Let's see how this goes.
Printable View
Let's see how this goes.
Pleasantly surprised by the appointment. He is, in my opinion, a moderate conservative.
I imagine lots of folks on both sides are going to be less than happy, but to both I say that it could be a lot worse.
And interesting thing: In 2009, Kavanaugh wrote an article for the Minnesota Law Review where he argued that U.S. Presidents should be exempt from “time-consuming and distracting” lawsuits and investigations, which “would ill serve the public interest, especially in times of financial or national security crisis.”
Did this play a role? Who knows. Probably. One thing, though, he did say he wouldn't mess with Roe v Wade, so that should help him with Democrats.
Oh I think he will mess with Roe vs Wade in the sense of favoring restrictions, but not a complete repeal. He will do to abortions much like what was done with “gun control” during the Clinton era.
The way I see it all playing... I think they won't try to touch Roe v Wade until they replace RBG after she retires following the 2020 reelection.
I don't know. I haven't been around for the majority of the Presidents we've had to compare.
https://i.imgur.com/qMb3RzA.png
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DhtXQHlVQAAvMZQ.jpg:large
:lol:
can't wait to see cwolff's meltdowns this week
He should, of course, be given the same amount of respect and attention as Merrick Garland.
Deported. Both of you. The country of the day is Burundi.
Amen Brother!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYa2rw4cY8w
https://media2.giphy.com/media/d2lcHJTG5Tscg/200.gif
Not because I'm a sorcerer though, just because of my shitty bolts.
Because sorcerers do things like this:
https://i.makeagif.com/media/8-23-2015/cLrj-2.gif
It's like you have no idea what you are speaking of. Shocker.
Here.. THIS is why it's called the Joe Biden Rule.. not the "OMG MCCONNELL IS PULLING EXCUSES OUT OF HIS ASS!!!"
Get educated:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1SUn0zTGUQ
This has nothing to do with abortion and everything to do with Trump trying to stack the court with someone who will protect him against Mueller and the OSC.
So the latest scuttlebutt I've been reading from the mainstream news is Brett totally sounds like the name of someone who belongs to a fraternity, oh and Brett bought baseball tickets on his credit cards then paid off the credit cards with his own money.
Surely the Democrats have stopped the next would be Hitler already with this hard hitting journalism.
Great now Democrats are racist against people named Brett. I wonder if this includes people named Bret. Like Bret Baier. Or Bret Hart. These cunts better not fuck with Bret Hart or it’s sharpshooters for everyone. I wonder if this will affect George Brett.
And how the hell did they frame him paying off his CC with his own money as a bad thing?
So THAT'S why the Democrats are against this nominee when they would have supported any other nominee President Trump put in front of them..................
Let's just say that I would believe you didn't steal shit off msconstrew's account before I would believe this excuse.
Now get back to getting your "lawyer" to subpoena those pesky little IP's from Kranar.
GOOD LUCK GETTING CONFIRMED NOW OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG
https://scontent.fbtr1-1.fna.fbcdn.n...d7&oe=5BDE26FF
God forbid anyone use a credit card and then pay it off using their own money.
The best part about this story is how the headlines act as if their journalists engaged in some major fact finding investigations, dug through pages and pages of documents, and interviewed countless witnesses before arriving at the truth, when in reality the White House willingly released this information pretty much on day 1. But it doesn't sound as juicy if the White House released this information without being forced to.
Fact is, that list has been out since Trump came into office. Everyone on there has been vetted. You may hate their decisions and politics, but they are pretty much going to be clean everywhere else.
This is Brett Butler
https://comedycentral.mtvnimages.com...=360&crop=true
This is also Brett Butler
https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon....HL._SY445_.jpg
Confirmed Brett Kavanaugh is gender fluid and the left are being bigots.
This is good news for Republicans. It means that Kavanaugh won't be able to retire early.
Quote:
Supreme Court nominee Brett M. Kavanaugh incurred tens of thousands of dollars of credit card debt buying baseball tickets over the past decade and at times reported liabilities that could have exceeded the value of his cash accounts and investment assets, according to a review of Kavanaugh’s financial disclosures and information provided by the White House.
