Alec Baldwin shooting

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seran

He failed to check a gun he had a reasonable expectation would be harmless, by a professional who should have confirmed it had hot ammunition. I'm sure he'll be found guilty of some sort of misdemeanor negligence, and pay miiillions in restitution to the family.

---

There's no such thing as reasonable expectation with this. First rule of gun safety is to always assume the gun is loaded until you check it yourself and verify that it isn't.

You'll white knight for him all day anyway because you're a simp to all things left, but it won't make you any less wrong.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Methais

First rule of gun safety is to always assume the gun is loaded until you check it yourself and verify that it isn't.

---

Is that a Methais rule, or it is the law? They're not always the same thing.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ClydeR

Is that a Methais rule, or it is the law? They're not always the same thing.

---

Read my post again, but this time pay attention to the words. Retard.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Methais

Read my post again, but this time pay attention to the words. Retard.

---

That's what I thought. You just made it up, and now you're acting offended that somebody called you out on it. The case in court will be tried on actual rules.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ClydeR

That's what I thought. You just made it up, and now you're acting offended that somebody called you out on it. The case in court will be tried on actual rules.

---

The case in court will be tried on actual laws, not rules.

Retard.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ClydeR

That's what I thought. You just made it up, and now you're acting offended that somebody called you out on it. The case in court will be tried on actual rules.

---

That's fantastic. Now point out where I said anything about how it creates a legal issue, as opposed to just a Baldwin being a dumbass issue.

Dumb fuck.


Fun fact: If Baldwin would have heeded this very important rule, none of this would have happened. But he's a limp dick like you, so here we are.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seran

He failed to check a gun he had a reasonable expectation would be harmless

---

There is never a reasonable expectation of a gun being harmless.

The jury should also be made aware of Baldwins past and his incapability to control his angry outbursts. I believe his previous outburst, before shooting a co-worker, was fighting with a man over a parking spot. Sounds very stable.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neveragain

There is never a reasonable expectation of a gun being harmless.

The jury should also be made aware of Baldwins past and his incapability to control his angry outbursts. I believe his previous outburst, before shooting a co-worker, was fighting with a man over a parking spot. Sounds very stable.

---

Wasn't he the one who called and left a nasty voicemail to his daughter also? And numerous examples of extreme TDS. I think he already settled the civil suite by paying off the family of the woman he shot, and I very much doubt he'll do any time at all for this, but it'll be fun to see him drug through the mud with all his violent outbursts put on trial in hopefully court tv. You know, like Kyle "Hero of Kenosha" Rittenhouse, slayer of two and a half hardened criminals.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Suppa Hobbit Mage

Wasn't he the one who called and left a nasty voicemail to his daughter also? And numerous examples of extreme TDS. I think he already settled the civil suite by paying off the family of the woman he shot, and I very much doubt he'll do any time at all for this, but it'll be fun to see him drug through the mud with all his violent outbursts put on trial in hopefully court tv. You know, like Kyle "Hero of Kenosha" Rittenhouse, slayer of two and a half hardened criminals.

---

That was Mel Gibson.


In related news:

https://i.imgur.com/nGuxZXS.png

It was Baldwin too: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0G45DOOm80c