Search:

When willfulness, ie knowledge, is a necessary element, it is relevant. You are certainly welcome to your opinion that you don’t believe it, but them coming and reviewing the documents there multiple...

I didn’t read that EO the same way (that there’s a procedure for the President). The procedures are for the various agencies, hence the appeal procedure with the President as the final arbiter. This...

I don’t know, I tend to think the stuff Trump is ignorant of could almost be squeezed into the Grand Canyon. That’s why I have a hard time believing this is some sort of intentional, nefarious scheme...

You keep claiming that he “fought” to keep the records for 15 months, what exactly was he doing to fight them? Simply ignoring them is not an affirmative act. Given that the primary statute cited...

Jesus, your cluelessness is astounding.

Dude, you genuinely have no clue what you’re talking about. Pro tip, go back one additional section to 17.1 - Purpose. You’re quoting the wrong reg… again.

You’re quoting a reg that applies to information maintained by the Dept. of Justice. The perfect call was information maintained by the Office of the President. You’re quoting the wrong reg.

ETA:...

Let me make sure I’m understanding you correctly. Your position is that he allowed FBI agents access to his property on multiple occasions in order to review and retrieve documents and you think he...

I think you’re quoting the wrong part of the cfr. You definitely are as it pertains to the “perfect call.”

I thought I had read that agents from the National Archives went down there multiple times to review and retrieve documents. Wouldn’t that tend to show that he wasn’t intentionally refusing to hand...

The second paragraph and the conclusion.

I think this is a pretty big overstatement, too.

I think that’s a pretty gross overstatement. First, there would have to be knowledge. A close second is that it can’t just be anything, it has to be federal property.

It’s significantly more intelligent than just making shit up like you do.

I’ll ask you the same thing, why not?

Taking the snark out, I’m curious what you’re basing your opinion on. Do you believe an administration can not classify or declassify anything not protected by federal statute?

Maybe indirectly. I think you’re giving this administration more credit than it deserves as to its ability to affect the market.

Just my opinion, but I think they see this as a feature, and not a problem. Using exorbitant gas prices to push electric vehicles. “See what I did for the environment? People are burning far less...

I think y’all are missing the forest for the trees here. The way it was explained to me is that even if all the drilling commenced today, there would be virtually no impact on the gasoline market in...

Not if there is asportation, speaking of hair splitting.

I disagree with that assessment because kidnapping has nothing to do with the wishes or rights of a parent (not just kids can be kidnapped after all) whereas the other offense does, that’s the...

I get what you’re saying and you’re right that they are very similar and in the general sense the terms are used synonymously. Maybe we’re arguing semantics. There is a very distinct difference,...

Again, maybe in your state, I don’t pretend to know the nuances of LA law. In GA crossing are state line is the difference between a misdemeanor and a felony interference with custody because parents...

Damn, 20 weeks is impressive.

Sure it is, but it’s not kidnapping.