That will happen any day now.
Except, as always, you remain completely divorced from reality, and there was no "spy" -- much to your obvious dismay.
Tom Rooney, Republican on the House Intelligence Committee:
"What is the point of saying that there was a spy in the campaign when there was none? You know what I’m saying? It’s like, ‘Lets create this thing to tweet about, knowing that it’s not true.’ … Maybe it’s just to create more chaos but it doesn’t really help the case." Source.
Trey "King of Benghazi" Gowdy, Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, post briefing, to Fox News:
"I am even more convinced that the FBI did exactly what my fellow citizens would want them to do. It has nothing to do with Donald Trump."
House Speaker Ryan:
"Gowdy's initial assessment is accurate. I've seen no evidence to the contrary."
Senate Majority Leader McConnell:
"I support both (the OIG and Mueller investigations), and I don't really have anything to add to this subject based upon the Gang of Eight briefing that we had today, which was classified."
Reality continues to be so embarrassing and inconvenient to you. But that's what happens when you take the cheeto-in-chief's Twitter rants at face value.
That's a dumbfounding response.
Trump had at least 4 different stated reasons for firing Comey that changed- at one point- within hours. Do you actually not remember this?
And at the end- he was on national television clearly stating he did it because of the Russia investigation. Do you actually not remember this either?
This is exactly my point.
Spoiler Alert: The next paragraph of the article you quoted -- which you conveniently didn't continue with -- says: "but there is no evidence that Clinton herself or her campaign spread the story."
Not only is there absolutely no evidence that anyone in the Clinton campaign spread the birther nonsense, the "evidence" the Trump campaign tried to cite in favor of it never brings up anything remotely relevant. And more than that, even if you could somehow demonstrate that Clinton was responsible for it, she never touted the issue -- unlike Trump, who literally conned retarded conservatives about it on Twitter for years.
Your own mostly-delusional article confirms the IPAB -- which still wasn't "a death panel" -- never had a single appointment. All IPAB had the power to do, even if it had been filled, was to make recommendations to Congress. If anything, opposition to IPAB demonstrates the hypocrisy that supposedly "fiscally conservative" Republicans have.Originally Posted by Neveragain
Ooh! How inconvenient for you -- Trump's handpicked NASA administrator, himself a climate change skeptic Republican congressman from Oklahoma appointed in April -- just announced that he now understands and accepts climate science:Originally Posted by Neveragain
NASA administrator Bridenstein, testifying before Congress: “The National Climate Assessment, that includes NASA, and it includes the Department of Energy, and it includes NOAA, has clearly stated it is extremely likely, [that] is the language they use, that human activity is the dominant cause of global warming, and I have no reason to doubt the science that comes from that.” Bridenstine said.
Senator Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii): “Is it fair to call this an evolution of your views?”
Bridenstine: “Yes.”
Source.
Too bad "collusion" has already been established, by Trump Jr's own admission on Twitter, no less. Did you forget about the 70+ criminal charges that have been filed, resulting in a half-dozen guilty pleas already? Stay tuned, my delusional friend.Originally Posted by Neveragain