Russia Investigation Heating Up

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SHAFT

You wish you were me, dickhole.

Your wife wishes you were me. Your kids too.

---

You wish. Continue your meltdown.. yours has been one of the best ones to witness.

Quote:

---

Funny thing is... if I were you, I’d kill myself.

---

Feel free to pretend you are me.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cwolff

DAMN!! Old Boy is going to need this video to recover from that.

---

"OMG SICK BURN!"

Are you 12... or just the intellectual age of a 12 year old?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

"OMG SICK BURN!"

Are you 12... or just the intellectual age of a 12 year old?

---

Real friends don't let friends drink soy.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

Yes, yes.. remind us how you went to the best schools and make more money than all of us combined again. I mean, this is the Internet and all.. you can be anything you want. Heck, you could actually be a girl here!



Convenient that you choose "within the last year", given how solid you were in the tank for Hillary. And you were 100% wrong about the travel bans.. where I was 100% correct. I wasn't shocked at all when the 9th Circus Court denied them... and said they would easily be overturned by SCOTUS. Guess what happened? Oh, that's right: Exactly what I said would.



You have yet to prove anything. Like I said when you first posted your "ZOMG I WUZ RIGHT 18 TIMES! LOOK!" I imagine with the time you took to construct the list, you probably wanted us to print it out and put it on our fridge.. but let's be honest: It was a pure fictional account.



Like I stated before... when you actually join us in the real reality, you will realize how utterly stupid you look right now and hopefully slink away to join Whirlin on another message board.

---

So first- if you have to go back more than a year to find more than one thing I've been wrong about- you don't have a very strong case. If we extend out to two years- we're up to two things. Given how many things I've argued/predicted/etc that's a hell of a track record. And you know it. And- again- given that you have disagreed with me on virtually every issue for the last two years that means you have a hell of a track record too. I mean, it's hard to be that wrong so consistently.

And, I do love how you are trying to turn this around. When I posted a quick list of 18 things, your deflection defense was to say "Prove it!" because you banked on me not being willing to take the time to find the quotes- even though you are perfectly aware of what your stances were on all of those issues. Now, your defense is "I bet it took a long time to find those quotes!" As though somehow that means I didn't find them, and you weren't wrong. Spoiler alert- it took about 20 minutes. And coming up with that list took me about 2. And both exercises were wildly entertaining. You do say some utterly ridiculous things.


I presented you with your own words, and you still can't admit that you were wrong. The depth of your denial is now reaching clinical levels.

I'm not the one who looks stupid right now my dear. That distinction has always been yours.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by time4fun

So first- if you have to go back more than a year to find more than one thing I've been wrong about- you don't have a very strong case.

---

I don't even have to go back a week:

An acquittal is an official verdict of innocence.
You can be tried for the exact same crime more than once after being found not guilty if the government finds more evidence.

There you go. You can shut up now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by time4fun

So first- if you have to go back more than a year to find more than one thing I've been wrong about- you don't have a very strong case. If we extend out to two years- we're up to two things. Given how many things I've argued/predicted/etc that's a hell of a track record. And you know it. And- again- given that you have disagreed with me on virtually every issue for the last two years that means you have a hell of a track record too. I mean, it's hard to be that wrong so consistently.

And, I do love how you are trying to turn this around. When I posted a quick list of 18 things, your deflection defense was to say "Prove it!" because you banked on me not being willing to take the time to find the quotes- even though you are perfectly aware of what your stances were on all of those issues. Now, your defense is "I bet it took a long time to find those quotes!" As though somehow that means I didn't find them, and you weren't wrong. Spoiler alert- it took about 20 minutes. And coming up with that list took me about 2. And both exercises were wildly entertaining. You do say some utterly ridiculous things.


I presented you with your own words, and you still can't admit that you were wrong. The depth of your denial is now reaching clinical levels.

I'm not the one who looks stupid right now my dear. That distinction has always been yours.

---

You do realize that you are acknowledging your long-standing fight with another internet persona. What a total waste of RL time.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fortybox

You do realize that you are acknowledging your long-standing fight with another internet persona. What a total waste of RL time.

---

Self awareness is one of her greatest weaknesses.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by time4fun

So first- if you have to go back more than a year to find more than one thing I've been wrong about- you don't have a very strong case. If we extend out to two years- we're up to two things. Given how many things I've argued/predicted/etc that's a hell of a track record. And you know it. And- again- given that you have disagreed with me on virtually every issue for the last two years that means you have a hell of a track record too. I mean, it's hard to be that wrong so consistently.

And, I do love how you are trying to turn this around. When I posted a quick list of 18 things, your deflection defense was to say "Prove it!" because you banked on me not being willing to take the time to find the quotes- even though you are perfectly aware of what your stances were on all of those issues. Now, your defense is "I bet it took a long time to find those quotes!" As though somehow that means I didn't find them, and you weren't wrong. Spoiler alert- it took about 20 minutes. And coming up with that list took me about 2. And both exercises were wildly entertaining. You do say some utterly ridiculous things.


I presented you with your own words, and you still can't admit that you were wrong. The depth of your denial is now reaching clinical levels.

I'm not the one who looks stupid right now my dear. That distinction has always been yours.

---

I didn't comb through your posts to find 3 examples of how wrong you were.. they were off the top of my head.

