Biden Impeachment!

https://newschannel9.com/news/local/...resident-biden

Wow! Biden already impeached. That corrupt politician somehow achieved the highest appointment in the land. How can this be?

He must be HORRIBLE and EVIL - otherwise he wouldn't be IMPEACHED!

Get the corrupt out! I'm with you guys. You all were right. We need to impeach the corrupt people in positions of power. Thank you, thank you, thank you for setting the example and supporting the continued assurance that corrupt politicians will be IMPEACHED as they should be.

EDIT: Assign a Special Counsel right now!

Well, I mean, of course it's going to go nowhere, but be careful what you wish for: If Biden was, in fact, successfully impeached, and convicted and removed from office, we'd have President Harris. Not that we're not going to have her anyways in ~one year, but let's put that off as far as possible.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by caelric

Well, I mean, of course it's going to go nowhere, but be careful what you wish for: If Biden was, in fact, successfully impeached, and convicted and removed from office, we'd have President Harris. Not that we're not going to have her anyways in ~one year, but let's put that off as far as possible.

---

As others have said on here for years.. he must be impeached, because he is evil and corrupt - otherwise he wouldn't have been impeached.

We need a Special Counsel appointed, his phones tapped, all of his associates questioned, and their homes raided. When someone is impeached, that is the standard!

Thankfully they have shown us what is good, righteous, and holy. As they have shown, if you are a dedicated patriot to this land, it is only proper to support a full and invasive (edit: comprehensive!) investigation into all of Joe Biden's business dealings.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Shaps

As others have said on here for years.. he must be impeached, because he is evil and corrupt - otherwise he wouldn't have been impeached.

We need a Special Counsel appointed, his phones tapped, all of his associates questioned, and their homes raided. When someone is impeached, that is the standard!

Thankfully they have shown us what is good, righteous, and holy. As they have shown, if you are a dedicated patriot to this land, it is only proper to support a full and invasive (edit: comprehensive!) investigation into all of Joe Biden's business dealings.

---

You sound absolutely fucking nuts. You are doing it on purpose for comedic effect, right?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Back

You sound absolutely fucking nuts. You are doing it on purpose for comedic effect, right?

---

You actually are a hypocritical piece of shit, that decides now to act "normal" all of a sudden? This is what YOU, and others, have told us. Just get the fuck outa here with your bullshit. Just like your sudden turn on ANTIFA. I seriously wish conflict resolution was circa 1850 still sometimes.

Edit: And because you're slow or ignorant, or more likely delusional... If you haven't figured out I'm trolling and regurgitating the same bullshit you all have for four years... then you're even more stupid than I originally thought.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Shaps

https://newschannel9.com/news/local/...resident-biden

Wow! Biden already impeached. That corrupt politician somehow achieved the highest appointment in the land. How can this be?

He must be HORRIBLE and EVIL - otherwise he wouldn't be IMPEACHED!

Get the corrupt out! I'm with you guys. You all were right. We need to impeach the corrupt people in positions of power. Thank you, thank you, thank you for setting the example and supporting the continued assurance that corrupt politicians will be IMPEACHED as they should be.

EDIT: Assign a Special Counsel right now!

---

A president is only "impeached" when the House votes on it, which has only successfully happened to three presidents in all of history: Johnson, Clinton and Trump (twice).

A retarded, first-term house member who supported QAnon, Pizzagate and calling mass shooting events "false flags" introducing articles of impeachment means nothing. Articles of impeachment have been introduced to every president in your lifetime, assuming you're not as old as Parkbandit. How stupid can you be? Are you even an American? Or is this just how piss poor a civic education modern-day Republicans have?

:clap:

Will get back to you if he gets impeached.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

A president is only "impeached" when the House votes on it, which has only successfully happened to three presidents in all of history: Johnson, Clinton and Trump (twice).

A retarded, first-term house member who supported QAnon, Pizzagate and calling mass shooting events "false flags" introducing articles of impeachment means nothing. How stupid can you be? Are you even an American? Or is this just how piss poor a civic education modern-day Republicans have?

