Page 204 of 288 FirstFirst ... 104154194202203204205206214254 ... LastLast
Results 2,031 to 2,040 of 2873

Thread: Brett Kavanaugh

  1. #2031
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    With your mom
    Posts
    4,446

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Androidpk View Post
    Charles "Chad" Ludington, a North Carolina State University associate professor, [BA, Yale '87; MA, Columbia '95; M.Phil, Columbia '97; Ph.D, Columbia '03], who used to interact with Kavanaugh while the two were at Yale, told the Washington Post and New York Times Sunday the judge had been untruthful when he told the panel last week he had never "blacked out" because he frequently saw Kavanaugh “staggering from alcohol consumption.” .... "I witnessed him respond to a semi-hostile remark, not by defusing the situation, but by throwing his beer in the man’s face and starting a fight that ended with one of our mutual friends in jail."
    OMG - this is it. You found the silver bullet PK!



    Omgomgomggogkjenhkwsdnqaw lkrthis is it!1111infinity

  2. #2032

    Default

    Washington (CNN)In a memorandum to Republican senators, Rachel Mitchell says a "reasonable prosecutor" would not bring a case against Brett Kavanaugh based on Christine Blasey Ford's sexual assault allegation given the evidence presented to the Judiciary Committee.
    Mitchell, the sex crimes prosecutor hired by Senate Judiciary Committee Republicans who questioned Ford last Thursday, cites inconsistencies in Ford's statements to the committee, The Washington Post, and her therapist about the alleged assault, which Ford alleges took place when she and Kavanaugh were in high school.
    Mitchell also notes the lack of corroboration of Ford's account, including recalling details that could back her story.

    "In the legal context, here is my bottom line: A 'he said, she said' case is incredibly difficult to prove. But this case is even weaker than that," she wrote. "Dr. Ford identified other witnesses to the event, and those witnesses either refuted her allegations or failed to corroborate them. For the reasons discussed below, I do not think that a reasonable prosecutor would bring this case based on the evidence before the Committee. Nor do I believe that this evidence is sufficient to satisfy the preponderance-of-the-evidence standard."

    Here's what Mitchell's saying. It'll make all the rounds on Fox and places like PC. I get what she's saying and she's right. At this point it's a weak criminal or civil litigation case.

  3. #2033

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cwolff View Post
    Here's what Mitchell's saying. It'll make all the rounds on Fox and places like PC. I get what she's saying and she's right. At this point it's a weak criminal or civil litigation case.
    It's a weak case all around. There is more evidence of you being a soy drinking racist asshole than there is that Kavanaugh is a rapist.
    Last edited by Tgo01; 10-01-2018 at 12:30 AM.

  4. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tgo01 View Post
    It's a weak case all around.
    From a criminal law standpoint, there is no case against Kavanaugh. The burden of proof is on the state, not the defendant.

  5. #2035
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    With your mom
    Posts
    4,446

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cwolff View Post
    Here's what Mitchell's saying. It'll make all the rounds on Fox and places like PC. I get what she's saying and she's right. At this point it's a weak criminal or civil litigation case.

  6. #2036
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    The Danger Zone
    Posts
    11,546
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    People have been saying it's a weak case for a while. I guess now that CNN is saying it he'll believe it.
    You had better pay your guild dues before you forget. You are 113 months behind.

  7. #2037

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Taernath View Post
    People have been saying it's a weak case for a while. I guess now that CNN is saying it he'll believe it.
    Whos he?

  8. #2038
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    A Corporate Republic
    Posts
    12,126

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cwolff View Post
    Whos he?
    You, you stupid butthurt retard. Damn, you're dumb.

  9. #2039
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    A Corporate Republic
    Posts
    12,126

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Androidpk View Post
    Charles "Chad" Ludington, a North Carolina State University associate professor, [BA, Yale '87; MA, Columbia '95; M.Phil, Columbia '97; Ph.D, Columbia '03], who used to interact with Kavanaugh while the two were at Yale, told the Washington Post and New York Times Sunday the judge had been untruthful when he told the panel last week he had never "blacked out" because he frequently saw Kavanaugh “staggering from alcohol consumption.” .... "I witnessed him respond to a semi-hostile remark, not by defusing the situation, but by throwing his beer in the man’s face and starting a fight that ended with one of our mutual friends in jail."
    god you're retarded. THIS IS REALLY IT THIS TIME GUYS!!!!!!!!!11 subpoena subpoena

  10. #2040
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    28,156
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    You also shouldn't trust motherfuckers named Chad.
    Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •