>This statement makes me sad in my heart. You've learned nothing. :(
Don't you understand you're trying to prove a point to someone who is blatantly trolling?
Printable View
>This statement makes me sad in my heart. You've learned nothing. :(
Don't you understand you're trying to prove a point to someone who is blatantly trolling?
I would ask if you wanted to quote me saying there was "rampant racism", but of course you're not going to. Who needs proof when you know you're right, eh? We've spoken before about how as humans our memory is imperfect, and if I had any doubts about your protestations to the contrary this would neatly assuage them.You're not sure why Obama keeps coming up... in a conversation that started in a thread titled "Obama empirically better President than Reagan"...?Quote:
Obama has jack dick to do with any of this. I'm not even sure why that's a recurring theme in this conversation.
The buck stops here ± 6.18 inches at 95% confidence. [1]Quote:
I'll buy in to it, though...in your comparisons of GDP growth, inflation, and unemployment...where does the direct role of the President fall into your calculations? How do you quantify that? Is it just a byproduct, or are you calculating their active role in the outcome?
That's not at all what my numbers showed. I get that sometimes my language gets a little convoluted, but this isn't one of those times. Quote: "The average in this span is 3.07% real GDP growth, so we can also see at what points inflation predicts below-average growth using the same formula and we find 0.9% and 7.4%. Inflation under Obama has averaged 1.6%, therefore inflation under Obama is not too low." You said inflation had a parabolic effect on GDP growth, I quantified that phenomenon for you, you got huffy because the actual numbers didn't turn out to be where you needed them to be to score points. So huffy you tried to blast me with a source that said I was 100% correct, so huffy you dismiss the concept of empirical economics entirely (in blatant contradiction to actual economists)... or is that all "revisionist history" too? :)Quote:
It's not "egregious" to graph GDP against inflation, it's futile. As your own numbers have shown. There's no conclusion that can be drawn from it that means anything, quantitatively.
Citations
[1] Truman (1952) Presidential Address. Proc. of the Nat'l War College, 6 pp. 1-2.
I get why Thondalar is incapable of remembering the past, he's a human. I get why Warriorbird refuses to read the studies I linked, because their evidence is unequivocal. I don't get why you keep saying I'm trolling. Every definition of trolling I know about requires dishonesty, what are you accusing me of being dishonest about?
Shut up Latrin.
Almost 50 pages of you shitting in my thread and you question beong a troll. Go fuck yourself.
Y'know, Latrin is an 'e' away from being a hole for pooping. Just remember that when you begin to take him seriously.
And I've asked you to post your crap in your own thread if you're so interested about your supposed negative side effects. You won't though, so you're a fucktwit.