Originally Posted by
time4fun
Yeah, me and the ABA. We both just take these allegations seriously enough for an investigation out of pure political malice. I love how one man's denial has more weight than the accusations of three women- all of whom were calling for an FBI investigation. (people making up stories do NOT call for FBI investigations)
The only reason why people are pretending like it's not a big deal is because they want him on the Court- as though there are no other conservative SCOTUS candidates out there who haven't faced three credible sexual misconduct allegations, committees perjury during their confirmation hearings, and who have launched into blatant partisan attacks.
So yes, someone lying under oath during a defense of one of three allegations of sexual misconduct is disqualifying. And in any situation where three alleged victims are calling for an FBI investigation, and the accused looks terrified by the notion, lies under oath about it, and tries to deflect with blatant partisan conspiracy theories- yeah, I'm going to say there's a problem.