I'm curious if you get off on making dumb whataboutism claims or if you just really think that two events are so mutually inclusive that you can't consider sedition on behalf of a sitting President, without also considering a completely unrelated events that had nothing to do with said attempted coup? I'll you a hint, one is state/local jurisdiction, while the other (sedition) is a federal crime. Moron.
It's not a "whataboutism" when the first acts of violence were Democrats rioting in 2017. They attacked federal buildings, they torched police departments, they torched churches.
I think we'll start in chronological order.
09-14-2023, 02:50 PM
Neveragain
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seran
This didn't age so well for Kevin McCarthy. In 2019 he felt impeachment inquiries shouldn't occur without a full bipartisan vote or be used for political purposes, but here he is unilaterally opening an impeachment inquiry of a sitting President for something his son did.
I'm curious if you get off on making dumb whataboutism claims or if you just really think that two events are so mutually inclusive that you can't consider sedition on behalf of a sitting President, without also considering a completely unrelated events that had nothing to do with said attempted coup? I'll you a hint, one is state/local jurisdiction, while the other (sedition) is a federal crime. Moron.