? Or is he a martyr?

[Methais]

I can see how you might think that.

But its not really anything new to say the Green New Deal tackles more than just environmentally sustainable changes to our entire infrastructure. Creating jobs and spreading the prosperity around more equitably is part of it. Its all right there in the text of the document that has been out for a while now. Other people have mentioned equitable prosperity as being part of it before the date of the article you posted.

While Chakrabarti said "originally", and that refers to his and AOC's agenda, it is now still all one big package that does include sustainability. The issue of sustainability does not go away because people think we should also tackle prosperity. We can do more than one thing at once. None of this diminishes the need for sustainability.

So I'm not bothered by it at all but I can see how you might be.

[Parkbandit]

I can see how you might think that.

But its not really anything new to say the Green New Deal tackles more than just environmentally sustainable changes to our entire infrastructure. Creating jobs and spreading the prosperity around more equitably is part of it. Its all right there in the text of the document that has been out for a while now. Other people have mentioned equitable prosperity as being part of it before the date of the article you posted.

His point was that they needed a tool to get people who are willfully ignorant to follow them and get them excited about spending 93 trillion dollars in 10 years. They found the tool necessary (climate change) and just pretended it was about the environment.

If you still don't get it... I can try and draw you a picture with crayons.

While Chakrabarti said "originally", and that refers to his and AOC's agenda, it is now still all one big package that does include sustainability. The issue of sustainability does not go away because people think we should also tackle prosperity. We can do more than one thing at once. None of this diminishes the need for sustainability.

Given your last excursion into the sustainability discussion... I'm surprised you would bring that up. Did you want to revisit that discussion?

Also, still waiting on a couple questions to be answered... though I know why you can't/won't...:

Can you tell us, specifically, how income inequality changes the global climate?

Also, can you tell us, specifically, how capitalism is bad for the environment, but socialism is the key to changing the global climate?

So I'm not bothered by it at all but I can see how you might be.