http://www.usdebtclock.org/
Click the link above to see how much you owe the government.
"Well I tell you what, if you have a problem figuring out whether you're for me or Trump, then you ain't black."
-Superracist, Joe Biden
“If you don’t believe in free speech for people who you disagree with, and even hate for what they stand for, then you don’t believe in free speech.”
-My favorite liberal
http://www.usdebtclock.org/
Click the link above to see how much you owe the government.
"Well I tell you what, if you have a problem figuring out whether you're for me or Trump, then you ain't black."
-Superracist, Joe Biden
“If you don’t believe in free speech for people who you disagree with, and even hate for what they stand for, then you don’t believe in free speech.”
-My favorite liberal
Hey since you asked so nicely...
I already posted about this but I know you don't read every single one of my posts every day.
I've read that someone thinks he had a suicide wish. While I do not think he deserved to die I would not advise tossing firebombs at anyone or anything period and if you do it to a government facility its reasonable to expect to catch a bullet or two fatally.
I can see how you might think that.
But its not really anything new to say the Green New Deal tackles more than just environmentally sustainable changes to our entire infrastructure. Creating jobs and spreading the prosperity around more equitably is part of it. Its all right there in the text of the document that has been out for a while now. Other people have mentioned equitable prosperity as being part of it before the date of the article you posted.
While Chakrabarti said "originally", and that refers to his and AOC's agenda, it is now still all one big package that does include sustainability. The issue of sustainability does not go away because people think we should also tackle prosperity. We can do more than one thing at once. None of this diminishes the need for sustainability.
So I'm not bothered by it at all but I can see how you might be.
Last edited by Methais; 07-17-2019 at 09:33 AM.
His point was that they needed a tool to get people who are willfully ignorant to follow them and get them excited about spending 93 trillion dollars in 10 years. They found the tool necessary (climate change) and just pretended it was about the environment.But its not really anything new to say the Green New Deal tackles more than just environmentally sustainable changes to our entire infrastructure. Creating jobs and spreading the prosperity around more equitably is part of it. Its all right there in the text of the document that has been out for a while now. Other people have mentioned equitable prosperity as being part of it before the date of the article you posted.
If you still don't get it... I can try and draw you a picture with crayons.
Given your last excursion into the sustainability discussion... I'm surprised you would bring that up. Did you want to revisit that discussion?While Chakrabarti said "originally", and that refers to his and AOC's agenda, it is now still all one big package that does include sustainability. The issue of sustainability does not go away because people think we should also tackle prosperity. We can do more than one thing at once. None of this diminishes the need for sustainability.
Also, still waiting on a couple questions to be answered... though I know why you can't/won't...:
So I'm not bothered by it at all but I can see how you might be.