Printable View
https://www.newsweek.com/progressive...l-okay-1571510
Apparently Joe hates black and brown people. He thinks they belong in cages. That racist POS. Hopefully all of his pictures and name are removed from anything he's associated with.
How could he do this to the children!!! MONSTER!
Take notes. This is how you call out the leader of your own party when they do something unacceptable.
Most Republicans never figured out how to criticize Trump, so Shaps must be very confused that progressives are criticizing Biden.
You voted for a racist, so that makes you a racist. You hate black and brown children too.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Shame, shame, shame!
There's that classic confusion you're known for. Spectacular.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaps
It's more like looks like another broken campaign promise made by Biden/Harris.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
2020: "We will never lock children up in cages!"
2021: "Well, we have to because of Covid"
Thank god. Only a retard would put children in the same confinement as human smugglers.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
But he should still be impeached now because reasons, right?Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
It's not all that confusing. Most democrats didn't even want Biden, the DNC just forced him on everyone. They were just really that butthurt over Trump and now they're starting to already have voter's remorse.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
2022 should be interesting.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AshlianaThere's that classic confusion you're known for. Spectacular.Quote:
Originally Posted by ShapsYou voted for a racist, so that makes you a racist. You hate black and brown children too.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Shame, shame, shame!
He's simply playing by the "rules" that your party made up.
I know you're confused about voting, but the reason Biden won the nomination is because the most primary voters voted for Biden. It's the same reason why Trump lost the presidency: most general election voters voted for Biden.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
And which rules would those be?Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Without mentioning Trump, tell me more about how and why democrats are super excited to have Joe Biden as their president even though it was clear that most of them wanted Bernie?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
The same one that you quoted before you started whining...Quote:
And which rules would those be?
"You voted for a racist, so that makes you a racist. You hate black and brown children too."
Or do leftist standards not apply to leftists when it's inconvenient for them?
Your ignorance of the primary process, and the general election, reflects on you, Methais. Your ignorance -- willful or otherwise -- reflects on you. If more Democrats were "super excited" about Bernie, Bernie would've been the nominee. FYI, I voted for Bernie. I was outvoted. That's how politics works.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
You're assuming facts not in evidence, then basing your question around your false premise. Better luck next time.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
So you're not going to tell me more about how and why democrats are super excited to have Joe Biden as their president without mentioning Trump?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
What requires Democrats to be "super excited" about having Joe Biden as president? Since you were confused about why Biden beat Bernie in the primary, you don't seem to be able to transition to any attempt to make an actual point. Better luck next time.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
I'll make it easier for you then, and I'll even make the post about you specifically, which should make you feel better about yourself...Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Without mentioning Trump, tell us why you think Biden is a good president.
Ashliana: "BECAUSE HE HAS A "(D)"!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
https://media0.giphy.com/media/jzaZ23z45UxK8/giphy.gif
Biden's already a good president, since he's proven effective in undoing most of the worst shit that Trump did - mostly executive orders, since Trump didn't know how to get anything passed except tax cuts for the hyper-wealthy. Since you were confused about why Biden beat Bernie in the primary, you don't seem to be able to transition to any attempt to make an actual point. Better luck next time.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
"Methais couldn't make a coherent point. But I'll pretend his inability to do so was Ashliana's fault!"Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Very convincing.
So your explanation, without mentioning Trump, is "Because he isn't Trump!"Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
You're such a winner.
This is correct.Quote:
"I, Ashliana, couldn't make a coherent point. But I'll project my inability to do so and say it was Methais's fault!"
Very convincing.
So you were forced to drop whatever point you tried, and failed, to make about Biden vs. Bernie?Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
You're such a winner.
Very convincing argument.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
I bet you think the same about Hillary in 2016 when Bernie also got shafted, don't you? We'll just agree to agree that you're an idiot.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Moving on from the primaries...
So you were forced to drop whatever point you tried, and failed, to make about Biden being a good president without mentioning Trump?
Sorry that things have to be dumbed down for you. I blame myself for giving you the benefit of the doubt. I should know better by now.Quote:
Very convincing argument.
You not understanding how primaries work only reflects on you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
You mean your third desperate pivot once your previous attempt to make a "point" (which you still haven't managed) failed? I already answered your retarded question. Better luck next time!Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Sorry it has to be explained to you that when you're forced to drop your previous position and desperately pivot to a new one, you're conceding. I don't give you the benefit of the doubt, though, since you make the same errors in every thread. :) As I said, better luck next time!Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
You not understanding how the DNC railroaded Bernie in 2016 and 2020 only reflects on you. Just because you eat 100% of the shit that the DNC spoon feeds you without question doesn't make you correct. It just makes you stupid and gullible, which is the exact kind of voter that the DNC relies on.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
"Desperate" :lol:Quote:
You mean your third desperate pivot once your previous attempt to make a "point" (which you still haven't managed) failed? I already answered your retarded question. Better luck next time!
