Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 26

Thread: What the death of Freedom really looks like

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    In amazement
    Posts
    6,912

    Default What the death of Freedom really looks like

    So apparently there is this "activist" reporter type guy in the UK named Tommy Robinson and he was reporting or commentating or something on the trial of some Muslims accused of grooming children for rape and or the sex trafficking trade. The police arrested him and apparently the news in the UK has been told not to report on it. This of course is what real authoritarianism looks like and what happens to people when they don't have a 1st and 2nd Amendment. If you post here, and have Facebook, you might not be safe traveling to Europe if you go through the UK, they seem to think it ok to quash reporters and arrest you for Facebook posts. And idiot Liberals/Socialists think Trump is authoritarian calling CNN fake news.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-a8368821.html

    https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/637664...rooming-trial/

    This is of course after London has starting arresting people for kitchen cutlery and scissors as well as confiscating vegetable peelers because knife crime is on the rise and this will of reduce it instead of dealing with the lawless bands of migrant youth and the no-go areas.
    I asked for neither your Opinion,
    your Acceptance
    nor your Permission.

    "The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis." Dante Alighieri 3
    "It took 2000 mules to install one Jackass." Diamond and Silk Watch the Movie

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    34,071
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default

    The UK has always had an Authoritarian lean.
    Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

  3. #3

    Default

    Your hero was already on probation for this and he violated that probation. Did you even read the article? He was violating laws they have in place to protect court proceedings from interference. Fuck! You're head is not just to hang a hat. Use that noodle a little bit

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    In amazement
    Posts
    6,912

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cwolff View Post
    Your hero was already on probation for this and he violated that probation. Did you even read the article? He was violating laws they have in place to protect court proceedings from interference. Fuck! You're head is not just to hang a hat. Use that noodle a little bit
    He had a suspended sentence for contempt of court and all indications say he was doing nothing to earn a charge of "breaching the peace" which is what he was arrested for. Did you even read the article? If you are standing outside, making no ruckus while live streaming in a public area, then how can you be breaching the peace? Seriously, do you have any idea what the concept of trumped up charges are? Imagine if this had been done to some pesky turd like Brian Stelter in the US or maybe Rachael Maddow?
    I asked for neither your Opinion,
    your Acceptance
    nor your Permission.

    "The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis." Dante Alighieri 3
    "It took 2000 mules to install one Jackass." Diamond and Silk Watch the Movie

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~ View Post
    He had a suspended sentence for contempt of court and all indications say he was doing nothing to earn a charge of "breaching the peace" which is what he was arrested for. Did you even read the article? If you are standing outside, making no ruckus while live streaming in a public area, then how can you be breaching the peace? Seriously, do you have any idea what the concept of trumped up charges are? Imagine if this had been done to some pesky turd like Brian Stelter in the US or maybe Rachael Maddow?
    “This is not about free speech, not about the freedom of the press, nor about legitimate journalism, and not about political correctness,” the judge told Robinson at the time

    “It is about justice and ensuring that a trial can be carried out justly and fairly, it’s about being innocent until proven guilty.

    “It is about preserving the integrity of the jury to continue without people being intimidated or being affected by irresponsible and inaccurate ‘reporting’, if that’s what it was.”

    That's from your article. He had a suspended sentence for breaking UK law protecting their jury system and trials.

    If you must be outraged there is plenty here for you to fight against. Philando Castiles killing for example. That's closer to home and he is dead now. Not just getting some slap on the wrist like your UK wing nut. Border patrol stopping women for speaking spanish. That's an American outrage you can be up in arms about. Trump interfering with an investigation and generally lying his ass off everyday and playing golf; that's an outrage. No need to go so afield.

    Also, you're judgements about UK law mean shit. Did you ever consider they don't want their jurors getting filmed for extremist tv? They are protecting their legal system and your boy is willfully ignoring that.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    In amazement
    Posts
    6,912

    Default

    How do you have a free and fair trial if you have it behind closed doors? You know you can go into pretty much any court room in America and sit in the back and watch the trial unless the Judge seals the court for something like a minor's testimony. Also, he wasn't in the court, he was outside on the street. Jurors don't go in and out of the court by the front door dumbass. This is about freedom of the press and free speech, both of which the UK doesn't have.

