Climate Change Report

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Johnny Five

lol @ Al Gore on the cover. You are such a tool.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cwolff

This looks good. Unfortunately, the deniers won't read it and the non-deniers won't be surprised.

---

See what I mean. It's so predictable. but AL GORE!!!

How about this cover. Is this better because the Christian Science Monitor is on it?

http://i.ebayimg.com/00/s/NjAwWDQwMA...SfCoC/$_12.JPG

Or maybe this one. It's got a quote from Science on there. Is that O.K.?

http://i.ebayimg.com/00/s/NTAwWDUwMA...!Iw~~60_12.JPG

Or how about this one. It doesn't even have recommendation on the cover.

http://i.ebayimg.com/00/$T2eC16dHJGg..._id=89040003C1

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jarvan

This is for you Cwolff...



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_atheism

88.33% of the world believes in a God, the Debate is over, God exists. We shouldn't have news stories about atheists anymore.

- Edit - The 9.66% just don't identify with a set religion, so it could be argued that the numbers are 97.99% for and 2.01% against. Which is higher then climate change according to you.

---

Since global warming is people like cwolff's religion, does that technically make him part of the 88.33%?

Perhaps we need to form some sort or consensus in order to avoid a lengthy debate.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cwolff

See what I mean. It's so predictable. but AL GORE!!!

How about this cover. Is this better because the Christian Science Monitor is on it?

http://i.ebayimg.com/00/s/NjAwWDQwMA...SfCoC/$_12.JPG

Or maybe this one. It's got a quote from Science on there. Is that O.K.?

http://i.ebayimg.com/00/s/NTAwWDUwMA...!Iw~~60_12.JPG

Or how about this one. It doesn't even have recommendation on the cover.

http://i.ebayimg.com/00/$T2eC16dHJGg..._id=89040003C1

---

Is this a Book about how those scientists obscured the data on climate change to make it fit the narrative they wanted to tell?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cwolff

See what I mean. It's so predictable. but AL GORE!!!

---

You don't mind if we quote this next time you're all like "OMG FOX NEWS!!!" right?

Quote:

---

How about this cover. Is this better because the Christian Science Monitor is on it?

http://i.ebayimg.com/00/s/NjAwWDQwMA...SfCoC/$_12.JPG

Or maybe this one. It's got a quote from Science on there. Is that O.K.?

http://i.ebayimg.com/00/s/NTAwWDUwMA...!Iw~~60_12.JPG

Or how about this one. It doesn't even have recommendation on the cover.

http://i.ebayimg.com/00/$T2eC16dHJGg..._id=89040003C1

---

http://cdn.memegenerator.net/instanc...x/18715163.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Methais

Since global warming is people like cwolff's religion, does that technically make him part of the 88.33%?

Perhaps we need to form some sort or consensus in order to avoid a lengthy debate.

---

Well, it's simple. We just declare the debate over, and force people to accept that there is a God. Next we have to figure out how to get them to join us in this belief.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Methais

You don't mind if we quote this next time you're all like "OMG FOX NEWS!!!" right?

---

I do not mind and encourage you to quote me more. I doubt it will help you, but it can't hurt.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rolfard

The debate ought to be are we sure we can make as big an impact to the climate in both directions or are we just being egotistical

---

Well, the article linked to start this entire thread stated unequivocally that what's already done is "...essentially irreversible on human timescales." I'm gonna really get a chuckle when someone tries to come up with plans for artificial global cooling and really fucks everything up.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cwolff

I do not mind and encourage you to quote me more. I doubt it will help you, but it can't hurt.

---

It has nothing to do with helping anything so much as it's really just pointing out what a flaming retarded hypocrite you are.

Not that that's some shocking revelation or anything though.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Thondalar

Well, the article linked to start this entire thread stated unequivocally that what's already done is "...essentially irreversible on human timescales." I'm gonna really get a chuckle when someone tries to come up with plans for artificial global cooling and really fucks everything up.

---

That's the truth there. Sometimes people talk about cloud seeding and shit to do some cooling. Ya, that's going to end well.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Methais

You don't mind if we quote this next time you're all like "OMG FOX NEWS!!!" right?

---

You just have to go back a couple dozen pages in this very thread to point to cwolff doing this exact same thing.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cwolff

Watched about 10 minutes of that 2003 video. Noticed that Patrick Moore showed up around minute 4 to refute the ACC warnings. Ya, that Patrick Moore. The greenpeace guy who's now shilling for the energy industry. Scary that this Penn and Teller bit resonates more with you than any amount of scholarship published.

---

He even admitted he only watched up until the point that Patrick Moore showed up in the video (which was at the 4 minute mark of a 30 minute video.)

Only difference is Patrick Moore makes a few bucks running a consultant business and Al Gore has made himself a billionaire by selling his fear across the globe.