So, it is your position that if a media company engages in political rhetoric that incites violence and property damage, they should be held accountable and face the consequences?
01-14-2021, 04:41 PM
Methais
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
So, it is your position that if a media company engages in political rhetoric that incites violence and property damage, they should be held accountable and face the consequences?
It is my position that if a media company that I don't agree with engages in political rhetoric that I don't agree with, they should be held accountable and face the consequences.
01-14-2021, 06:03 PM
Back
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
So, it is your position that if a media company engages in political rhetoric that incites violence and property damage, they should be held accountable and face the consequences?
I thought my statement in the post was pretty clear. What about it?
01-14-2021, 06:36 PM
Parkbandit
Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
I thought my statement in the post was pretty clear. What about it?
Your statement goes against pretty much your entire posting history on this forum.
So, seems like my revision is far more accurate.
But we both knew that.
01-14-2021, 06:44 PM
Back
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Your statement goes against pretty much your entire posting history on this forum.
So, seems like my revision is far more accurate.
But we both knew that.
No.
No.
No.
Anything else?
01-14-2021, 08:33 PM
Parkbandit
Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
No.
No.
No.
Anything else?
Yes. Just answer the original question:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
So, it is your position that if a media company engages in political rhetoric that incites violence and property damage, they should be held accountable and face the consequences?