Originally Posted by
kutter
So here is what I would like to know about all the people that want to vilify a distinguished member of the bench with absolutely no history of anything like this, with this one he said-she said exception of course.
When it is all said and done and the chips have settled and no one can be found to corroborate either side, well with the exception of Mark Judge of course who Ford has said was there and he has already denied it, except him of course. What do you suggest we do, take years of public service and throw it away because of 36 year old unsubstantiated allegations?
What do you propose we do, derail someone who all the professionals, liberal and conservative, has said is one the most qualified jurist serving today because of this? I just want to make sure that is what you are proposing, because if it is, then be careful what you wish for. Just like Harry Reid breaking the filibuster, this tactic too can come back on you.