:clap:

---

No, no, no.. Biden has been IMPEACHED. Get on board with the same zeal when the "corrupt" Trump was. Support the Special Counsel just as you did then.

Oh wait, you are truly a reprehensible hypocrite that would never maintain any sense of morality or consistency. Utter garbage.

Seems you're dumb as shit to not realize I'm trolling your idiotic logic either. Back and you, LOL..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Shaps

No, no, no.. Biden has been IMPEACHED. Get on board with the same zeal when the "corrupt" Trump was. Support the Special Counsel just as you did then.

Oh wait, you are truly a reprehensible hypocrite that would never maintain any sense of morality or consistency. Utter garbage.

Seems you're dumb as shit to not realize I'm trolling your idiotic logic either. Back and you, LOL..

---

Biden hasn’t been impeached though... if the vote passes in the house, then he becomes impeached, until then it means nothing really.
But I know you know this, and you’re just trolling and giving people shit.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Shaps

No, no, no.. Biden has been IMPEACHED. Get on board with the same zeal when the "corrupt" Trump was. Support the Special Counsel just as you did then.

Oh wait, you are truly a reprehensible hypocrite that would never maintain any sense of morality or consistency. Utter garbage.

Seems you're dumb as shit to not realize I'm trolling your idiotic logic either. Back and you, LOL..

---

No, he hasn't been. Again: a president is only said to have "been impeached" when articles of impeachment have been approved by a House vote. Take a civics class, shit-for-brains.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Solkern

Biden hasn’t been impeached though... if the vote passes in the house, than he becomes impeached, until then it means nothing really.

---

LOL.. so you support a Special Counsel too! Excellent! Let's get the investigation started.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

No, he hasn't been. Again: a president is only said to have "been impeached" when articles of impeachment have been approved by a House vote. Take a civics class, shit-for-brains.

---

ROFL. God you're are inept and ignorant. To.. much.. fun.

Get it yet? Hey, you get it yet? LOL.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Shaps

LOL.. so you support a Special Counsel too! Excellent! Let's get the investigation started.

---

Do you... also not know that articles of impeachment even being approved doesn't... result in a Special Counsel? Upon forwarding the approved articles of impeachment to the Senate, it initiates a Senate trial for conviction. It has nothing to do with the appointment of a Special Counsel... which is done by an Attorney General in a 100% separate effort that has nothing to do with impeachment unless a Special Counsel investigation yields evidence that is used in a separate impeachment.

Everyone knew Trump supporters were batshit retarded, but holy fuck, you're ignorant.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

Do you... also not know that articles of impeachment even being approved doesn't... result in a Special Counsel? Upon forwarding the approved articles of impeachment to the Senate, it initiates a Senate trial for conviction. It has nothing to do with the appointment of a Special Counsel... which is done by an Attorney General in a 100% separate effort that has nothing to do with impeachment unless a Special Counsel investigation yields evidence that is used in a separate impeachment.

Everyone knew Trump supporters were batshit retarded, but holy fuck, you're ignorant.

---

You still don't get it do you... LOL. That's fine, keep trying to appear "normal".

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Shaps

You still don't get it do you... LOL. That's fine, keep trying to appear "normal".

---

The only thing that's going to come out of this exchange where you're 100% demonstrably incorrect is you inevitably asserting something along these lines:

https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/...38/025/db0.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Shaps

You still don't get it do you... LOL. That's fine, keep trying to appear "normal".

---

Edit: I'll give you a hint - I'm saying the type of insane bullshit you've been spouting for years. It's just fun to watch you try and make excuses now. It's my entertainment.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Shaps

Edit: I'll give you a hint - I'm saying the type of insane bullshit you've been spouting for years. It's just fun to watch you try and make excuses now. It's my entertainment.

