Hasta pronto, porque la vida no termina aqui...
America, stop pushing. I know what I'm doing.
Death Valley is part of Parts Known, which is the opposite of Parts Unknown.
SEE?!!?!?!?!?!?!?!? WE KNOW WHERE DEATH VALLEY IS!!!!!
UPDATE: Some archaeologists have potentially discovered the location of Parts Unknown. Apparently it's in Wisconsin.
"After doing some extensive research, I've actually found Parts Unknown," he boldly stated. "It's not in Nepal, it's not in the Fiji Islands … it's actually right next to Sheboygan, Wisconsin. It's Parts Unknown, Wisconsin."
http://www.wwe.com/inside/news/partsunknown
I know this is legitimate because they have a Facebook page:
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Parts...00390793336065
Last edited by Methais; 10-23-2017 at 08:52 AM.
Trump's transgender military ban got shot down today in federal court.
Plaintiffs are current and aspiring service members who are transgender. Many have years of experience in the military. Some have decades. They have been deployed on active duty in Iraq and Afghanistan. They have and continue to serve with distinction. All fear that the directives of the Presidential Memorandum will have devastating impacts on their careers and their families. They have moved the Court to enjoin the directives of the Presidential Memorandum, believing that these directives violate the fundamental guarantees of due process afforded by the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
...
The Memorandum unequivocally directs the military to prohibit indefinitely the accession of transgender individuals and to authorize their discharge.
...
The Court holds that Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on their Fifth Amendment claim. As a form of government action that classifies people based on their gender identity, and disfavors a class of historically persecuted and politically powerless individuals, the President’s directives are subject to a fairly searching form of scrutiny. Plaintiffs claim that the President’s directives cannot survive such scrutiny because they are not genuinely based on legitimate concerns regarding military effectiveness or budget constraints, but are instead driven by a desire to express disapproval of transgender people generally. The Court finds that a number of factors— including the sheer breadth of the exclusion ordered by the directives, the unusual circumstances surrounding the President’s announcement of them, the fact that the reasons given for them do not appear to be supported by any facts, and the recent rejection of those reasons by the military itself—strongly suggest that Plaintiffs’ Fifth Amendment claim is meritorious.
Serving in the Military is not a right so the due process defense is crap. Likely though, it will pass through our courts just fine because many in them have long since abandoned the actual law.
I asked for neither your Opinion,
your Acceptance
nor your Permission.
"The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis." Dante Alighieri 3
"It took 2000 mules to install one Jackass." Diamond and Silk Watch the Movie
Just like his travel bans this one had no merit at all.
Again, courts ignoring the law.
I asked for neither your Opinion,
your Acceptance
nor your Permission.
"The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis." Dante Alighieri 3
"It took 2000 mules to install one Jackass." Diamond and Silk Watch the Movie
It'll hit a higher court. Honestly, I'm not against trannies in the military, so long as it is proven that it doesn't effect readiness due to non-deployable status and so long as the military isn't footing the bill for anything having to do with them being trannies. Also, they are considered the sex on their original birth certificate.
Last edited by Gelston; 10-30-2017 at 11:08 PM.