White House spokesman Raj Shah told The Washington Post that Kavanaugh built up the debt by buying Washington Nationals season tickets and tickets for playoff games for himself and a “handful” of friends. Shah said some of the debts were also for home improvements.
More...
Quote:
Kavanaugh’s most recent financial disclosure forms reveal reportable assets between $15,000 and $65,000, which would put him at the bottom of the financial ranking of justices, most of whom list well over $1 million in assets. The value of residences is not subject to disclosure, and Shah added that Kavanaugh has a government retirement account worth nearly half a million dollars that also was not required to be disclosed.
This was a bad pick. He chose someone from the establishment.
This could affect the midterms.
So, this is something I ran across. I can't account for its truthfulness or any of that. For those that don't know, the people at the Senate Hearing who were disruptive get a $50 fine. They can come back after paying.
https://scontent.fmem1-2.fna.fbcdn.n...c4&oe=5BF35B1B
I want to know how he paid off all his debt so quickly. I also want to know what Harris knows regarding a possible conversation re: Mueller.
Eh- if he bought a bunch of tickets for friends then maybe they just paid him back.
I do agree with the latter point- that matters.
I also don't want anyone on the Court who argues that remedying social discrimination is NOT a compelling state interest. And I REALLY don't want someone on the Court who has a history of perjuring himself in confirmation hearings.
It's a conclusion drawn by your posts and the sudden declaration of anti-wealth stance. Also, let's not pretend that you occupy space in my head at any realistic level. I come here, respond, we have what I loosely consider a conversation and you're out of sight out of mind.
If I occupy any consideration in your mind, kindly end it. I don't want to be remotely close to that head space you'd call a mind.
Edit: I'd call it a prison. Sorry, had to edit some stuff. Still not fully awake.
Really? I didn't realize I had been posting about what's going on with my brother right now. The last thing I mentioned was that- like a LOT of undocumented immigrants right now- he was too afraid to do anything that would register him as such in any Federal system. That was about a year and a half ago. Now I know you aren't magically talking to my brother because, if you were, you wouldn't be making such ridiculous statements.
And which post of mine stated I make more money than everyone else? You'll find a post of mine saying that I pay more in taxes than most people make in this country, and that's factually accurate- whether you're comfortable with that or not. And, by the way, it was in the context of me arguing that we should be raising taxes on the wealthy, not lowering them. .
My "anti-wealth" stance is actually me being critical of the fact that our government is largely run by people who make more than 99% of the population. And, as just mentioned, it's definitely not a "sudden declaration". I've been talking about income inequality on these boards for years.
So, it would appear as though you aren't actually basing any of this on fact. I guess you felt you had run out of facts to use and had to fall back on imagination instead.
Here's why:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BCfN7B0ugU
Here's why:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BCfN7B0ugU
BECAUSE IT'S NOT FAIR!!!!!!!!!!!! THIS WAS SUPPOSED TO BE HILLARY'S PRESIDENCY!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I HATE TRUMP!!!!!!!! I HAVE BEEN SO UPSET FOR ALMOST 2 YEARS NOW AND I CAN'T AFFORD TO GET MY XANAX REFILLED UNTIL NEXT MONTH WHEN I GET MY DISABILITY CHECK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ALSO, I'M RICHER THAN EVERYONE ON HERE COMBINED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Oh. Look at that.
https://i.imgur.com/RG0BS1U.gif
Will time4fun become time4scrub?
https://media.giphy.com/media/6qoZdlNvxB64E/giphy.gif
Um, Tgo honey- you do understand that the quote feature of the forums links to the original post you're quoting, right?
"We pay more in taxes than most of the folks on this forum take home in income every year"
Was from http://forum.gsplayers.com/showthrea...57#post1843057
And the FULL quote was:
in response to:
In a thread titled: "How High Are Your Taxes"
And "I probably make more than all of you" was in directed specifically at a small group of people who were laughing it up about how un-marketable a Feminist Studies degree was:
They earned their snarky reply, and I stand by it.