---

You're not, though. Trump was impeached twice, Biden hasn't been. You not being able to tell events apart, uhh.. doesn't reflect on Democrats, buddy. It reflects on you. Perhaps you should be more selective with how you try to mock liberals instead of making a fool of yourself repeatedly?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

You're not, though. Trump was impeached twice, Biden hasn't been. You not being able to tell events apart, uhh.. doesn't reflect on Democrats, buddy. It reflects on you. Perhaps you should be more selective with how you try to mock liberals instead of making a fool of yourself repeatedly?

---

LOL. You are trying so hard now. It's cute. I can't even imagine people that have to have discussions with you on a day to day basis. My sympathies go out to them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Shaps

LOL. You are trying so hard now. It's cute. I can't even imagine people that have to have discussions with you on a day to day basis. My sympathies go out to them.

---

Most of your fellow board Trump apologists aren't quite as bad at arguing as you are. I mean, they're not much better, but you don't even know what you're arguing. At least they're shitting out whatever the GOP's nonsensical position is on any given day. But you? Uhh... again, perhaps you should be a little more selective in achieving whatever it is you think you're doing on here.

Do you faggots ever get tired of being bitchy about Politics or nah?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Astray

Do you faggots ever get tired of being bitchy about Politics or nah?

---

Nope. This is my stress relief.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

Most of your fellow board Trump apologists aren't quite as bad at arguing as you are. I mean, they're not much better, but you don't even know what you're arguing. At least they're shitting out whatever the GOP's nonsensical position is on any given day. But you? Uhh... again, perhaps you should be a little more selective in achieving whatever it is you think you're doing on here.

---

I'm making fun of hypocrites. Said that multiple times. You're entertainment for me. I know that's hard for you to understand.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Astray

Do you faggots ever get tired of being bitchy about Politics or nah?

---

https://media0.giphy.com/media/l4Jzc...pMc/source.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by drauz

https://media0.giphy.com/media/l4Jzc...pMc/source.gif

---

Why wouldn't you stare straight into their eyes? Are you homophobic or? Goodness Drauz, in this day and age??

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Shaps

Why wouldn't you stare straight into their eyes? Are you homophobic or? Goodness Drauz, in this day and age??

---

I don't like the color.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by drauz

I don't like the color.

---

;)

Hey Ash.. Drauz gets it.. you still don't though.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Shaps

Nope. This is my stress relief.

---

:rofl: Stress relief? You have THIRTEEN screeching, poorly conceived threads on the main page of the Politics folder, because you're hopping mad that Trump's incompetence -- or rather, the GOP's unflinching support of the orange Sacred Cow -- led to the loss of the popular vote a second time by an even larger margin, lost the Senate, already lost the House, causing the GOP to be completely locked out of the levers of power for the first time in 13 years.

Who on Earth do you think you're fooling, dipshit? Sorry you're butthurt about losing, but your temper tantrums on the political forum of a text based video game from the 80's changes absolutely nothing. If you're so outraged, perhaps you should get involved in politics and spend your time volunteering. At least then you'd actually know how impeachment works instead of humiliating yourself in front of strangers again and again.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Shaps

I'm making fun of hypocrites. Said that multiple times. You're entertainment for me. I know that's hard for you to understand.

---

You're only "making fun of hypocrites" if you can actually establish the hypocrisy in question, which you didn't. That's why I recommended you be more selective. I know it's hard for you to understand, since you don't even know how impeachment works despite humiliating yourself in a public thread about it.....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

You're only "making fun of hypocrites" if you can actually establish the hypocrisy in question, which you didn't. That's why I recommended you be more selective. I know it's hard for you to understand, since you don't even know how impeachment works despite humiliating yourself in a public thread about it.....

---

God you're so dense. This shit is hilarious. Thank you sooo much. I needed this tonight.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Shaps

God you're so dense. This shit is hilarious. Thank you sooo much. I needed this tonight.

---

Hint: When you're forced to pull out the "I'm only pretending to be retarded for comedic effect" excuse in thread after thread, people can see for themselves what you're doing. So I'll repeat: Who on Earth do you think you're fooling?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

Hint: When you're forced to pull out the "I'm only pretending to be retarded for comedic effect" excuse in thread after thread, people can see for themselves what you're doing. So I'll repeat: Who on Earth do you think you're fooling?

