I'm aware of what I quoted. I'm also aware that I've said on numerous occasions that the crime is conspiracy. Yes, the Trump campaign and Russia colluded, but no one is going to charge them with that as it's not a legal term. Conspiracy is what the charges are going to be.
Do you mean to say, Napolitano, the person Fox News pays specifically for his insight into judicial proceedings? To you, and the rest of the Trump Defense Force, NeverTrumper is a euphemism for "person who dares to point out that the emperor has no clothes."
Isn't it weird how all the people at Fox who are paid to report the news -- instead of "entertainment," like Sean Hannity -- are coming to recognize Trump's legal peril and general unfitness? Have fun doubling down, covering your ears and consoling yourself with the thought-terminating cliche of "NeverTrumper," though. I'm sure that'll be an effective defense for Trump et. al in court.
You were the one who threw it out. Right there. Right after saying that it wasn't something that was illegal, thus answering your own question about why someone might say "so what?", within minutes of the original post.
You're the only one saying anything about it right now. It started and ended with you. Don't try to drag other people into your stupidity just because you got caught being an idiot again.
If you had a $1 for every time one of the MAGAbots here has said something about no collusion you'd have enough $$ to buy a 10x DB. Your painfully obvious attempts are trolling are pathetic. It's even right there in the quote I posted, there's collusion but the crime itself is called conspiracy. Do try and keep up will you?
Last edited by Androidpk; 01-10-2019 at 11:14 AM.
You contradicted yourself with two posts literally within fifteen minutes of one another, where you were the only one talking. I'll tell you once again that pointing out that you fail to cite, research or grasp things on a very basic level is not akin to trolling.
At this point I'd be surprised to see you say something correct, even if you didn't explicitly cite a source for it. If you're at a point where "everybody is a troll but me", which you seem to be at, it would behoove you to take a look at yourself rather than everybody else.
If you'd like an example of a troll post, here you go. I'm still waiting on you to cite literally any evidence of what was said here:
There you go. Zero content. Zero correct statements. Only made in an failed attempt to anger another party. That's what a troll post is.