YOU are the one that spent a Friday night hoping and praying to find some quotes of mine.. and couldn't even do that right since you had 18 fictional accounts of things I was "wrong" about and you were "right" about.. but when called out, you gave maybe a half dozen quotes of mine that didn't prove a single thing.

And your "logic" was that because I disagree with you and you were right, therefore I must be wrong.

http://e.lvme.me/pzv5j7l.jpg

You really should take a real logic course after your pre-K Self Awareness seminar.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parkbandit

I didn't comb through your posts to find 3 examples of how wrong you were.. they were off the top of my head.

YOU are the one that spent a Friday night hoping and praying to find some quotes of mine.. and couldn't even do that right since you had 18 fictional accounts of things I was "wrong" about and you were "right" about.. but when called out, you gave maybe a half dozen quotes of mine that didn't prove a single thing.

And your "logic" was that because I disagree with you and you were right, therefore I must be wrong.

http://e.lvme.me/pzv5j7l.jpg

You really should take a real logic course after your pre-K Self Awareness seminar.

---

ROFL

So first the problem was that I just made these things up. Now it's that I made my list by finding old quotes of yours critizing claims that turned out to be true or saying things that turned out to be untrue. But those quotes show just how wrong I was somehow.

And also the problem is I didn't find enough quotes and only bothered to show you were wrong on half of them. But also I lose because I took time to find quotes proving you were wrong after you explicitly asked me to find quotes.

Your arguments are all over the place. Like someone throwing every dart they have at the board because they were caught being wrong multiple times.

Oh sorry, you were just "kidding" when you said those things.


But let's get to the heart of it. You were banking on me not bothering to find quotes of you arguing things you absolutely argued. Then I did, and you panicked and starting your traditional snarling and frothing at the mouth.

I will acknowledge that there was one claim I looked for and couldn't find: you saying Clinton was going to be indicted. (Though you constantly criticized the notion that she hadn't done anything that warranted prosecution). But your argument was that it was due to political considerations. Meanwhile the Trump administration's own Inspector General found no evidence that the decision not to prosecute had anything to do with political considerations.

So I was wrong about which part you were wrong on. Everything else was incredibly easy to find and didn't take long. I didn't really feel the need to spend more than 20 minutes looking at your blooper reel.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by time4fun

ROFL

So first the problem was that I just made these things up. Now it's that I made my list by finding old quotes of yours critizing claims that turned out to be true or saying things that turned out to be untrue. But those quotes show just how wrong I was somehow.

And also the problem is I didn't find enough quotes and only bothered to show you were wrong on half of them. But also I lose because I took time to find quotes proving you were wrong after you explicitly asked me to find quotes.

Your arguments are all over the place. Like someone throwing every dart they have at the board because they were caught being wrong multiple times.

Oh sorry, you were just "kidding" when you said those things.


But let's get to the heart of it. You were banking on me not bothering to find quotes of you arguing things you absolutely argued. Then I did, and you panicked and starting your traditional snarling and frothing at the mouth.

I will acknowledge that there was one claim I looked for and couldn't find: you saying Clinton was going to be indicted. (Though you constantly criticized the notion that she hadn't done anything that warranted prosecution). But your argument was that it was due to political considerations. Meanwhile the Trump administration's own Inspector General found no evidence that the decision not to prosecute had anything to do with political considerations.

So I was wrong about which part you were wrong on. Everything else was incredibly easy to find and didn't take long. I didn't really feel the need to spend more than 20 minutes looking at your blooper reel.

---

Someone's trying for cwolff's belt!

Let's review.. remember when you posted this list of 18 things I was "wrong" about?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by time4fun

Oh that's hilarious.

You were wrong about the following:

1) Trump having extensive Russian ties
2) The Trump Campaign having dozens of contacts with the Russian government
3) Russia interfering with our elections
4) Coney's firing being serious enough to warrant an investigation
5) Clinton not being indicted for anything
6) Trump self-dealing and breaking numerous laws with his foundation
7) The Trump Tower meeting involving a meeting with a Russian government representative and a conversation about both sanctions and the Russian government offering help to the campaign (i.e. Collusion)
8) The Mueller investigation being legitimate and actually leading to indictments
9) Flynn actually having lied about his own Russian contacts
10) Comey having been fired specifically over the Russia investigation
11) Democrats being heavily favored to win back the House
12) The first two Muslim bans being illegal (how quickly they forget)
13) The tax bill causing inflation to rise
14) Several parts of the Steele Dossier having been corroborated
15) The Steele Dossier not being what started the Russia investigation
16) Carter Page being a Russian spy
17) The Carter Page FISA warrant application not being based on the Steele Dossier
18) The Carter Page FISA warrant application did mention the Steele Dossier was a piece of opportunities research

The list goes on and on.

And here's why you people are always so incredibly wrong: you listen to people who lie to you over and over again. And you're so deeply stupid that you keep going back for more

---

And the "list goes on and on"... so at a minimum, I was expecting you to back this list up.

You came back with literally 8 quotes of mine. Not even half.

Of those 8 quotes, you literally proved 1, which I already gave you credit for in your original list.

1 out of 18.

You knocked it out of the park with this one! 1 out of 18 is probably the best you've ever done!

I think someone deserves special recognition today! Do people know how hard it is to get a 5 1/2 on a test?? It's damn near impossible!

GOOD JOB!
http://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/080...g?v=1523044295