---

Apparently you. As I said, this is going to be a fun four years. Hope you don't get tired.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Shaps

Apparently you. As I said, this is going to be a fun four years. Hope you don't get tired.

---

Isn't it funny how you didn't respond to the post explaining what you're actually doing -- which isn't "entertaining yourself"? Since you missed it:

Stress relief? You have THIRTEEN screeching, poorly conceived threads on the main page of the Politics folder, because you're hopping mad that Trump's incompetence -- or rather, the GOP's unflinching support of the orange Sacred Cow -- led to the loss of the popular vote a second time by an even larger margin, lost the Senate, already lost the House, causing the GOP to be completely locked out of the levers of power for the first time in 13 years.

Who on Earth do you think you're fooling, dipshit? Sorry you're butthurt about losing, but your temper tantrums on the political forum of a text based video game from the 80's changes absolutely nothing. If you're so outraged, perhaps you should get involved in politics and spend your time volunteering. At least then you'd actually know how impeachment works instead of humiliating yourself in front of strangers again and again.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

Isn't it funny how you didn't respond to the post explaining what you're actually doing -- which isn't "entertaining yourself"? Since you missed it:

Stress relief? You have THIRTEEN screeching, poorly conceived threads on the main page of the Politics folder, because you're hopping mad that Trump's incompetence -- or rather, the GOP's unflinching support of the orange Sacred Cow -- led to the loss of the popular vote a second time by an even larger margin, lost the Senate, already lost the House, causing the GOP to be completely locked out of the levers of power for the first time in 13 years.

Who on Earth do you think you're fooling, dipshit? Sorry you're butthurt about losing, but your temper tantrums on the political forum of a text based video game from the 80's changes absolutely nothing. If you're so outraged, perhaps you should get involved in politics and spend your time volunteering. At least then you'd actually know how impeachment works instead of humiliating yourself in front of strangers again and again.

---

LOL.. you're trying so hard tonight. You must be having a drink or something. This is pure fun. Keep going please. LOL.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Shaps

LOL.. you're trying so hard tonight. You must be having a drink or something. This is pure fun. Keep going please. LOL.

---

Yep. Looks like I hit the nail right on the head.

I feel like Shaps is also Rhaivan AKA Bochast Security Agency. Dude is off his fucking rocker, it's pretty obvious.

I think you need to make some mstrike videos next, pelase.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

Hint: When you're forced to pull out the "I'm only pretending to be retarded for comedic effect" excuse in thread after thread, people can see for themselves what you're doing.

---

I mean, that's exactly you on almost everything you post.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by caelric

I mean, that's exactly you on almost everything you post.

---

Ah, another low-effort swipe from the resident low-effort swipe troll. I'm sure you somehow thought that was very hurtful, but -- hint, hint -- there's a reason why you stick to sniping rather than trying to prove someone wrong in a substantive argument. You'd just be another Shaps.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

Ah, another low-effort swipe from the resident low-effort swipe troll. I'm sure you somehow thought that was very hurtful, but -- hint, hint -- there's a reason why you stick to sniping rather than trying to prove someone wrong in a substantive argument. You'd just be another Shaps.

---

Sure, ashy-poo, that's what it is. Except, you're wrong 99.999% of the time, so it's not worthwhile to put effort into it.

Waiting for you to come back with something about how I conceded, or something like that. Meanwhile, you're the one with serious mental issues, as evidenced by your obsessiveness on immediately replying to anyone who doesn't agree with you. Among other evidence of your batshit insanity, that is. You're getting to time4fun levels of batshit crazy.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by caelric

Sure, ashy-poo, that's what it is. Except, you're wrong 99.999% of the time, so it's not worthwhile to put effort into it.