I stand by mine. I bet that job market is shit. And I think you are full of shit.
So....you did say you probably make more money than everyone here and you did say you pay more in taxes than most people here earn every year...but you think the context means the posts were justified and somehow means you didn't say these things?
Whatever school you taught logic at really should ask for their money back because clearly you didn't teach anything of value.
So what definition of snarky are you using? Because it certainly wasn't cutting or sharply critical. Snide is the only way it's justified given the first definition. I'd accept the cranky definition as well. It's the response of someone who was bested and all they could do was offer a very lame ass retort so they didn't have to admit they had nothing to begin with.
Did you take a break specifically to come back and do the exact same thing over and over again? Yet other people are the trolls, somehow.
QFT, faggot.
You literally asked "And which post of mine stated I make more money than everyone else?"
And you literally posted "I probably make more than all of you to be honest."
You should have done what you usually do and pretend no one called you out. You would look less dumb than you currently do.
And you could use all the less dumb moments you can get.
I'd actually say that looking at a small group of people who are making fun of your degree and letting them know that you probably make more than they do is pretty biting. I suppose you want to argue it was more hug-like? The extreme reaction it provoked would suggest I was right.
And I wasn't bested in any sense. The quote Tgo pulled up was me arguing that our household taxes were higher than most individuals make. By the way, you don't actually have to make that much as a household for that to be true. That's not the same thing as saying my individual income is higher or lower than anything else.
The quote also directly contradicts your accusations that I just "suddenly" decided income inequality is a problem, and none of this gives any credence to what's going on with my brother.
I do see why you like Trump. Your penchant for arguments built on gross distortions of the truth almost matches his.
No...spin is trying to pass off a comment about household taxes as a statement on individual earnings.
Or trying to pass off a snarky comment about 3-4 people as being about a whole forum.
Trying to argue that my interest in income inequality is new and pretending to psychicly know what's going on with my family is just lying.
Did he really call birth control abortion inducing drugs or is my news feed blowing this out of proportion
https://media.giphy.com/media/27EhcDHnlkw1O/giphy.gif
Ok, I'm calling it now. Time4fun is now the #1 contender to cwolff's belt and she deserves a match.
No Holds Barred.
No Disqualification.
Make this happen people.
Knowing you, you are probably blowing it out of proportion.
Like everything else.
You are the Chicken Little of the PC.
And you better watch the fuck out.. time4fun is coming after your All World Retard Belt and you better step your fucking game down.
Or you'll just be another Backlash wannabe.
Remember when cwolff freaked out about Russia having a floating nuclear powerplant? Because, you know, every submarine they have runs on fairy dust.
Theyre building nuclear power plants on barges
That's a terrible fucking idea.
It is a terrible idea.
Terrible idea because a nuclear plant offshore is somehow less safe than on land or terrible idea because nuclear power period is a terrible idea?
https://youtu.be/0bX8dcZqOPM
I think Harris looked like shit here unless she has some bombshells to drop about some convo he had which would knock him out of the running. It's weird to see Kavanaugh at about the :50 second mark and at the 1:57 mark he acts like he doesn't know anyone at the firm.
Some reporting out says he's been buddies with this guy for 9 years. https://www.kasowitz.com/people/edward-e-mcnally/
I'm a big fan of hers and I love how she's used her big brain and legal expertise in these hearings. With that being said, my impression is that she asked him a "gotcha" type of question she doesn't know the answer to. She should know the answer before pushing him on this. She also put words in his mouth, "are you certain you have not..." and he hadn't made a statement of denial and had to correct her.
I wonder if any of it even matters. They sure seem powerless to stop the appointment. IMO, she went for a kill shot and missed. That's worse than not going for it in the first place. We'll see what happens but we're probably fucked. Kavanaugh gets in and it'll be much easier from trump to challenge Mueller, his findings and any questions about an interview which he refuses to do since Kavanaugh's down with that.
Harris: Did you talk with anyone at Kasselwitz Benson & Torres?
Kavanaugh: You asked me that. I need to know who works there.
Harris: I think you can answer the question without me giving you a list of all employees at that law firm.
