Trump's Taxes

[Wrathbringer]

No innocent until proven guilty here. He's not on trial. He is being judged but not in criminal or even civil court.

Investigations provide evidence. Its not Ford's responsibility to investigate her alleged rapist just like it's no citizens responsibility to do that.

The Kavanaugh crowd wants to have it both ways. Either Ford's statements and eye witness account is evidence or it isn't. She's done her part and isn't responsible to investigate deeper. Don't get so twisted about this that you lose perspective.

butter.jpg

[BriarFox]

Democrats: "We will oppose anyone who Trump nominates by any means necessary, we don't care who it is or what we have to do!"

Also democrats: "This investigation wasn't good enough, we need more investigating before we cast our "no" votes that we already decided on before this guy was nominated!"

You: "I see nothing wrong with this behavior."

I don't. Trump is a disaster shoving through a chaotic right-wing agenda and a partisan nominee. Expecting him to do that and planning to oppose it isn't wrong. Acting against it when he does do that isn't wrong. Finding huge problems with that nominee during the confirmation process and strengthening the opposition isn't wrong. Complaining that the White House cherry-picked witnesses and created a sham investigation isn't wrong.

What IS wrong is what the Republicans did under McConnell to Merrick Garland, who was a centrist pick designed to appease them with no hint of a taint, but who was opposed purely because Republicans wanted a partisan judge.

[Parkbandit]

One of these days I hope you come home from work or wherever, and you walk in on PK fucking your wife. Don’t put it past him.

Oh, I wouldn't put it past him. I trust my wife not to sleep with sociopathic hobos though.

I hope one of these days, you come home from wherever you have been hanging out all day, and you walk in on PK fucking your husband.

[Parkbandit]

Who's to say I haven't already.

Oh, I'm sure you've tried to dox me.. because that's what creepy little sociopaths do who spend 80% of their time inside the house they are currently staying at.

My wife wouldn't give you the time of day kid. Sorry

[Parkbandit]

Nah man, the woman who decided PB was her best option has no standards.

Your meltdown has been spectacular.

Thank you for entertaining us.

[Wrathbringer]

Oh, I wouldn't put it past him. I trust my wife not to sleep with sociopathic hobos though.

I hope one of these days, you come home from wherever you have been hanging out all day, and you walk in on PK fucking your husband.

lol

[Parkbandit]

I don't. Trump is a disaster shoving through a chaotic right-wing agenda and a partisan nominee. Expecting him to do that and planning to oppose it isn't wrong. Acting against it when he does do that isn't wrong. Finding huge problems with that nominee during the confirmation process and strengthening the opposition isn't wrong. Complaining that the White House cherry-picked witnesses and created a sham investigation isn't wrong.

What IS wrong is what the Republicans did under McConnell to Merrick Garland, who was a centrist pick designed to appease them with no hint of a taint, but who was opposed purely because Republicans wanted a partisan judge.

If it IS wrong.. you need to talk to Joe Biden since the rule was named after him.

See what happens when your side does stupid things to change the way the Senate works so they can take advantage of it? It comes back to bite you in the ass.

First Biden. Then Reid.

You reap what you sow.

Enjoy it.. your side caused your own troubles.

[Methais]

I don't. Trump is a disaster

Nah.

shoving through a chaotic right-wing agenda

Nah.

and a partisan nominee.

Based on his judicial history, nah.

Expecting him to do that and planning to oppose it isn't wrong. Acting against it when he does do that isn't wrong. Finding huge problems with that nominee during the confirmation process and strengthening the opposition isn't wrong. Complaining that the White House cherry-picked witnesses and created a sham investigation isn't wrong.

So what you're saying is being mad about losing an election and throwing tantrums isn't wrong. Which technically it isn't, until you start doing all this retarded crazy shit the democrats have been doing for the past two years. Fortunately it's only been working against them unless you live in make believe soyland like cwolff.

What IS wrong is what the Republicans did under McConnell to Merrick Garland, who was a centrist pick designed to appease them with no hint of a taint, but who was opposed purely because Republicans wanted a partisan judge.

Could you explain why what they did with Garland is called the Biden rule? I can't seem to remember. But you seem like you would know. Thank you in advance.

[Fortybox]

I don't. Trump is a disaster shoving through a chaotic right-wing agenda and a partisan nominee. Expecting him to do that and planning to oppose it isn't wrong. Acting against it when he does do that isn't wrong. Finding huge problems with that nominee during the confirmation process and strengthening the opposition isn't wrong. Complaining that the White House cherry-picked witnesses and created a sham investigation isn't wrong.

What IS wrong is what the Republicans did under McConnell to Merrick Garland, who was a centrist pick designed to appease them with no hint of a taint, but who was opposed purely because Republicans wanted a partisan judge.

Your sides rules allowed for that to happen.

You lost, get over it soyfox.

[Parkbandit]

Either Ford's statements and eye witness account is evidence or it isn't. She's done her part and isn't responsible to investigate deeper. Don't get so twisted about this that you lose perspective.

Her statements aren't evidence.. since all of her eye witnesses aren't eye witnesses at all.

The investigation is over.

Judge Kavanaugh will be confirmed.

Your delay tactics are now over.

Sorry (not sorry)