---

Pointing out Shaps' inevitable defense of his behavior: "It doesn't matter, because I'm just entertaining myself" isn't anything at all like what you tried to snipe me with, so like I said - I'm sure you thought that was hurtful, but alas, all it did was reveal your poor reading comprehension.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by caelric

Waiting for you to come back with something about how I conceded, or something like that. Meanwhile, you're the one with serious mental issues, as evidenced by your obsessiveness on immediately replying to anyone who doesn't agree with you. Among other evidence of your batshit insanity, that is. You're getting to time4fun levels of batshit crazy.

---

It must be a foreign concept, but some people know how to set pop-up notifications when someone replies in a tagged thread. Do I have to respond to you idiots? Nope, sure don't. I could just leave the folder to be a hee-hawing, nearly-dead right-wing circlejerk, as I mostly have for the past four years. But the election prompted me to check in, and as long as it remains fun dismantling the dreck the right-wing clique on here calls their "arguments," I'll be around. So by all means, keep giving me the opportunity.

Incidentally..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by caelric

Except, you're wrong 99.999% of the time

---

Best of luck actually demonstrating my being wrong -- even once -- in an exchange, rather than just unilaterally declaring it, as if your delusions magically have the power to twist and warp reality to suit them. Which, y'know... they don't.

Like I said, t4f levels of batshit insane. I be you're proud of that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by caelric

Like I said, t4f levels of batshit insane. I be you're proud of that.

---

Swing and a miss.

Ah, yes, we're celebrating spite now. Surely the Republicans have something better to offer America?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by caelric

Like I said, t4f levels of batshit insane. I be you're proud of that.

---

Polly, want a cracker?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ewayn

Ah, yes, we're celebrating spite now. Surely the Republicans have something better to offer America?

---

Yes.

But let's focus on one Representative and start a thread over the matter. Whoops too late.

I'm sure if I put in a few minutes effort I could start a thread over a crazy bill some nutty Democratic Representative wants to introduce that the Democratic party doesn't support, but what would be the point?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ewayn

Ah, yes, we're celebrating spite now. Surely the Republicans have something better to offer America?

---

Like Republicans didn't warn Democrats that using Impeachment like a loose cannon would result in.....impeachment being used like a loose cannon.

But let's be honest, the only person that should be impeached is Hillary Clinton, for wearing whatever the fuck that nasty purple thing she was wearing on inauguration day.

https://hips.hearstapps.com/hmg-prod...1611158662.jpg

I mean come on! 1970's called, they want their leisure suit back. She's so fucking tacky.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Candor

Yes.

But let's focus on one Representative and start a thread over the matter. Whoops too late.

I'm sure if I put in a few minutes effort I could start a thread over a crazy bill some nutty Democratic Representative wants to introduce that the Democratic party doesn't support, but what would be the point?

---

But the whole point of half the people in this thread is to celebrate the spite without acknowledging that it’s from a nut job wackadoo. My point isn’t that the Republicans have nothing to offer, but simply that spite seems to resonate quite profoundly with a lot of the people here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/i...LjyHA&usqp=CAU

https://s2.r29static.com/bin/entry/7...520/image.webp

This shit writes itself.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ewayn

But the whole point of half the people in this thread is to celebrate the spite without acknowledging that it’s from a nut job wackadoo. My point isn’t that the Republicans have nothing to offer, but simply that spite seems to resonate quite profoundly with a lot of the people here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

---

I don't know, I think I could find more justification for impeaching Biden than I could have for 3 years of the Trump bullshit impeachment.

I'm just say'n.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Shaps

You actually are a hypocritical piece of shit, that decides now to act "normal" all of a sudden? This is what YOU, and others, have told us. Just get the fuck outa here with your bullshit. Just like your sudden turn on ANTIFA. I seriously wish conflict resolution was circa 1850 still sometimes.

Edit: And because you're slow or ignorant, or more likely delusional... If you haven't figured out I'm trolling and regurgitating the same bullshit you all have for four years... then you're even more stupid than I originally thought.

---

You're not trolling. You actually are crazy and believe most of what you say.

