Russia Investigation Heating Up

Oh god.. I hope It doesn't sashay into the fray. I have posted SEVEN times in a single thread without anyone interrupting me.

OMG! Buzzfeed News is saying that President Trump went over to Michael Cohen's house and kicked the shit out of him!

Here's the proof!

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/01...7837297485.jpg


IMPEACH HIM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Androidpk

I lied

---

Finally, an honest and accurate post from pk

https://media.giphy.com/media/1Z02vuppxP1Pa/giphy.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tgo01

For the far leftist morons still pushing the "Mueller didn't say the Buzzfeed story was fake!"

This is directly from the Washington Post:



Mueller's aims was to make clear that NONE OF THOSE STATEMENTS IN THE STORY ARE ACCURATE. Right there in plain English for even the simplest of mind to read and comprehend. And hey look, they cited anonymous sources so you know it's true.

---

Mocks people for using anonymous sources. Pushes anonymous source when it fits his extremist agenda. Talk about desperation :lol:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

STILL waiting on that cite source that said the CIA and FBI believe Trump is a Russian spy.

---

Sure thing buddy, soon as you cite your source that this is all a big conspiracy started by Hillary. I know you won't though, because you have nothing, absolutely nothing, that will back that up. Maybe Infowars can help out.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by time4fun

Your reading comprehension deficits are showing, as usual.

Mueller's team could have released a statement that said: The OSC has not determined that that President Trump directed Cohen to alter his Congressional testimony. Instead, they released this incredibly vague statement that focused on specific pieces of evidence, not the actual conclusion of the article.

It's almost guaranteed that the sources here were *not* from Mueller's team. The BuzzFeed article positions them specifically as not being a part of the OSC. So this is probably information from one of the other investigations- likely this is from SDNY (who raided Cohen's office).

Secondly- there are already numerous Court filings that more or less support the notion that Cohen was working with people in the Trump orbit to prepare for his Congressional testimony.

Finally- the OSC's release doesn't say that Buzzfeed's conclusion is inaccurate- it's calling into question what the OSC has specifically been told and the characterization of their documents. It actually very much leaves open the possibility that Cohen told SDNY all of this, and *they* relayed it to OSC, for example. It also leaves open the possibility that the culmination of various pieces of evidence lead to this conclusion, but that the OSC doesn't have any single piece of evidence that ties it all together.

I'm not saying that BuzzFeed's article isn't currently in question. I'm saying that the OSC's statement has some really interesting language here, and that's worth paying attention to. We don't know the motivation behind the statement.

---

https://media1.tenor.com/images/7d05...itemid=4558036

You’re so desperate :lol:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neveragain

PK's daily pavlovian reaction is reaching the level of epic.

Ding!

---

https://youtu.be/LSHWzOXJDSs

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Androidpk

Sure thing buddy, soon as you cite your source that this is all a big conspiracy started by Hillary. I know you won't though, because you have nothing, absolutely nothing, that will back that up. Maybe Infowars can help out.

---

You are the biggest bitch to ever be on the PC. Which is really saying something because we’ve had some really hardcore trash come through here over the years.

Please keep posting.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

So.. in your head.. you believe that Donald Trump is a Russian agent here to infiltrate our government?

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Androidpk

The CIA and FBI think so.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

Cite a source that isn't as full of shit as you are?

---

I'll give you this.. your NOU game is strong.

It's too bad you can't make a living using it.

Unfortunately, all the reader has to do is go back to this point in our conversation to realize you are doing nothing but deflecting.

I'll accept your deflection as "I have no idea what the fuck I'm talking about. At this point, I'm just posting as much as I can about how much I hate Trump because time4fun said I have to or I'll be evicted off her couch"

People with extreme political views ‘cannot tell when they are wrong’, study finds