View Poll Results: Will Mueller charge Trump with obstructing justice?

Voters
18. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    7 38.89%
  • No

    4 22.22%
  • Yes, with tacos

    7 38.89%
Page 3 of 21 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 201

Thread: Did Trump obstruct justice?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Bendova
    Posts
    17,326
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    What unimaginative poll options.
    Quote Originally Posted by Gelston View Post
    I like penis.
    We must not confuse dissent with disloyalty. We must remember always that accusation is not proof and that conviction depends upon evidence and due process of law. We will not walk in fear, one of another. We will not be driven by fear into an age of unreason, if we dig deep in our history and our doctrine, and remember that we are not descended from fearful men. Edward R. Murrow

  2. #22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tisket View Post
    What unimaginative poll options.
    Consider the source.
    Discord: 3PiecesOfToast
    [Private]-GSIV:Nyatherra: "Until this moment i forgot that i changed your name to Biff Muffbanger on Lnet"
    Quote Originally Posted by Back View Post
    I am a retard. I'm disabled. I'm poor. I'm black. I'm gay. I'm transgender. I'm a woman. I'm diagnosed with cancer. I'm a human being.
    Quote Originally Posted by time4fun View Post
    So here's the deal- I am just horrible



  3. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tisket View Post
    What unimaginative poll options.
    Probably, but at the end of the day it's a simple yes or no outcome. Either Mueller will or he won't and I suspect we'll be finding out the answer to that sometime in the next 4 weeks.

  4. #24

    Default

    I am curious what people think he did to obstruct justice, fire Comey? Comey works for him and serves at his pleasure, think about the can of worms that would open if a chief executive cannot fire someone that serves at the pleasure. People would be stuck with whoever got appointed previously, irregardless of who appointed them. On the flip side for you more liberal of mindset, think if Trump appoints Trey Gowdy AG and the next democrat elected could not replace him.

  5. #25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kutter View Post
    I am curious what people think he did to obstruct justice, fire Comey? Comey works for him and serves at his pleasure, think about the can of worms that would open if a chief executive cannot fire someone that serves at the pleasure. People would be stuck with whoever got appointed previously, irregardless of who appointed them. On the flip side for you more liberal of mindset, think if Trump appoints Trey Gowdy AG and the next democrat elected could not replace him.
    Don't be absurd. It's only illegal if Republicans do it.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Arizona Bay
    Posts
    9,440

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kutter View Post
    I am curious what people think he did to obstruct justice, fire Comey? Comey works for him and serves at his pleasure, think about the can of worms that would open if a chief executive cannot fire someone that serves at the pleasure. People would be stuck with whoever got appointed previously, irregardless of who appointed them. On the flip side for you more liberal of mindset, think if Trump appoints Trey Gowdy AG and the next democrat elected could not replace him.
    You can't go on TV and say you fired the guy because of "This Rusher thing, this Trump-Russia thing". That's 1 example.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Kekistan
    Posts
    10,050
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kutter View Post
    I am curious what people think he did to obstruct justice, fire Comey? Comey works for him and serves at his pleasure, think about the can of worms that would open if a chief executive cannot fire someone that serves at the pleasure. People would be stuck with whoever got appointed previously, irregardless of who appointed them. On the flip side for you more liberal of mindset, think if Trump appoints Trey Gowdy AG and the next democrat elected could not replace him.
    Don't even try to explain, dude thinks Russians are arming Americans now.


    The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. ~ Marcus Aurelius
    “It's a beautiful thing, the destruction of words.”
    ― George Orwell, 1984

    “The urge to shout filthy words at the top of his voice was as strong as ever.”
    ― George Orwell, 1984

  8. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kutter View Post
    I am curious what people think he did to obstruct justice, fire Comey? Comey works for him and serves at his pleasure, think about the can of worms that would open if a chief executive cannot fire someone that serves at the pleasure. People would be stuck with whoever got appointed previously, irregardless of who appointed them. On the flip side for you more liberal of mindset, think if Trump appoints Trey Gowdy AG and the next democrat elected could not replace him.
    That's one of the reasons. Yes, the FBI director serves at the pleasure of the POTUS and can be fired at any time. Why did he fire Comey though? Because he asked the then FBI director to drop things with Flynn, even though he knew Flynn was under a criminal investigation. That is obstruction. Asking Sessions not to recuse himself was obstruction. Trying to fire Mueller was obstruction. Telling Sessions to end special counsel investigation was obstruction.

    I've long said that firing Comey was about the worst things Trump could have done and that his tweets were going to do him in.

  9. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Neveragain View Post
    Don't even try to explain, dude thinks Russians are arming Americans now.
    I never said that.

  10. #30

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Androidpk View Post
    That's one of the reasons. Yes, the FBI director serves at the pleasure of the POTUS and can be fired at any time. Why did he fire Comey though? Because he asked the then FBI director to drop things with Flynn, even though he knew Flynn was under a criminal investigation. That is obstruction. Asking Sessions not to recuse himself was obstruction. Trying to fire Mueller was obstruction. Telling Sessions to end special counsel investigation was obstruction.

    I've long said that firing Comey was about the worst things Trump could have done and that his tweets were going to do him in.
    How is it obstruction of justice, when every single person you just cited works for him and he can fire them without cause, whenever he wants? And Sessions should never have recused himself and Rosenstein should recuse himself. The DOJ has some very serious issues that need to be addressed or what little faith in the system that remains will be lost, forever.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 01-23-2019, 05:17 PM
  2. Replies: 65
    Last Post: 07-22-2017, 03:01 PM
  3. Replies: 85
    Last Post: 06-28-2017, 09:52 AM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-02-2017, 08:45 PM
  5. Justice
    By Nieninque in forum Off-Topic
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 03-22-2005, 03:24 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •