Repeat after me, federal background investigations don't include 30+ year old accusations that just came to light a couple of weeks ago, especially when we're talking about minors.Originally Posted by Androidpk
Do you have any idea how absurd this sounds?
"I heard that Kavanaugh once felt up a girl when he was in the third grade. You should totally investigate this, FBI!"
Senior Member
Saw some of Kavanaughs interview. He said about 10 times that he wants a fair process and a chance to speak. Obviously he's not being denied that but since he's asking for it give him a fair process. Investigate all claims, report on findings then let the parties involved speak. Sounds good to me.
Senior Member
Yeah...if you want a fair process you agree to an FBI investigation.
You don't go to a Republican media outlet to do a TV interview and then go along with Congressional Republicans who refuse to allow any any other witnesses (which is normally what you would do in these instances).
He doesn't want a fair process. He wants a process that gets him nominated, no matter what the cost to his reputation or our faith in the Judiciary. He has already grossly politicized himself in this whole process- which means he should absolutely NOT be allowed on the Supreme Court.
Go grab another crazy right-wing Judge to nominate, if you must. But don't let this man and this process further damage this institution. He's lied under oath, he's been accused of sexual assault by 4 different women, and he's doing TV interviews on right-wing media stations.
This is just disgusting- even for McConnell's Senate.
Senior Member
Because that's what you do in a fucking background investigation you pinhead.
Senior Member
Prove it, cupcake.
With no proof.
No rule against that.
No you don't. You investigate recent alleged crimes, you investigate crimes that were reported at the time, you investigate criminal proceedings.
You don't go back 3+ decades to investigate an accusation that came out two weeks ago with no witnesses and which happened while the person was still in fucking high school. This is not how background checks work. It's what the Democrats have lied to you about and told you to parrot back.
The FBI investigating Anita Hill made sense because even though the accusations were old and were never reported the accusations were against a federal employee that supposedly happened on federal property, not a private citizen on private property. Learn to think for yourself because this is beyond embarrassing.
Black Mamba
TIL Tgo has ZERO clue of what a federal background investigation consists of. Not that I'm surprised.
Let's see your proof that a federal background investigation consists of the FBI investigating 30+ year old accusations that were just made a couple of weeks ago regarding something that happened in high school that happened occurred between private citizens on private land. Let's see if you can do something besides flap them gums of yours.
Black Mamba
What happened to your claim of researching/investigating on your own? Want me to hold your hand and walk you through the process? That's cute.
I've already researched/investigated this on my own and I can find nothing that suggests the FBI investigates the type of shit I just mentioned. You now want me to prove there isn't a teacup floating around in space. Nice.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