Kavanaugh: Well actually I can't.
Harris: Why not?
Kavanaugh: Because I don't know who works there.
Harris:
https://i.imgur.com/BRsH7B1.png
OH YEAH SHE DID FANTASTIC THERE'S NO WAY HE'LL BE CONFIRMED NOW I'LL BE SURPRISED IF TRUMP ISN'T IMPEACHED OVER THIS OMG OMG OMG OMG!!!!!!!!2
Nice 2020 candidate you idiots got there. :lol:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jlzc6tz4gwA
Kaboom.
GG
They'll be calling for her resignation or dismissal soon. I put money on that.
"Have you ever spoken to someone who works at Target?"
"Well I suppose it's possible, I don't know everyone who works at Target."
"AH HA! So you admit it! Target's colors are red! Russia is red! Russian collusion confirmed."
The entire senate stands and claps and votes to deny Kavanaugh and impeach Trump.
Interesting developments in the candidacy of Brett Kavanaugh. Can he survive? Will this be his #metoo?Quote:
"I have received information from an individual concerning the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. That individual strongly requested confidentiality, declined to come forward or press the matter further," Feinstein said.
"I have honored that decision. I have, however, referred the matter to federal investigative authorities," she continued.
Questions about the letter boiled over on Wednesday after The Intercept published a piece saying Feinstein had refused to share the content of the letter with other members on the committee.
Sources told The Intercept that the letter was relayed by an individual affiliated with Stanford University. Some sources told the publication that it was about an incident involving Kavanaugh and a woman while they were in high school.
Attorney Debra Katz is representing the woman who is the subject of the letter, according to The Intercept. She declined to confirm to BuzzFeed News that she is representing the woman, and did not comment further.
Digging back all the way to high school now. Incredible.
She referred it to the FBI. It could be taken either as A) she's keeping it secret and referring it to the FBI as a political stunt or B) it must be pretty serious if she's keeping it under wraps and referring to the FBI. I tend to think the secrecy gives it more credibility but it could be nothing and she's doing her best to milk it.
I'm 100% positive it is a political stunt. If it was a smoking gun, she'd be blabbing all over about it. First, if it is accusing him of rape or sexual assault, that isn't an FBI matter. It is a state matter. Second, Brett Kavanaugh is in his 50s. He was in High School nearly 40 years ago. The statute of limitations would be up by now, unless there is DNA evidence or it is straight up rape, which would be extremely hard to prove after this length of time. So literally, unless he murdered someone and this note says he did it and there is a body, he can't be charged with jack shit.
She is trying to delay the confirmation vote with this, that is all.
lmfao @ high school. Seriously what the fuck is wrong with you morons?
"Brett Kavanaugh tried to go to second base with me in 9th grade when we were making out under the bleachers! He's clearly a rapist and is unfit to be on the Supreme Court! REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!111"
And of course you have soywolff doing his best to force even himself to buy into it.
If even soywolff is questioning it even just a little bit and it's coming from the left, then you know it has to be retarded beyond what regular words can describe. Possibly even more retarded than soywolff himself.
cwolff probably believes the elevator story too
https://pics.me.me/huffpost-huffpost...g-34740646.png
How the fuck is this an "interesting development"? I was just reading this story and thinking "No one can be so dumb as to be swayed by this bullshit" and the first thing I see when I come to the PC is cwolff peddling this nonsense and saying how "interesting" this "development" is.
I have received information from an individual concerning cwolff remaining a member of the PC. That individual strongly requested confidentiality, declined to come forward or press the matter further. I have honored that decision. I have, however, referred the matter to federal investigate authorities.
Now please do the right thing and leave the forums, cwolff, since I have disclosed all of your dirty secrets for the world to see.
Wait, was he molested? Is that why they specify 'woman' and not classmate?
Maybe he tried to look down his hot science teacher's shirt on microscope day because she'd wear a loose tank top and would lean way over when looking into the microscope, resulting in high amounts of large and firm cleavage, probably close to the maximum allowed before it's considered actual exposed boob (not including underboob and sideboob), to be admired by a room full of students with uncontrollable boners.
