Exhausting Court Proceedings on the Horizon

[Suppressed Poet]

This is correct.

Seran totally believes Biden’s story that his uncle was eaten alive by cannibals.

[Seran]

Drowsy Donald.

[ClydeR]

Trump's lawyer told the jury in court yesterday that Trump did not reimburse Cohen for the hush money payments. That is contrary to Giuliani's 2018 statement in an interview with Sean Hannity in which Giuliana said the payment to Daniels was funneled through a law firm and then Trump personally repaid it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qY0qiQYcDqk

[ClydeR]

Trump's lawyer told the jury in court yesterday that Trump did not reimburse Cohen for the hush money payments.

Giuliani is not the only person who, in 2018, issued public statements that conflict with what Trump's attorney told the jury in opening remarks on Monday of this week, when Trump's attorney said Trump did not reimburse Cohen for the payments Cohen made to Stormy Daniels.

https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/...92302267785216

All of Trump's tweets on that day about this issue arranged in readable order..

Mr. Cohen, an attorney, received a monthly retainer, not from the campaign and having nothing to do with the campaign, from which he entered into, through reimbursement, a private contract between two parties, known as a non-disclosure agreement, or NDA. These agreements are very common among celebrities and people of wealth. In this case it is in full force and effect and will be used in Arbitration for damages against Ms. Clifford (Daniels). The agreement was used to stop the false and extortionist accusations made by her about an affair, despite already having signed a detailed letter admitting that there was no affair. Prior to its violation by Ms. Clifford and her attorney, this was a private agreement. Money from the campaign, or campaign contributions, played no roll in this transaction.

[Methais]

Drowsy Donald.

You spent all week coming up with that.

Low effort loser.

[Anebriated]

Its looking like the supreme court is likely to rule in favor of the constitution and only official actions will be covered by immunity. This should put an end to most of the bogus cases against Trump. It also leaves open the ability to bring charges to treasonous acts by former presidents. The legal precedents being set by all of the cases against Trump will play a major part in the next few years.

[Suppa Hobbit Mage]

Shillary would have just had the porn star killed.

[Anebriated]

Interestingly enough, hardcore lefty justice Sotomayor asked the question "If the president decides that his rival is a corrupt person and orders the military to assassinate him, is that within the official acts for which he can get immunity?". So far they seem to be in agreement that it would be considered an official act. Seems like they are telegraphing their plan.

[Neveragain]

Its looking like the supreme court is likely to rule in favor of the constitution and only official actions will be covered by immunity. This should put an end to most of the bogus cases against Trump. It also leaves open the ability to bring charges to treasonous acts by former presidents. The legal precedents being set by all of the cases against Trump will play a major part in the next few years.

Let me simplify this for the Seranites:

[Neveragain]

Jack is really upset.