Things that made you Facepalm today (Political Version)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Shaps

https://www.yahoo.com/news/china-rus...160230084.html

"China, Russia send warships near Alaska; US responds with Navy destroyers"

Good thing we got rid of Orange Man though right?

Fucking war mongering Democrats. WW3 was going to happen under who again? Morons.

---

United States Navy protects American navigable waters, Conservatives cry because they no longer support law or protecting our territory, What a world we live in, bunch of orange man loving snowflakes.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Solkern

I’m not sure what exactly you are getting it? He posted a veiled threat online, and guess what? The DOJ already decided to request a protective order because of it, and the judge agreed, funny how that works… looks like they did argue in front of a judge and won.

Once again, do you know what a veiled threat is? The key is ambiguity and plausible deniability.

And also, I’m not saying what he did was illegal, I’m saying what he did was stupid, coming out of court, as a defendant, and making a veiled threat online, is stupid. Anyone who would do something like that, is an idiot.

Imagine you are in court, and say, “if I go to jail, I’m going to come after you” sure, maybe you’ll come after them with nice comments, or maybe flowers, or with a gun? Who knows, that’s plausible deniability, in a veiled threat. How do you think the judge is going to take that? You never mentioned the judge, or anyone by name, or what you are going to do.
Any normal person would take that as a threat.

---

You're falling into the pit trap of irrationality that is the modern far right imbecile. They believe the wealthy should have free reign to do whatever they want and are immune to civil or criminal repercussions on the 'Right of Wealth' they have dreamt up.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Solkern

I’m not sure what exactly you are getting it? He posted a veiled threat online, and guess what? The DOJ already decided to request a protective order because of it, and the judge agreed, funny how that works… looks like they did argue in front of a judge and won.

Once again, do you know what a veiled threat is? The key is ambiguity and plausible deniability.

And also, I’m not saying what he did was illegal, I’m saying what he did was stupid, coming out of court, as a defendant, and making a veiled threat online, is stupid. Anyone who would do something like that, is an idiot.

Imagine you are in court, and say, “if I go to jail, I’m going to come after you” sure, maybe you’ll come after them with nice comments, or maybe flowers, or with a gun? Who knows, that’s plausible deniability, in a veiled threat. How do you think the judge is going to take that? You never mentioned the judge, or anyone by name, or what you are going to do.
Any normal person would take that as a threat.

---

My understanding of this protective order is that it states Trump and his legal team is ordered not to share anything with the public that the prosecution reveals to them through discovery before the trial. Trump and his team is supposed to be adhering to that anyways. It’s not like he can’t come X feet of the judge or prosecutor nor is barred from saying anything about them online.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Solkern

You act like because other people have done, he can do it too and it’s ok!! Wtf? If other people have committed serious crimes, does that mean it makes what someone else did ok, or less of a crime?

If that’s the case, you better stop complaining about the alleged Biden and Burmisa corruption, and pay out, since other politicians have done this before!

It’s like you don’t think before you post.

I think you completely misunderstood the point of my post. I think it was stupid of him to make veiled threats, right after he made a court appearance as a defendant with serious allegations against him, it looks really fucking bad.

Any defendant who would make comments like that is a fucking idiot, and more so for Trump because he’s a public and political figure, running for office.

That’s literally it.

---

What would your thoughts be if he instead said, "When I win back the presidency, all these blatantly corrupt people involved in this illegal witch hunt are going to be investigated and possibly prosecuted."

Would you still be crying and pearl clutching then with this performance outrage of yours if he posted that instead? Why or why not?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Solkern

I’m not sure what exactly you are getting it? He posted a veiled threat online, and guess what? The DOJ already decided to request a protective order because of it, and the judge agreed, funny how that works… looks like they did argue in front of a judge and won.

Once again, do you know what a veiled threat is? The key is ambiguity and plausible deniability.

And also, I’m not saying what he did was illegal, I’m saying what he did was stupid, coming out of court, as a defendant, and making a veiled threat online, is stupid. Anyone who would do something like that, is an idiot.