No wait, that was my science class.
I'm out of ideas then. :shrug:
Now is not the time to reveal you've been home-schooled.
If Trump gets to go all the way back to Obama's birth to make shit up, you can give the Democrats high school! :lol:
What about barf certificates though?
http://www.chingforddogtraining.co.u...jpg?1501365863
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/d3/93...822ab63ff2.jpg
I wonder when Androidpk will come along and "hold both sides accountable" for what Feinstein did?
He whined like no tomorrow about Alex Jones but is strangely silent about a sitting senator doing something that would make even Jones do a double take.
It's like I'm psychic. Or Androidpk is just that predictable.
"Alex Jones needs to be shut down! How dare he be able to spin conspiracy theories from the comfort of his own show!!!!!1111!"
"Diane Feinstein, a sitting senator, spinning conspiracy theories about a supreme court justice nominee is perfectly fine and reasonable. I am bipartisan after all."
It's okay, Androidpk. The good news is you have fallen so low these past few months that no one's respect for you can possibly go any lower.
She supposedly referred a supposed crime to federal authorities based on the statements of a supposed anonymous person who stated they don't want to come forward or for any information regarding the supposed crime to be released.
My god you're a fucking moron. At least Alex Jones had the balls to put his name on any conspiracy theory he pushed and didn't hide behind an anonymous source to push his shit. But here you are defending a Democrat senator who is doing exactly that. It's almost like you have no scrupulous at all. Weird.
Yeah, defending someone for reporting a potential crime to the FBI is terrible!
Oh it's an "embarrassment" when someone mentions another person first? Well shit, your new buddy time4fun mentions me all of the time when I'm not around. So you're saying she's an embarrassment too? You gonna take this, time4fun? From the person you called a racist, sexist, bigoted homophobe?
I really should stop picking on you, time4fun, and cwolff. I feel like a heavyweight boxer getting into the ring with a 6 year who has bad eye sight and a limp.
No, I'm calling your behavior embarrassing.
Aren't you the little cupcake that doxed someone for hurting your feelings?
https://media1.tenor.com/images/906e...temid=10799529
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AriOjUfbBrw
Democrats are in a really bad place.
Quote:
“A woman has said he raped her in high school.”
“This list of 65 women from his high school say he’s great.”
“Wait, why did you have that list?”
“No reason."
LMAO. Didn't Kavanaugh go to an all boy's high school anyway?Quote:
Sarah Kendzior Retweeted Cam Banks
I don't even understand this logic as a line of defense. It's like "Jeffrey Dahmer's great -- here's a dozen people he *didn't* eat!"
https://twitter.com/boymonster/statu...27737227153409
He was at an all boys school, but nothing says the women, or the accuser, was from his high school.
If this is about a rape that happened 50 freaking years ago then why did Feinstein refer this to federal authorities? Wouldn't this be a state issue? Also wouldn't the statute of limitations passed a long, long time ago?
It's almost as if this was all just a political stunt by Feinstein.
Supposedly he and another guy tried to force themselves on the accuser at a party. It is a he said/she said thing well beyond on the statute of limitations and basically not provable either way.
That there are no reported cases of him ever trying this with other women is kinda telling to me.
Maryland doesn't have a statute of limitations for serious crimes, rape included.
Interesting side note. Gorsuch graduated from the same high school two years before Kavanaugh and Powell (Fed Chair) graduated from it in '71.
Quote:
While his friend watched, she said, Kavanaugh pinned her to a bed on her back and groped her over her clothes, grinding his body against hers and clumsily attempting to pull off her one-piece bathing suit and the clothing she wore over it. When she tried to scream, she said, he put his hand over her mouth.
“I thought he might inadvertently kill me,” said Ford, now a 51-year-old research psychologist in northern California. “He was trying to attack me and remove my clothing.”
Ford said she was able to escape when Kavanaugh’s friend and classmate at Georgetown Preparatory School, Mark Judge, jumped on top of them, sending all three tumbling. She said she ran from the room, briefly locked herself in a bathroom and then fled the house.