You just fall back on the "Oh I'm just joking" when you get called out on it

It's really quite sad.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neveragain

I don't know, I think I could find more justification for impeaching Biden than I could have for 3 years of the Trump bullshit impeachment.

I'm just say'n.

---

This is probably the most hilariously delusional post I've seen in a long time. And that's saying something

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by time4fun

This is probably the most hilariously delusional post I've seen in a long time. And that's saying something

---

https://ralphiesportal.files.wordpre...07_n.jpg?w=640

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neveragain

https://ralphiesportal.files.wordpre...07_n.jpg?w=640

---

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Neveragain again.

That's damn funny.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neveragain

I don't know, I think I could find more justification for impeaching Biden than I could have for 3 years of the Trump bullshit impeachment.

I'm just say'n.

---

I didn't want Biden as President and I am very concerned regarding the impact of some of the executive orders he has already signed.

But you do understand what impeachment is, right? What the requirements are? Exactly what high crimes has Biden committed since taking office a few days ago?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Candor

I didn't want Biden as President and I am very concerned regarding the impact of some of the executive orders he has already signed.

But you do understand what impeachment is, right? What the requirements are? Exactly what high crimes has Biden committed since taking office a few days ago?

---

What, you want some genuine crimes and so on, what the fuck, it hasn't been needed in recent times so why now?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~

What, you want some genuine crimes and so on, what the fuck, it hasn't been needed in recent times so why now?

---

But it totally has though.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Candor

I didn't want Biden as President and I am very concerned regarding the impact of some of the executive orders he has already signed.

But you do understand what impeachment is, right? What the requirements are? Exactly what high crimes has Biden committed since taking office a few days ago?

---

Conspiring and influence peddling... oh and aiding and abetting hiding his sons human trafficked whore house activity. Now I don't know if it's true, but allegations have been made - so a FULL investigation must be completed. To ensure our Democracy. The way has been shown how these things should be handled over the last four years.. so I say get to tearing through all of Biden's things.

We must be able to ensure that all allegations are thoroughly investigated.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Candor

I didn't want Biden as President and I am very concerned regarding the impact of some of the executive orders he has already signed.

But you do understand what impeachment is, right? What the requirements are? Exactly what high crimes has Biden committed since taking office a few days ago?

---

I think his crime bill, that he bragged about for years, that destroyed countless lives, is plenty enough grounds for impeachment. Like I said though, given 3 years, I have no doubt we could find reasons to impeach Biden.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neveragain

I think his crime bill, that he bragged about for years, that destroyed countless lives, is plenty enough grounds for impeachment. Like I said though, given 3 years, I have no doubt we could find reasons to impeach Biden.

---

Maybe you need to work on your reading comprehension, what high crimes has Biden done since taking office a few days ago? Your response is impeach him for something he did before he even became president? Like 20 years ago...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bhaalizmo

But it totally has though.

---

WOOOSHH!!

The shit posting has really gone downhill.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Candor

I didn't want Biden as President and I am very concerned regarding the impact of some of the executive orders he has already signed.

But you do understand what impeachment is, right? What the requirements are? Exactly what high crimes has Biden committed since taking office a few days ago?

---

Impeachment has a much lower threshold now. You don't need "high crimes" or "misdemeanors", you just have to say that he hurt your feelings.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Solkern

Maybe you need to work on your reading comprehension, what high crimes has Biden done since taking office a few days ago? Your response is impeach him for something he did before he even became president? Like 20 years ago...

---

To be honest, it doesn't have to be specifically something the President did during his term to get impeached.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

To be honest, it doesn't have to be specifically something the President did during his term to get impeached.

---

Wouldn't it be funny tho if you could impeach a president that's been sitting less than a week for a very public crime bill that he wrote and was passed by Congress decades prior to ever being elected that most everyone who voted for and against him knew about? That would be super funny.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

To be honest, it doesn't have to be specifically something the President did during his term to get impeached.

