Yeah, ZING! You got me. I've got burns so deep I'm going to need me a Tarly to cut away the dead flesh.
I can see why some of the Safe Spacers wanted their own forums devoid of a politics section. You've had an account here for a couple years now and I can't recall ever seeing you post before. I thought I'd already encountered the resident potatoes, but you're a new one for me! Yay for that?
Now, let's see if I can put this in terms you'll comprehend. I'll probably fail, but that can't really be put on me can it?
If you move all the horribly offensive things into a museum, the sensitive people will not stop crying about them. Their (the objects) very existence is an affront to their (the people) morality. I'm sorry, I feel as if I may have gotten off of the Thomas the Train track there.
What I mean is that they will STILL be offended by the statues. Rather than wanting them removed from outside of buildings, in parks, etc, they will then want to protest and/or boycott these horrible museums that would then be housing the offending objects. They will eventually petition and demand that the museums remove these offensive objects.
Can you imagine how these poor, sensitive little souls would feel if they had to
pay* money (stamped with the faces of nigger-hating-slave-owning folk, no less! Oh, the humanity!) to enter a museum and then be forced to see such atrocious objects?
* Not all museums charge an entrance fee. Do not get hung up on the minutia.
I want to say this again for you. The very existence of these objects is a problem for the people wanting them removed. Changing their location will not solve anything.