Originally Posted by
time4fun
So if I had started with "He's clearly a predator because" AND also only listed that single point- you would be right.
But since my conclusion was: There are a few things that lend credibility to her accusations and a few things that question the credibility of his response.
And since I provided 4 points of evidence to support that conclusion...
It would be more accurate to say that your take on my argument is getting dangerously close to a Monty Python skit.
The rest of your post was along the lines of 'he may have lied before so it's more likely he's lying now' and 'the woman has no benefit to lie so she is clearly telling the truth'. Both points are weak enough that I didn't really feel the need to directly respond to them. The 'he has everything to gain by lying about not being a sexual predator' bit was the only thing that stopped me because of how outlandish it is.
Also, I don't think you actually know what Monty Python is, which in itself is a very strong indictment of your character.
Last edited by Taernath; 09-17-2018 at 04:22 PM.
You had better pay your guild dues before you forget. You are 113 months behind.