---

The impeachment process is already an uphill battle. If the crime occurred before the President's term of office, the hill IMHO gets even steeper.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by diethx

Wouldn't it be funny tho if you could impeach a president that's been sitting less than a week for a very public crime bill that he wrote and was passed by Congress decades prior to ever being elected that most everyone who voted for and against him knew about? That would be super funny.

---

If only he was a Republican...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Candor

The impeachment process is already an uphill battle. If the crime occurred before the President's term of office, the hill IMHO gets even steeper.

---

Impeachment used to be a tool Congress could use to remove a President that had committed "High crimes and misdemeanors".. now it is a political tool the opposition party will use to neutralize the President they did not want in office.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

Impeachment used to be a tool Congress could use to remove a President that had committed "High crimes and misdemeanors".. now it is a political tool the opposition party will use to neutralize the President they did not want in office.

---

It's only been used that way by Republicans. But you couldn't have had much of a problem with that, since you've continued to support them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

It's only been used that way by Republicans. But you couldn't have had much of a problem with that, since you've continued to support them.

---

Sexual harassment isn't a high crime anymore?

Good to know.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

Sexual harassment isn't a high crime anymore?

Good to know.

---

That isn't what he was impeached for. Romnesia at work?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

That isn't what he was impeached for. Romnesia at work?

---

Yeah, he was impeached for lying to a Grand Jury which is a felony, thus a "high crime".

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~

Yeah, he was impeached for lying to a Grand Jury which is a felony, thus a "high crime".

---

Look at you, unlike Parkbandit, able to look up a simple fact. Too bad it's a non-sequitur, since the neverending joke of an investigation that led to that impeachment was transparently politically motivated. The incident he was accused of lying about hadn't even occurred when that investigation began. Thus connecting back to the origin of this discussion point: impeachment being used "as a political tool the opposition party will use to neutralize the President they did not want in office." Whatever Clinton's issues were, they don't even begin to compare to the numerous crimes Trump committed, hundreds of times worse in severity than lying about having received a blow job, and whether that constituted "sex."

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

That isn't what he was impeached for. Romnesia at work?

---

He committed the textbook case of sexual harassment. Instead, he was impeached for lying under oath to a federal grand jury.

He literally was guilty of both.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

Look at you, unlike Parkbandit, able to look up a simple fact. Too bad it's a non-sequitur, since the neverending joke of an investigation that led to that impeachment was transparently politically motivated. The incident he was accused of lying about hadn't even occurred when that investigation began. Thus connecting back to the origin of this discussion point: impeachment being used "as a political tool the opposition party will use to neutralize the President they did not want in office." Whatever Clinton's issues were, they don't even begin to compare to the numerous crimes Trump committed, hundreds of times worse in severity than lying about having received a blow job, and whether that constituted "sex."

---

He committed text book case of sexual harassment and if he were a Republican, he would have been easily convicted because it was black and white.

It wasn't that he hurt someone's feelings.

But hey, don't let facts get in your way of being wrong as usual.

And no, I won't be responding to you because it's clear I put you in your place and you conceded.

Don't bother trying to take it back because I called "No backsies" earlier.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

He committed text book case of sexual harassment and if he were a Republican, he would have been easily convicted because it was black and white.

It wasn't that he hurt someone's feelings.

But hey, don't let facts get in your way of being wrong as usual.

And no, I won't be responding to you because it's clear I put you in your place and you conceded.

Don't bother trying to take it back because I called "No backsies" earlier.

---

You're getting the Paula Jones case and the Lewinsky case mixed up. Clinton was impeached for lying about the Lewinsky case, which was consensual, and not sexual harassment. The vote on the Jones case wasn't successfully passed, and Clinton wasn't impeached on that charge. You are an idiot, and your ignorance of major events that occurred when you were a middle-aged adult reflects on you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

Clinton was impeached for lying about the Lewinsky case, which was consensual,

---

It was about as consensual as a 4 star general and a private having an affair, or teacher and a student, or police officer asking for sex from a woman he pulled over. The balance of power between the two is so vastly skewed one way.

