Things that made you laugh today (Political Version)

[Gelston]

Judge Grants CNN’s Motion to Restore Jim Acosta’s White House Press Pass.

Suck it, Trump

And before any Trumptards cry about activist liberal judges just know this judge was appointed by Trump.

Luckily, it can be appealed.

They're already saying it'll probably hit the Supreme Court, because it is a separation or power issue. Can the Judiciary tell the Executive what to do with their press pool? Another argument, there are limited seats in there.

All else fails, just assign his seat at the rear and never call on him.

[Methais]

All else fails, just assign his seat at the rear and never call on him.

I hope Trump does this because that will trigger Acosta and the rest of these tards more than being banned from the WH.

Judge Grants CNN’s Motion to Restore Jim Acosta’s White House Press Pass.

Suck it, Trump

And before any Trumptards cry about activist liberal judges just know this judge was appointed by Trump.

You're stupid.

[Parkbandit]

All else fails, just assign his seat at the rear and never call on him.

Exactly. President Trump should have never called on him to begin with.

[Methais]

This is probably gonna get wrecked in SCOTUS or wherever it ends up. Trump isn't banning CNN, the organization that Acosta represents, from the White House, so I don't see how making a "freedom of the press" argument is going to hold up.

And if it does, then what's to stop every reporter in the universe from demanding WH access simply because they're "the press"?

Didn't Obama ban some reporter from the WH at some point too?

[Gelston]

Sorry, not sorry.

[Methais]

Sorry, not sorry.

[Androidpk]

[Wrathbringer]

You're a huge retard. And thief.

[BriarFox]

The judge shot Trump's revocation of Acosta's press pass down on the basis of the 5th Amendment's due process clause. Basically, he thought Trump's reasons were junk (which they were, even the WH backed off calling the interaction "assault"). Trump should be able to dismiss a disruptive reporter, but the issue is whether Acosta was legitimately disruptive or whether Trump just doesn't like him and should be able to revoke credentials based on that. The WH is a public institution and needs to make itself available to the press, and not just the reporters it likes.

[Methais]

The judge shot Trump's revocation of Acosta's press pass down on the basis of the 5th Amendment's due process clause. Basically, he thought Trump's reasons were junk (which they were, even the WH backed off calling the interaction "assault"). Trump should be able to dismiss a disruptive reporter, but the issue is whether Acosta was legitimately disruptive or whether Trump just doesn't like him and should be able to revoke credentials based on that. The WH is a public institution and needs to make itself available to the press, and not just the reporters it likes.

I never considered it assault, but only a true tard would consider it as not being disruptive, especially when he was still barking out bullshit after another reporter was given the mic and was trying to ask their question.

I hope he gets to stay and Trump just never calls on him ever.