Ford said she told no one of the incident in any detail until 2012, when she was in couples therapy with her husband. The therapist’s notes, portions of which were provided by Ford and reviewed by The Washington Post, do not mention Kavanaugh’s name but say she reported that she was attacked by students “from an elitist boys’ school” who went on to become “highly respected and high-ranking members of society in Washington.” The notes say four boys were involved, a discrepancy Ford says was an error on the therapist’s part. Ford said there were four boys at the party but only two in the room.
This might get some people's attention.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/inves...17b_story.html
Wow. I honestly didn't really think this mystery letter would do much in the confirmation narrative. This story may very well change that.
This man is a monster. No wonder Trump likes him so much.
Unindicted co-conspirators should not be allowed to appoint judges.
Check out this link.https://www.instagram.com/p/BnwjBsVn...=1kzcul6oln7sk
It seems that the accuser has passed a polygraph about her accusations and Don Jr.'s making cute little jokes about her attempted rape experience. It's fitting I guess. The pussy grabbing sexual molester president picks a sexual assaulter to decide key reproductive rights for women.
So then no innocent person has ever failed a polygraph and no guilty one has ever passed it, that's what you are saying? So the courts should start admitting them into evidence, right as the end all be all of guilt vs. innocence we no longer need trials, just a polygraph? This event happened a long time ago to someone who had been drinking, memories get changed over that time, either better or worse. Kavanaugh has been on the bench and in high profile public service for a very long time, why is this just now surfacing?
As far as Don Jr., personally I think he and his dad are both pigs, but Trump is still better than the criminal Hillary Clinton. And my portfolio has done remarkably well under Trump, so as much as I might find the man distasteful personally, as a leader he is much better than the feckless asshat that came before or the criminal that you prefer.
I don't believe you find him distasteful personally. In fact, I think you like the guy. He validates your bullshit and doesn't ask you to #bebest. You throw around cute little phrases like "criminal Hillary Clinton" and call Obama feckless. You are choosing to believe conspiracy theory but not this woman. You feign at objectivity and indifference while you dismiss her allegations then wonder why she's not come forward before. You and trump are peas in a pod so don't try to fucking bullshit me into thinking you find him distasteful. He's your man through and through.
Imagine a country under the control of people like cwolff.
https://memestatic.fjcdn.com/picture...f2_6448313.jpg
"Good news, white people are dying off" "How do we deprogram 1/3 of the country?" "guilty until proven innocent" ~Cwolff
I believe her- accusers put themselves in terrible positions when they dare to speak up. Add to the fact that this man is a powerful person in government, and it's all the worse. She's brave for doing this- both reliving trauma and opening herself up to the horrible things people will say about- and to- her.
Having said that- polygraph tests are literally pseudo-science. They weren't invented to test if people were lying, the available evidence suggests they are a terrible way to make that determination, and increasingly courts refuse to accept them as valid evidence (thankfully). So the polygraph test doesn't personally influence my take on the situation.
Sorry- what has she been indicted for?
I hate to break it to you, but at this point there's a lot more out there suggesting Trump is a criminal than there is suggesting Clinton is a criminal. He's an unindicted co-conspirator in a felony Federal campaign finance case, he's being sued by the state of New York for breaking multiple laws with his foundation, and there are several serious investigations going on of him, his businesses, and his campaign- which- unlike Clinton- have actually led to indictments and guilty pleas/verdicts.
Now seems like a VERY strange time to be making the comparison you're making.
time4fun will really need to step up her game if she wants your belt.
She came in with a weak ass "the man is a monster!" and you used your ESP to look into a man you've never met or had any lengthy conversations with and came out with what he "really believes".
Unless time4fun can come up with some sort of new PhD or real life experience (Psst... maybe she was raped or fondled by a future judge.., giving her real gravitas..) I don't see her beating you.
The retard is just too damn strong with you.
Pretty much undecided, Feinstein holding out like this corrupts the legitimacy of the womans accusations.
I also don't find the woman to be brave at all. If the accusations being made are true, her cowardice put to risk other women.