34 years of service and McMaster gets run off. He kept his uniform on this last year for nothing.
One by one the adults on the room are getting the axe and the children of the corn are taking power
34 years of service and McMaster gets run off. He kept his uniform on this last year for nothing.
One by one the adults on the room are getting the axe and the children of the corn are taking power
Last edited by cwolff; 03-22-2018 at 09:35 PM.
You had better pay your guild dues before you forget. You are 113 months behind.
My libertarian friend wouldn't vote for Hillary because shes a war monger. He preferred trump. Other people said that war monger stuff too of course. I am morbidly curious to see how this ends up because I felt like trump was pretty open about his desire or readiness to wage war
Last edited by cwolff; 03-22-2018 at 10:53 PM.
Ooh Rah. That's a great attitude for them to have and all the more reason the civilians in charge need to be level headed. I do imagine though that the military members still in service who have been deploying a lot aren't looking forward to the next war too much. They've got to be a bit war weary.
Another legal blow to Trump and his organizations.
When is the last time a sitting US Federal judge has called out a sitting US President for being overtly racist?
Citing President Trump’s “racially charged language,” a federal judge in Brooklyn ruled on Thursday that a lawsuit seeking to preserve a program that protects hundreds of thousands of young undocumented immigrants from deportation could continue.
The order, by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis of Federal District Court in Brooklyn, was the strongest sign so far of judicial support for the program known as DACA, or Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, which has for months been the subject of a heated debate in Congress.
In October, lawyers for the Justice Department filed a motion to dismiss the Brooklyn lawsuit, claiming that the plaintiffs in the case — a coalition of immigration lawyers and a group of Democratic state attorneys general — had failed to make a persuasive case that DACA was rolled back in September because of a racial animus toward Latinos.
But in his order rejecting the motion to dismiss, Judge Garaufis pointed directly at Mr. Trump, noting that his numerous “racial slurs” and “epithets” — both as a candidate and from the White House — had created a “plausible inference” that the decision to end DACA violated the equal protection clause of the Constitution.