I don't particularly think Clinton should have been impeached over it, and it was clearly politically motivated, but come on, calling that affair consensual is just flat out wrong.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by caelric

It was about as consensual as a 4 star general and a private having an affair, or teacher and a student, or police officer asking for sex from a woman he pulled over. The balance of power between the two is so vastly skewed one way.

I don't particularly think Clinton should have been impeached over it, and it was clearly politically motivated, but come on, calling that affair consensual is just flat out wrong.

---

The "balance of power" argument is one made mostly by the "alt-left" that Parkbandit so despises, and not one I find particularly persuasive, either. The military is free to set their own rules for the purposes of maintaining discipline, and the police issues are obvious, but FYI, most colleges don't prohibit relationships or casual encounters between adult students and professors as long as they're of legal age and the student isn't in one of the professor's classes directly or in another supervisory role.

Lewinsky was 22 years old at the time, and maintained -- for decades -- that her involvement with him was consensual. (FYI, Clinton has been credibly accused by other people, and this particular interaction being arguable doesn't constitute a defense of him personally in other encounters). Lewinsky's changed her tune in recent years after the #MeToo movement. There's an argument to be made about power dynamics, but the notion that an adult human not under the influence or being coerced by violence isn't capable of determining their own ability to consent in a given situation is, in my opinion, specious.

Wow. Just wow. It amazes me that you are defending that. Actually, it doesn't amaze me. Clinton is one of your sacred saints. But to call that relationship consensual, it really shows how fucked in the head you are.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by caelric

Wow. Just wow. It amazes me that you are defending that. Actually, it doesn't amaze me. Clinton is one of your sacred saints. But to call that relationship consensual, it really shows how fucked in the head you are.

---

Please. Clinton is a scumbag who's, again, been credibly accused of sexual assault by a bunch of people. And his wife is opportunistic as hell for sticking with him despite it, and attacked those people who he victimized. That doesn't mean the impeachment wasn't a sham, nor that his interaction with Lewinsky wasn't consensual, which, again, she also maintained for decades.

But by all means, take your bad faith, politically motivated shots wherever you can get them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

You're getting the Paula Jones case and the Lewinsky case mixed up. Clinton was impeached for lying about the Lewinsky case, which was consensual, and not sexual harassment. The vote on the Jones case wasn't successfully passed, and Clinton wasn't impeached on that charge. You are an idiot, and your ignorance of major events that occurred when you were a middle-aged adult reflects on you.

---

I'm not confusing anything.

President Bill Clinton sexually harassed the intern Monica Lewinsky.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ashliana

Please. Clinton is a scumbag who's, again, been credibly accused of sexual assault by a bunch of people. And his wife is opportunistic as hell for sticking with him despite it, and attacked those people who he victimized. That doesn't mean the impeachment wasn't a sham, nor that his interaction with Lewinsky wasn't consensual, which, again, she also maintained for decades.

But by all means, take your bad faith, politically motivated shots wherever you can get them.

---

Confirmed. You're seriously fucked in the head. I mean, we all knew that already, but this is just more proof.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

I'm not confusing anything.

President Bill Clinton sexually harassed the intern Monica Lewinsky.

---

You referred to "sexual harassment being a high crime" and that Clinton was impeached for it by Republicans. Which he wasn't, you're factually incorrect. You're entitled to your own (delusional) take on the surrounding events, but that doesn't mean your assertion is contained in the articles of impeachment that passed the House in 1998, which pertained to his lying to the grand jury about the sexual nature of their relationship, and not about "sexual harassment." Perhaps you should have, y'know, read those articles when they were newsworthy. When you were a middle-aged adult in the 90's.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by caelric

Confirmed. You're seriously fucked in the head. I mean, we all knew that already, but this is just more proof.

---

Confirmed. You think 22 year old adults, not under the influence of alcohol or drugs, can't make informed decisions about their sex lives. We knew you infantilized women as a Republican, but jeez.