No, it doesn't. But we should never pass up the opportunity to humiliate you, Dreaven, so let's go through each and every one of your totally nonsensical ravings to rob you of even the
illusion that you ever know what you're talking about.
1) There's a reason you placed "experts" in scare quotes -- which doesn't change anything or confer anything on those experts -- though it certainly foreshadows how emotional and divorced from reality your entire argument is going to be.
2) Those "experts"
are, in fact,
experts. The experts featured in the article were:
- Nature, of which there isn't a more widely respected, peer-reviewed medical and biological journal.
- NIH's director, Dr. Fauci, who is one of the most respected and widely cited immunologists in the world and has been the director of the NIH since before the majority of Gemstone players were born.
- The World Health Organization, which is composed of the most accomplished medical professionals from all over the globe.
- The Trump administration's Centers for Disease Control
- The Trump administration's Defense Intelligence Agency
3) The media, and Democrats, trust in science for reasons that
shouldn't have to be explained to you, but since conservatives in 2021 have lurched so far into crazyland, apparently require you to be reminded: the scientific method has produced more positive outcomes than any alternative, of which conservatives have proposed... None. What would those be, again? Who are the
"Real Experts" that know "
What's Really Going On" in Dreaven's retarded fantasyland?
Your wishes don't change history:
- Nature's article: Although the evidence shows that SARS-CoV-2 is not a purposefully manipulated virus, it is currently impossible to prove or disprove the other theories of its origin described here.
- WHO's cited claim: "It is probable, likely, that the virus is of animal origin."
- NIH's Dr. Fauci: "(the scientific evidence) is very, very strongly leaning toward this could not have been artificially or deliberately manipulated"
- Trump's CDC: "The sequences from U.S. patients are similar to the one that China initially posted, suggesting a likely single, recent emergence of this virus from an animal reservoir."
- Trump's DIA: "No credible evidence to indicate SARS-CoV-2 was released intentionally or was created as a biological weapon"
What's that? Dreaven was just forced to LIE OUT OF HIS ASS? His wishes DIDN'T change history to suit his hysterical delusions? The entire premise of his retarded thread is faulty? You don't say!
No, Dreaven. Your choice (and other conservatives' decisions) to engage in
identity politics to deflect Trump's incredible incompetence and mismanagement of the pandemic was called racist. Your feelings don't change history.
Except, as we can see above, they all acknowledged that was possible by speaking in terms of probabilities, couching their position with caveats, and directly contradicted your hysterical nonsense. Your pseudo-intellectual and tribal opposition to science doesn't change anything, except for how retarded you appear to be.
You demonstrated:
1) that you didn't understand what scientific authorities were saying about COVID
2) that you're motivated by feelings -- not evidence -- to assign blame to China, that you bought into out of identity politics
3) your lack of understanding that other people are driven by
evidence, of which there still isn't to back up the notion that "China's at fault," and that
if it's produced, people will appropriately change their mind.
That fact check was an evaluation of Yan's claims of certainty and evidence that COVID "was a man-made virus created in a lab," which she didn't provide
evidence for, and other more credible scientific authorities, including those in the Trump administration, weren't persuaded.
Scientists at Johns Hopkins said, of her claims: "contradictory and inaccurate information that does not support their argument.."
Source.
Scientists at MIT said, of her claims: "This manuscript does not demonstrate sufficient scientific evidence to support its claims."
Source.
That lady hasn't been vindicated, and neither have other conspiracy theorists. Scientists are driven by evidence, of which you currently have none. You are, as always, completely retarded.