You're always so overly dramatic. Almost like you're trying really really hard to be a 13-year-old girl. Which is probably pretty accurate now that I think about it.
But anyway, no, you didn't answer anything, because so far you're still unable to explain what makes Biden a good president without mentioning Trump. Your entire argument so far has been, "Because he's not Trump!'
If that's what you wanna call dumbing things down for you so that even your retarded brain can hopefully understand it, sure.Quote:
Sorry it has to be explained to you that when you're forced to drop your previous position and desperately pivot to a new one, you're conceding.
The projection here is unreal. But yes, I still take full blame for giving you the benefit of the doubt when I should have known better, since you've spent years on here proving how retarded you are. I know things like that are a foreign concept to you and everything is always someone else's fault, so you'll just have to trust me.Quote:
I don't give you the benefit of the doubt, though, since you make the same errors in every thread. :) As I said, better luck next time!
But let's try this once more anyway just for fun:
Without mentioning Trump, tell us why Biden is a good president. Do you think you're capable of that?
This is your 4th desperate pivot to yet another non-sequitur. You not understanding how people are nominated reflects on you. Bernie didn't get the nomination because he got fewer votes. Period. And I say that as a Bernie supporter. Just because you're too retarded to know anything about a topic you're going out of your way to participate in doesn't magically confer "gullibility" on anyone else. Better luck with your flailing arguments next time.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Those quotation marks magically change the reality of your actions! Well done!Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Your unwillingness to read (or inability to comprehend) basic English reflects on you. Sorry, bud.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
If that's what you did, you might have a point. But, y'know, you didn't. You pivoted to new topics.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Your lack of self-awareness is unreal. Your inability to deal with the fact that you pivoted from argument to argument -- while having no point all the while -- reflects on you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Let's try this once more anyway just for fun: How does Biden being a good president or not, have anything to do with Bernie, the original point you pivoted away from? Do you think you're capable of answering that?Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
I'm shocked that you're a supporter of the guy who promises you free stuff at other people's expense. SHOCKED!!!!1Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Right, because that wasn't just me pointing out how overly dramatic all of your posts are or anything. In before you're like "It wasn't, it was instead <insert a bunch of retarded words>!" because that's your MO.Quote:
Those quotation marks magically change the reality of your actions! Well done!
Copying & pasting the same handful of lines in every post where anyone disagrees with you about anything magically changes the reality of your actions! Well done!Quote:
Your unwillingness to read (or inability to comprehend) basic English reflects on you. Sorry, bud.
Nah, you just are incapable of understanding things like:Quote:
If that's what you did, you might have a point. But, y'know, you didn't. You pivoted to new topics.
I didn't say one had anything to do with the other. The Bernie part was just an afterthought. But since you'll never figure it out on your own, I'll explain: Biden being a "good president" doesn't have anything to do with Bernie, because neither of them were president during the primaries. Which means Biden being a "good president" has nothing to do with any bullshit that happened during the primaries. Dumbass.Quote:
How does Biden being a good president or not, have anything to do with Bernie, the original point you pivoted away from? Do you think you're capable of answering that?
You seem to be confusing "being president" with "being a good president." Or you're just rearranging words to try and fit your narrative. Big shocker there either way.
In (again) before you're like "It wasn't an afterthought, it was instead <insert a bunch of retarded words> and something something you conceded simply because I said it was so!" because you're just a predictable tard like that.
Let's see here...so far the points I've made are:
- Bernie got fucked over in the 2016 and 2020 primaries. This is an opinion that can't be proven true or false either way. That also includes your side of it, despite you being convinced that you're always right no matter what. You can't understand this concept, because your argument is "But Biden won so that proves you wrong!" Regardless, it was originally just an afterthought, which you keep desperately clinging onto so that you can continue to deflect from the fact that...
- You can't explain why Biden is a "good president" (which isn't the same thing as "being president") without mentioning Trump. This is, at least so far, a fact.
- You fill your posts with overly dramatic words under the illusion that it strengthens your retarded points. Except it doesn't, and you're still a huge tard. These are both facts.
- You will reply to this in an overly dramatic fashion again while deciding that what i meant isn't really what I meant, and that instead what I really meant was <insert a bunch of Ashliana retardedness. This is also a fact.