    The UK police and other officials have been turning their head in the face of crime by immigrants for decades because of Liberal white guilt. They are covering for shit and just like that rich drunk fuck that raped the girl and got 3 months, they, meaning the police/judge/politicians in this case need to be dragged out into the light of day and either shown as the process working correctly for once or exposed as the cockroaches they are so that maybe justice can be served. I tend to side with this being a political arrest.

    The rest of your spewage isn't worth the time to type a reply.
    I asked for neither your Opinion,
    your Acceptance
    nor your Permission.

    "The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis." Dante Alighieri 3
    "It took 2000 mules to install one Jackass." Diamond and Silk Watch the Movie

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~ View Post
    How do you have a free and fair trial if you have it behind closed doors? You know you can go into pretty much any court room in America and sit in the back and watch the trial unless the Judge seals the court for something like a minor's testimony. Also, he wasn't in the court, he was outside on the street. Jurors don't go in and out of the court by the front door dumbass. This is about freedom of the press and free speech, both of which the UK doesn't have.

    The UK police and other officials have been turning their head in the face of crime by immigrants for decades because of Liberal white guilt. They are covering for shit and just like that rich drunk fuck that raped the girl and got 3 months, they, meaning the police/judge/politicians in this case need to be dragged out into the light of day and either shown as the process working correctly for once or exposed as the cockroaches they are so that maybe justice can be served. I tend to side with this being a political arrest.

    The rest of your spewage isn't worth the time to type a reply.
    HAHAHA, you just made that shit up. "Jurors don't go in the door dumbass" So let's get this straight. You post some shit online from a whack job English right winger and all the sudden you've a barrister over-ruling an actual British judge. Consider for one second that maybe you don't know what you're talking about. Just consider it. Don't lose you're crazy confidence, simply consider that maybe you don't know everything.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    In amazement
    Posts
    6,912

    Default

    So, a little more news on the case. Tommy Robinson has already been tried and convicted and the judge has imposed a reporting ban on it. So basically he was tried and convicted in under a day and they made it illegal to report on his arrest, trial or conviction. And idiots like cwolff don't think there is some judicial hanky panky or government trying to cover shit up going on? Hell, it will take years to put Weinstein away and most trials for the average person in the US and the UK take months if not years even if they are politically motivated. This one is over and done in the same afternoon?

    Judge Geoffrey Marson QC who sentenced Tommy Robinson to 13 months in prison and imposed a reporting ban on it.

    The same judge quashed a conviction against a man for downloading indecent images of children in 2009 - see https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...l-1227244.html

    Tommy, having initially been told he was being arrested for breach of the peace on Friday was then convicted - on the same afternoon and within an eyebrow raising short space of time - of contempt of court for 'prejudicing the outcome of the trial'. That is utter nonsense. The men accused of child rape on Friday were attending court to be handed down their sentence. The trial was already over. Tommy was on public land. He did not enter inside the court and he reported directly to his Facebook livestream.

    Conversely, this is a link to an ongoing child sex abuse trial where BBC News have in fact prejudiced the outcome of an ongoing trial by quoting a lawyer for the accused in the headline of their article, stating: ''Rotherham child sexual abuse claim 'made up to boost EDL cause''' implying that the defence counsel's submission was a statement of fact: http://www.bbc.co.uk/ne…/uk-england-south-yorkshire-44208512
    Reposted from Facebook.

    Corroborated by https://www.therebel.media/ezra_levant_show_may_25_2018

    and http://www.foxnews.com/world/2018/05...ing-trial.html
    I asked for neither your Opinion,
    your Acceptance
    nor your Permission.

    "The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis." Dante Alighieri 3
    "It took 2000 mules to install one Jackass." Diamond and Silk Watch the Movie

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Ohai, NZ
    Posts
    7,534
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    THERE'S A BAN ON REPORTING ABOUT IT.

    Links two UK sources in the original post.

  10. #10

    Default

    You're working so hard to make a conspiracy theory out of this one asshole in England when you've got trump pissing in your face telling you its rain right here.

    Your selective moral outrage is fucked up.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-23-2016, 12:56 AM
  2. Unaltered death mask(death features)
    By shad0ws0ngs in forum Auctions
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 12-11-2014, 12:10 PM
  3. Freedom
    By senorgordoburro in forum Off-Topic
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 06-07-2013, 12:05 PM
  4. Death Recovery vs. Death's Sting
    By CrystalTears in forum Gemstone News
    Replies: 55
    Last Post: 10-25-2004, 10:55 AM
  5. Freedom
    By Blazing247 in forum Social Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-31-2004, 06:08 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •