They are the weapon of choice for this sort of thing are they not?
We did this type of thing before and it helped.
Printable View
Pull up some official stats, handguns are by far used more for crimes. These "assault" rifles are expensive as fuck which makes them difficult to get, they did the same shit in the 90's with the mac 10, it was all bullshit then and it's all bullshit now. We didn't have problems with shooting up our schools, the guns have not changed.
You're late to the discussion. We've already talked about regular crime vs. Spectacular crime like these shooting sprees. Gun statistics don't measure the impact of these shootings well. The response to the students from Parkland does though. They've lit a fire.
A fire?.....Like the Russian fire in the other thread?
You need to unplug dude. This will be forgot about by the end of the working week.
P.S. Here is the list of weapons used in Columbine:
Intratec TEC-DC9.
Hi-Point 995 Carbine.
Savage 67H pump-action shotgun.
Stevens 311D double barreled sawed-off shotgun.
99 explosives.
4 knives.
Maybe, maybe not. I'd say its rash to make these bold declarations at this point.
Quote:
A prominent Republican political donor demanded on Saturday that the party pass legislation to restrict access to guns, and vowed not to contribute to any candidates or electioneering groups that did not support a ban on the sale of military-style firearms to civilians.
Al Hoffman Jr., a Florida-based real estate developer who was a leading fund-raiser for George W. Bush’s campaigns, said he would seek to marshal support among other Republican political donors for a renewed assault weapons ban.
What do you think is more extreme? Banning a constitutional right or clear backpacks?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TJObNzyc8M