Imagine you are in court, and say, “if I go to jail, I’m going to come after you” sure, maybe you’ll come after them with nice comments, or maybe flowers, or with a gun? Who knows, that’s plausible deniability, in a veiled threat. How do you think the judge is going to take that? You never mentioned the judge, or anyone by name, or what you are going to do.
Any normal person would take that as a threat.

---

Hahahahahaha oh my bad, I guess if the Biden DOJ and their pocket judges say it's legit, then it must be legit.

I'm honestly not sure if you're arguing in bad faith or if you're really this clueless about the whole situation.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seran

You're falling into the pit trap of irrationality that is the modern far right imbecile. They believe the wealthy should have free reign to do whatever they want and are immune to civil or criminal repercussions on the 'Right of Wealth' they have dreamt up.

---

Does this include Joe and Hunter? They're both rich as fuck.

Funny how retards like you constantly shriek EAT THE RICH and all this and that, but you only direct it towards people on the right.

This is because you're the most brain dead NPC of all NPCs.

Dumbass.

https://nypost.com/wp-content/upload...0016939428.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seran

United States Navy protects American navigable waters, Conservatives cry because they no longer support law or protecting our territory, What a world we live in, bunch of orange man loving snowflakes.

---

https://www.theweek.co.uk/92967/are-...ds-world-war-3

"Is World War Three on the horizon?"

https://www.usnews.com/news/best-cou...ia-ukraine-war

"Fears About WWIII Are Growing Amid Russia-Ukraine War, Survey Finds"

https://www.businessinsider.com/conf...ng-2023-2023-1

"5 places World War III could start in 2023"

https://www.euronews.com/2023/07/12/...-near-nuclear-

"Russia's former Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev has accused NATO of bringing World War Three closer by giving Ukraine military aid."

Say what again?

All these years and you still haven't learned... morons like you never will I suppose.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Methais

Hahahahahaha oh my bad, I guess if the Biden DOJ and their pocket judges say it's legit, then it must be legit.

I'm honestly not sure if you're arguing in bad faith or if you're really this clueless about the whole situation.




Does this include Joe and Hunter? They're both rich as fuck.

Funny how retards like you constantly shriek EAT THE RICH and all this and that, but you only direct it towards people on the right.

This is because you're the most brain dead NPC of all NPCs.

Dumbass.

---

Joe Biden has always been a warrior for the blue collar worker.

Also

Delaware is the nations corporate tax haven.


https://thumbs.gfycat.com/Adolescent...restricted.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Suppressed Poet

My understanding of this protective order is that it states Trump and his legal team is ordered not to share anything with the public that the prosecution reveals to them through discovery before the trial. Trump and his team is supposed to be adhering to that anyways. It’s not like he can’t come X feet of the judge or prosecutor nor is barred from saying anything about them online.

---

I’m not saying that either, but a protective order was issued, because of that Truth social post. It’s obvious the judge took what he posted as some type of threat, the discovery will have names, and the judge doesn’t want that to get out, because of his post.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Methais

What would your thoughts be if he instead said, "When I win back the presidency, all these blatantly corrupt people involved in this illegal witch hunt are going to be investigated and possibly prosecuted."

Would you still be crying and pearl clutching then with this performance outrage of yours if he posted that instead? Why or why not?

---

I still don’t quite understand what are you trying to get at? Are you having a PB moment? Seems like you are.

Methais, let’s try this again. He made a veiled threat right after being in court as a defendant, which was stupid. Anyone who would do that, is a fucking idiot.

That’s literally all I am saying.

If anyone would have done that, I would have made the same fucking post, it’s not because it was Trump.
I’m not talking about illegal, or legal, I’m saying it was stupid to make a veiled threat right after a court appearance where you are being charged with serious crimes.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seran

United States Navy protects American navigable waters, Conservatives cry because they no longer support law or protecting our territory, What a world we live in, bunch of orange man loving snowflakes.

---

You know you are making no sense at all right now, right?

Oh shit.. you have no idea.

Nevermind...