Kind of like your support for Trump and his trillion-dollar give-away to the super wealthy? Ah. There's that classic Methais self-awareness again.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
It was you throwing a tantrum about the fact that you keep pivoting, and your inability to deal with that being pointed out. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
It's almost like there's a consistent theme among right-wingers and their inability to deal with unwelcome facts. Who knew?Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Nothing you've said has had anything to do with anything you previously said. Thanks for admitting it was an "afterthought," but you're arguing for its own sake, and don't have a coherent position to defend which, as always, reflects on you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
No, he didn't. He got fewer votes, which has nothing to do with whatever opinion the DNC held of him in 2016. He did pretty well, but not well enough. Your attempts to insinuate positions you don't have the balls to actually take -- because they'd get dismantled instantly -- and your ensuing butthurt about them -- is your problem.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Your unwillingness (or inability) to read reflects on you. Sorry.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Your unilateral declarations continue to lack the power to twist and warp reality to suit your delusions, much to your obvious dismay. Better luck laying out a coherent position next time.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
I supported not having Hillary as president more than anything else. And a better economy, which we had under Trump.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
You're still throwing a tantrum because you keep trying to deflect but keep failing. Much like how you failed your parents.Quote:
It was you throwing a tantrum about the fact that you keep pivoting, and your inability to deal with that being pointed out. :)
It pretty much sums up your entire existence.Quote:
It's almost like there's a consistent theme among left-wingers and their inability to deal with unwelcome facts. Who knew?
You're welcome. Next time I'll make it a point to to remind myself that you're as stupid as you are, and I'll just get right to the crayons for you.Quote:
Nothing you've said has had anything to do with anything you previously said. Thanks for admitting it was an "afterthought," but you're arguing for its own sake, and don't have a coherent position to defend which, as always, reflects on you.
So you don't understand what "got fucked over" means.Quote:
No, he didn't. He got fewer votes, which has nothing to do with whatever opinion the DNC held of him in 2016. He did pretty well, but not well enough. Your attempts to insinuate positions you don't have the balls to actually take -- because they'd get dismantled instantly -- and your ensuing butthurt about them -- is your problem.
There you go deflecting again.Quote:
Your unwillingness (or inability) to read reflects on you. Sorry.
Thanks for being every bit as predictable as I said.Quote:
Your unilateral declarations continue to lack the power to twist and warp reality to suit your delusions, much to your obvious dismay. Better luck laying out a coherent position next time.
Ok let's get to a new topic now...
Can you explain to me, without mentioning Trump, why Biden isn't a bad president? And...go!
Ah, so now you do understand the millions of people who voted against Trump rather than "for" Biden? Great.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
What's being deflected? Your now sixth formulation of a point-free "argument"? Right.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
The brand-defining Methais lack of self-awareness rears its head again. Kudos.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Next time perhaps you should try sticking to a single "position" instead of veering off and desperately pivoting to one after another as they fall apart.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Neither do you, since you haven't been able to establish how anything the DNC did resulted in Bernie getting fewer votes.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Pointing out your inability to read isn't "deflecting." Try again.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
When you make the same retarded, evidence-free assertion, the same response gets pointed out: Your words are incapable of changing reality. No matter how butthurt you get about that, that remains reality, which you can't stand.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
You didn't read the first or second time, so you can peruse the thread for answers at your own convenience. Good luck.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
You can't explain why Biden is a "good president" without mentioning Trump, so you hyperfocus on everything else. And it makes you super mad that it doesn't work.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
Correct.Quote:
The brand-defining Ashlianalack of self-awareness rears its head again. Kudos.
Yes you're right, I shouldn't have expected you to be able to be able to handle more than one thing at a time.Quote:
Next time perhaps you should try sticking to a single "position" instead of veering off and desperately pivoting to one after another as they fall apart.
Gosh, it's almost like you intentionally excluded the part where I said that my view of the primaries it was an opinion that can't be proven true or false, just like your stance on it, in some disingenuous attempt to strengthen your "argument." It's ok though, I already knew you were going to do that before I made the post. Thanks for being predictable again.Quote:
Neither do you, since you haven't been able to establish how anything the DNC did resulted in Bernie getting fewer votes.
This is correct.Quote:
Me pretending to point out your inability to read isn't "deflecting." But me continually trying to hyperfocus on everything but that is though.
Yup.Quote:
When I make the same retarded, evidence-free assertion, the same response gets pointed out: My words are incapable of changing reality. No matter how butthurt I get about that, that remains reality, which I can't stand.
Good luck buddy! Stop by the positivity thread and let go of all that anger.Quote:
You didn't let me shape the narrative the way I wanted to, and now I'm mad.
Your unwillingness (or inability) to read only reflects on you. Better luck next time.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Looks like it's fantasy again for Methais.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
It's not about handling more than one thing at a time, it's that you keep pivoting from topic to topic as each one of your retarded positions instantly disintegrates. There's no thread.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
What an interesting non-sequitur that in no way addresses what I said: your inability to lay out any kind of coherent position. The burden of proof lies on the one making the claim, and you haven't been able to substantiate any of your "claims." Thanks for being predictable again.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Methais style fantasy again, just like your reference in the other thread to nonexistent events in 2016. Sorry. Your assertions aren't capable of rewriting history, much to your obvious dismay.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
See above. Your assertions aren't capable of rewriting history, much to your obvious dismay.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Best of luck scrounging up a coherent position next time!Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
https://media1.tenor.com/images/f606...itemid=7445527Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana