Maybe he will flip next year back to Trump?Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Printable View
Maybe he will flip next year back to Trump?Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
You are a stupid retard. :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
But is it heating up?
yes
Legally it can't but thank you for playing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Legally speaking there is 0 reason why the gang of 8 can't get the unredacted report and there is 0 reason why the summaries prepared by Mueller can't be released. For once in your pathetic life stop trying to be so damn retarded.Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~
Funny you should mention that, just today in my news feed:Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
https://www.dailywire.com/news/45827...y-hank-berrienQuote:
Starr Admits He Omitted In FBI Report That Hillary Catalyzed Vince Foster's Suicide, Report Says
Except the laws about disclosing grand jury testimony and disclosing classified information that is above the security level of some of the members involved. As to the Mueller summary, well, the only people that care about that are idiots like you, idiots in congress that have used this issue as their platform for 2 1/2 years and idiots on TV that less viewer numbers on national TV than PewDiePie on a very bad day.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
It really isn't.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Gang of 8 can see anything. Jesus Christ, you really are an obtuse retard. And shocker, look at the alt right troll talking about pewdiepie. You really are a bottom feeding scumbag racist.Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~
2 years and Mueller's team never leaked once. Now that Barr is trying to bury the report and mislead the public on the findings Mueller's team is leaking. Yes, that is heating up.Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCranium
Yeah, ummmm, no. They can't see the report. When your only argument is an insult and labeling me alt right and racist, rational people know you have lost.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
I do console myself in the knowledge that I don't view another race as inferior like you and other Leftists do, I don't seek to enslave the people with government programs and I don't arrogantly assume that everyone that labels themselves similar to me politically must vote the way I do like you Leftists do.
One of Obama and Clinton's council is expected to be indicted via the ongoing Russian investigation...so I guess. It is heating up for him.Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCranium
Yes, they can see it. Maybe you should actually look into what the gang of 8 can see before spouting off your usual bullshit. And yes, there are plenty of labels that can correctly be applied to a psychopath such as yourself, who's on a FBI watch list because of how fucking crazy you are. Don't go blowing up any federal buildings, please.Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~
Damn you have a hard on about how nuts you think I am. You should see someone about that, such obsession is unhealthy.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Your posting history speaks for itself, Kaczynski.Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~
Yes yes, we know, you are threatened by someone that does not agree with you and thinks that people ought not be slaves to the government. Run along little Leftist, go play with the other dopamine addled children all looking for their feel good fix.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
You're retarded.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
:lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaczynski
Back on topic.. Julian Assange was booted from the Ecuadorian embassy and promptly arrested by British police. Betting he's getting a free ticket to the US rsn.
So, it's not heating up.. still.
Weird.
THE DAILY BEAST TOLD PK IT WAS TRUMP THEREFORE IT WAS TRUMP!!!!!!!!!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
https://media1.tenor.com/images/98d5...itemid=5699289
The only troll here is you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
You're also a piece of shit, a thief, a pathological liar, extremely stupid, and an all around worthless scumbag of a human being.
While we're tossing random shit out, remember when you raped Gnome Rage?Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
According to Androidpk we have to believe everything Bobmuthol said so this is correct.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/11/polit...ted/index.html
Quote:
A federal grand jury on Thursday indicted Greg Craig, a prominent Democratic attorney who worked for two presidents, charging him with false statements and concealing material information in connection with work he performed for Ukraine.
Welp, there went the "But none of my people have been indicted" line from Obama.
It's all so Hillaryious in an ironical, Clintonian sort of way.Quote:
Originally Posted by drauz
https://victorygirlsblog.com/wp-cont...06017956-5.jpg
"Pretend it's my vagina Sergey."
Pks response, "But it's only one!"
I'm starting to get the picture.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfster
He'll just ignore it and pretend it didn't happen instead of responding to it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfster
Because he enjoys drinking from penis.
Quote:
Attorney General William P. Barr will hold a news conference Thursday to discuss special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s final report, adding a must-see-TV event to the day he will release the long-awaited document.
President Trump revealed the plan during a radio appearance, and a Justice Department spokeswoman later confirmed it. The news conference will occur at 9:30 a.m., and Barr, appearing alongside Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein, will take questions. It was not immediately clear whether the news conference would occur before or after the report’s release.
More...
Remember Trump's first explanation for firing Comey? It was because Comey held a news conference to discuss the decision not to indict Clinton.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClydeR
https://media.giphy.com/media/Gt4FaBEFngjL2/giphy.gif
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D4cL-2GXsAAIini.jpg:large
His twitter game is strong.
Pft, it is obvious the Russians got to Mueller.Quote:
Originally Posted by Suppa Hobbit Mage
What’s left for the far left who bought into this hoax, like Androidpk? I’m guessing that the next step is: “We only got to see x% of the report! We need to see the FULL report to really know if there was no collusion” or “Mueller was a Republican.. he is nothing but a Trump guy. We need to get to the bottom of this with a new independent council”Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
They've been attacking Barr and the redactions since it was announced he was adding them in. They'll probably continue to do that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Hell, they were attacking Barr for holding a press conference prior to releasing the report because it would bias the reader to his interpretation.
They are already way ahead of you there.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Oh, I did legit see a twitter comment from some rando seriously saying The Russians got to Mueller.
I’m at a job site with shit service, so I can’t tell. I just have been around far too long to know the stupidity of the left to just accept the findings and move on. They have far too much invested in this to admit they were fooled.Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Rocktar~
There are retarded randos on both sides.. but I bet we will see some blue checks saying the same stupid things soon enoughQuote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
Schumer called the Barr press conference a Trump campaign press conference, rather than the AG of the Department of Justice speaking about a report.
Was Schumer reading, head down, facing directly at his podium when he made this off the cuff statement?Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
It was a tweet, so who knows?Quote:
Originally Posted by Suppa Hobbit Mage
https://twitter.com/SenSchumer/statu...7Ctwgr%5Etweet
Way to ruin my epic burn.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
Nobody even ACKNOWLEDGED my epic burn the other day. It was flippin' amazing, too. It integrated the source material and everything.Quote:
Originally Posted by Suppa Hobbit Mage
To be fair.. most people probably don’t read your posts given that they are usually long winded and full of nonsense.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stumplicker
No offense.
“So.. no collusion.. no obstruction.. but DAMMIT there has to be SOMETHING in that report we can use against Trump!!!! We came up with the hoax and it’s not fair he isn’t getting impeached over it!!”Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
I pretty much read the first sentence and the last one and sometimes a random one from the body.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Too bad time4gm cannot comment on this anymore. Would have loved to hear the spin. Oh well, there will soon be 683 gender options in character creation instead.
People over at CNN are already pulling out the "But...but Trump was ANGRY during the investigation! This proves guilt!"
The same line they used against Kavanaugh.
Anyone post the link yet?
Searchable version:
https://viewfromll2.files.wordpress....ler-report.pdf
Get your Republican propaganda away from me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Taernath
I wish I had the technical prowess to hack that site, and replace it with a bunch of stuff designed to trigger everyone on both sides. Things like, he clearly colluded, but no real evidence, but we have real evidence of collusion with Clinton. Just to make heads explode.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
I'd replace it with softcore amish cosplay porn.Quote:
Originally Posted by Suppa Hobbit Mage
Well, in Clinton's defense, there's plenty of evidence that he colluded with Monica Lewinsky. She didn't inhale, though.Quote:
Originally Posted by Suppa Hobbit Mage
Let us all have a moment of silence in thanks for the fact that in 1992, the nation stopped to fixate on a dress stained with semen, and now we have 500 variants of CSI and NCIS where all the things are covered in semen. Dresses don't have semen on them anymore, like in the good old days. Now the internet just argues for a few days about what color they are.
It's happening.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
https://i.imgur.com/G0oadUb.jpg
Nadler is about to speak.
My prognostications:
Obstruction.
Everything else doesn't matter. Focus will be on obstruction and underlying materials to look for dirt. All of this, will result in nothing.
Other predictions:
Barr skewed the results, and is a Russian agent
We need to subpoena Mueller, who is a Russian agent
Rosenstein is an agent, for Russia
Also:
Shit and Swallow will cry.
Any cooincidence that Assange was recently nabbed from the embassy in London?
Things that make you go, hmm.
That's retarded. Ecuador told us he was getting booted 10 days ago.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
In today's news, it's clear to me Trump is very lucky to have a group of strong willed people around him. Otherwise, he WOULD have obstructed.
Still didn't, though.
This is correct.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrathbringer
Mueller said they couldn't exonerate Trump on obstruction.Quote:
Originally Posted by Suppa Hobbit Mage
Also, 14 cases referred for criminality, 12 which are still ongoing. Mueller also made the case for prosecuting Trumo Trump when he's out of office.
I feel bad for Trumo Trump.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Shut up loser go get a job already.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
1992? You might wanna give that another shot.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stumplicker
I refuse to google even ONE thing. 199...1? Also I think it was that Flowers lady with the dress, not Lewinsky. 1990?Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Clinton wasn't even President in any of the years you've listed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stumplicker
I thought Bush Sr. ended in 88....nevermind, Reagan ended in 88. I was 5. Okay so it was like 94/95 then, the Clinton thing. ....maybe 98...Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
I would remember this way better if the whole scandal had been backed by Ace of Base or Soundgarden. Or in the case of 98, Backstreet Boys or N'sync. It couldn't have been TOO deep into the 90s, because by the early 2000s, Monica Lewinsky was doing MTV specials with Tom Green where they ding dong ditched houses in Canada. Seriously. That happened once.
The "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" speech was in 1998. He was impeached in December 1998.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stumplicker
Well if it had been done to a soundtrack of Quit Playing Games With My Heart on repeat I'd have remembered that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
Anyway, I was in the right decade at least, so it counts.
No, it doesn't count. You are wrong and you should feel bad.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stumplicker
I do feel bad. Someday I wanna be president so interns will blow me. Those are independent statements. I just felt it was important to note.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
I take everything back! I don't feel bad and I was right after all! Gennifer Flowers was 1992 (During Clinton's presidential run)! Retroactively and accidentally correct is the best kind of correct!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gennifer_Flowers
....crap, it was Lewinsky with the dress after all.
This is why nobody should ever google anything.
Probably because he tried too, and no one did what he asked.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Androidpk2019: I will accept the results of the Mueller reportQuote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Barr releases summary
Androidpk2019: I will accept the results of the Mueller report when it's released
Barr releases Mueller report (which says the same thing as his summary)
Androidpk2019: I will accept the results of the Mueller report when it's FULLY released (knowing it will never be fully unredacted..)
Shocking. Really.
Everyone really thought you would be a stand up guy.
Really.
Androidpk now going for the "He only got away because he's president! He'll be in prison as soon as he's out of office!" argument now?
I swear, literally every time I think "No way Androidpk can sink any lower than this" he somehow manages to surprise me. How is that even possible? How does someone somehow earn less respect when their respect level was already in the negative to begin with? It's like one of those paradoxes where it turns out you are somehow your own grandfather.
Don't give him any ideas.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
I'm just wondering how he got someone pregnant to begin with. He must have been crying the whole time what with her making noises during sex. Or he was wearing noise canceling headphones the entire time.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashlander
No noise made if she's unconscious.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
No, because Mueller followed the DOJ memo that a sitting POTUS cannot be indicted.Quote:
Originally Posted by Suppa Hobbit Mage
https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trum...former-1400976
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
oh no, the black hating, gay bashing, neo nazi doesn't respect me... Whatever will I do now?!?I
Meanwhile tgo still crying himself to sleep every night since Jussie Smollett was exonerated :lol:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Zero. Self. Awareness.You are the only person on the planet, besides maybe Smollett himself, that believes that.Quote:
Meanwhile tgo still crying himself to sleep every night since Jussie Smollett was exonerated :lol:
I know, in your head, you believe that triggers people.. but they are actually disbelieving someone can be that fucking stupid.
Androidpk is so angry. I figured reading some posts from PB would cheer him up.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Everyone here knows you're a retarded retard. It's extremely sad that you continue to post here knowing that. And hilarious.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
I like that one of T4Fs last posts here was calling Pk stupid.
And then Androidpk proceeded to downplay it then pretend like she never did. That dude must love the anal violation he gets on a nightly basis.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
He likes the free couch he gets to live on.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
You need some serious psychological counseling dude. :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
It was more along the lines that she thought me and tgo both had shitty reading comprehension.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
https://media.giphy.com/media/hdCVcfA6YOTKg/giphy.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by Stumplicker
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
https://media2.giphy.com/media/LGyBF8rydMrUQ/giphy.gif
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
In before pk's like I'M A STRONG INDEPENDENT WOMAN YOU CAN'T FORCE ME TO READ THAT!!!!!! LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/t/disp...d-65312619.jpg
People with shitty reading comprehension are typically pretty stupid.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Like you. You're pretty stupid. And you think it's cool.
Try this for "reading comprehension" there PK, CNN actually READ the Mueller report (We know you never have because of the shit coming out your mouth) and it turns out that Obama KNEW it was going on and did, lemme check here, oh NOTHING about it.
So yes, Trump was not a Russian agent no matter how much that chaps your ass, but Obama apparently knew about the meddling as far back as 2014 and let it happen. So who's to blame for it, oh I guess that would be the Dems. Moron.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/19/opini...ngs/index.html
"There's no way we could possibly know this until the FULLY UNREDACTED report is released to the public. Until then:Quote:
Originally Posted by Slider
1) Trump is a Russian agent.
2) Collusion was already proven in court multiple times.
C) Trump needs to be impeached."
“I will accept the results of the Mueller investigation.” -also pkQuote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
In his defense, almost 10% is redacted. It might be saying "TRUMP IS A RUSSIAN AGENT" behind all those black lines. YOU DON'T KNOW!Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
At 2:59am today, Trump tweeted his anger against Paul Krugman..
What did Krugman do to deserve the attention of the President? The President did not give a detailed list of all the things that Krugman has done, but the latest is this article from yesterday in the New York Times..
Quote:
So all the “fake news” was true. A hostile foreign power intervened in the presidential election, hoping to install Donald Trump in the White House. The Trump campaign was aware of this intervention and welcomed it. And once in power, Trump tried to block any inquiry into what happened.
Never mind attempts to spin this story as somehow not meeting some definitions of collusion or obstruction of justice. The fact is that the occupant of the White House betrayed his country. And the question everyone is asking is, what will Democrats do about it?
But notice that the question is only about Democrats. Everyone (correctly) takes it as a given that Republicans will do nothing. Why?
More...
stfu Ososis.Quote:
Originally Posted by ClydeR
Is Krugman referring to the Russians that were hired by fusion GPS? (This sounds like collusion)Quote:
Originally Posted by ClydeR
Why does Krugman give a pass to the Obama administration for doing nothing about the Russians? (This sounds like Obama knew Hillary was colluding with the Russians)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UcjaO2953os
shutup maclyderQuote:
Originally Posted by ClydeR
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-5U7sYyJfrc...-spiderman.pngQuote:
Originally Posted by ClydeR
Why do you continue to side with the political party that paid Russian assets to infiltrate an American political campaign?Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
I know you are a confused individual but what conspiracy are you pushing now?Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
The only conspiracy is the one the Democrats have tried selling for the past 3 years.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
We get it Back, you hate christians so much that you will take sides with the Russians and the Muslim extremists.
You mean the recent investigation that conclusively found Russian meddling in our elections?Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
Only the Christians who mean harm to me, my family, my friends, and our peaceful way of life. The only side I am on is peace and progress.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
No, the Russians that Clinton hired (fusion GPS) to set up a meeting with the Trump campaign.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
What Christians mean harm to you and yours? I mean we know that you and your ilk want to murder every child before they reach 12 months of age.
The ones who like to wear hoods and burn crosses on people's lawns, or otherwise want America to be a pure white nation.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
What about Muslims who want to kill all non-Muslims and love murdering peaceful Christians for fun? They your enemy too?Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
What do you think? Of course. I can't believe I have to spell that out for you. You get way to hung up on finding some false equivalence with everything that it distorts your perception of reality.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Thats an interesting way of saying I think the woman should have a choice of what happens to her own body.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
That was never a conspiracy. The conspiracy was that the Trump administration was colluding with Russia.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Russia meddling in our elections was supposed to be stopped in it's track when President Obama said "Stop it".
Weird how that didn't happen though...
https://media1.tenor.com/images/d591...temid=13138796
Which Christians would those be specifically?Quote:
Only the Christians who mean harm to me, my family, my friends, and our peaceful way of life. The only side I am on is peace and progress.
You mean Democrat KKK members? I didn't know they terrorize hipster retards.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
How many of those do you think there are, in the US? Couldn't really get PK to answer that one, so since you think it's a big deal... how big is it?Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Since I think its a big deal. You disagree? You don't think there is a white nationalist movement in this country? Or anywhere in the world?Quote:
Originally Posted by Suppa Hobbit Mage
I feel like if people were wearing hoods and burning crosses it would be in the news.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
I want to hear you say it! SAY RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISM!!!11Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
You have to use your imagination. Catholic teenage boys wearing red hats and smiling is literally the same thing as wearing white hoods and burning crosses in people's yards.Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCranium
Nowadays, in Charleston, they march with patio tiki torches or infiltrate a church and murder everyone while they are praying.Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCranium
Pretty amazing watching Back equate Christians with white supremacists without even taking a breath.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
And yet he still can't say radical Islamic terrorism is bad and is a threat to our society.
Not surprised you can't follow a thread.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Extremists of any kind, who threaten peace and progress, are a threat to society.
I expect you will twist that around to mean something else.
Sure I can follow a thread. You were asked which Christians are a threat to you, you replied with the ones who wear hoods and burn crosses, Richardcranium said if that shit was happening regularly it would be in the news, you then mentioned examples of violent white supremacists. You went from Christians -> murderous white supremacists.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
And yet you STILL won't say radical Islamic terrorism is bad and is a threat to our society. You're like the Obama without the stutter.
When have you ever seen a Muslim white supremacist? Did I say all Christians are white supremacists?Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
The Christians who are a direct threat to me, my family, and friends, are the white supremacist kind.
As I said before... Extremists of any kind, who threaten peace and progress, are a threat to society.
Islamic terrorists are a threat to our society. White supremacists are a threat to our society. Any group that utilizes terror is a threat to our society.
Why are you just assuming those white supremacists were Christians, or that their actions had anything at all to do with their Christian faith? You're really reaching here, brosky.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
I'll pull back a bit and say yeah, I don't know what everyone's faith was at the Charleston rally.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
But the KKK is a recognized Christian organization.
That's dumb. Can you name some Christians who are like "Hey them KKK, they sure do represent our beliefs!"Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Because I can find dozens of examples of prominent Muslims who are perfectly okay with terrorism. Shit Ilhan Omar thinks we're too mean to convicted terrorists and asked Trump to do more to free a Muslim Brotherhood leader in Egypt.
It's weird that I have yet to meet a KKK member in my 50 years on this planet, yet every Democrat I meet supports murdering the most innocent of humans.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
https://youtu.be/eKrEVWGTuRg?t=94Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Well how many, since you think it's a big deal, is it? Round to thousands if you want. How many would you say there are, in the US.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Its difficult to determine when the cowards won't come out and say who they are. The KKK wears/wore masks to hide their identity. There is more than 1 and thats too many.Quote:
Originally Posted by Suppa Hobbit Mage
I don't know if you heard but there was a big Unite the Right march in Charlottssville in 2017 where a peaceful protester was killed by a white supremacist.
Its a big deal.
They are so cowardly they won't admit they are white supremacists, but they are totally dangerous and are going to destroy this country.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Yes, violent white supremacists are dangerous, but I don't think it's a "growing threat" like the left suggests it is. If anything the number is probably shrinking every year, assuming you only count actual violent white supremacists and don't count everyone the media and the SPLC lumps in with white supremacists because of their agenda.
A black person has a greater chance of being murdered in the womb than the probability of ever even passing a KKK member on the sidewalk. Why do you support murdering black children?Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Probably because you're a closet racist.
You can't even quantify how many? I figured with this imminent take over by white supremacists you'd have an idea how many there are. Ok, instead of rounding to thousands, just give me a ratio. Like, 1 in 100? In 2010, "Non-Hispanic whites totaled about 197,285,202" per the US census. So what ratio of them do you think are white supremacists?Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
https://media.giphy.com/media/2Tn10AXN6B98k/giphy.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by Back
It was literally a Democrat organization.. but we don't want to talk about that, do we...
I agree... though I don't remember you complaining about Antifa members being cowards and wearing masks to hide their identity... I do wonder why that is?Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
All whites are racist.Quote:
Originally Posted by Suppa Hobbit Mage
DUH
Who are these Christians, specifically?Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
That would be fantastic if you had any clue what either of those things were.Quote:
The only side I am on is peace and progress.
And by "her own body" you mean the baby's body that the woman and some dude put there, which isn't actually the woman's body.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Your extreme stupidity threatens peace and progress.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Stop being a terrorist.
Reported to the Easter Worshipper police.
https://scontent.fbtr1-1.fna.fbcdn.n...dc&oe=5D304337
Golly, sounds just like your buddies in Antifa.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
No, I can't. Why should I? Why should I know who is and who isn't? Especially when they don't come out and say who they are? And who said imminent take over? This bullshit has been on the rise since Trumps election. You know it. Everyone knows it. Don't dance around with semantics to try to downplay it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Suppa Hobbit Mage
I saw the Unite the Right march and the car drive into that crowd. These people are real and they are here. These white supremacist assholes are a threat to me, my family, and our way of life. Fuck them.
Mexican wrestlers also wear masks. What about them?Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
They are terrorists too.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Again, I wonder why I even attempt rational discussion with you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Obama was more divisive to this country than Trump ever could be. Trump is a direct response to that divisiveness. Because you know what Trump is, while Obama hid behind being an eloquent speaker. You know it. Everyone knows it. Don't dance around semantics to try and downplay it.
You are so fucking triggered, you are a threat to me, my family and normal people everywhere. Fuck you. Seriously, no homo, drop the bong and get some testosterone shots.
I'd say it's been reported on more since Trump's election but I'm not so sure about it being on the rise much.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kUyM8HSYYuM&t=373sQuote:
Originally Posted by Back
What happened on the streets of Washington on this day, when there is supposed to be a peaceful transfer of power, is why I don't care about Charlottesville. The thought that nobody was going to end up getting killed after how the left has acted over the past 12 years is an ignorant thought. I'm actually shocked that more people have not been killed. Hell, if not for a leftist being a terrible shot, a large number of Republican leaders would be dead now. One of them being a promising future presidential candidate.
.........I just can't anymore. You're by far the dumbest fucking person on the PC, possibly the internet. I feel ashamed for even replying now.
You better give our champion a little more R-E-S-P-E-C-T than that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
Back: White supremacists exist. I don't know how many of them exist because reasons, but it's still a HUGE epidemic that's rapidly growing because one asshole ran someone over a few years ago!!!!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Wrong. Luchadors wear masks. Not all Mexican wrestlers are Luchadors. Only racists believe that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Racist.
Mexican isn't a race.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
(Insert long winded explanation of post-pleistocene migration patterns to South America and subsequent muddling of racial features by Iberian influences here. Assume it's exceptionally compelling.)Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
Doesn't matter, CNN said talking about Mexicans is racist therefore it's racist. Just like proper grammar and being polite. All racist.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
ftfyQuote:
Originally Posted by Stumplicker
He ignores his own post immediately?Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
Wouldn't you?Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Hey I already skipped the three paragraph rant and cut it down to two sentences for you. Cutting it down further would've been beyond my capability. Here's my final word on Mexican as a race. I'll tell you what I tell Ariond.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
Be a Mexican, not a Mexican't.
Posting nothing is a pretty good way to cut it down further.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stumplicker
:lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
https://media.giphy.com/media/JevdkAaBSdOTe/giphy.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by Fortybox
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suppa Hobbit Mage
Your responses tell the whole story. Most people agree that white supremacists can go fuck themselves. Its literally what they want anyway.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
But not you guys.
What, that we think you are probably the dumbest person on these boards? One person says it, ok... maybe they don't like you. Two people... well maybe they don't like you. But everyone?Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
It's not us, it's you.
"If you don't agree with me, then you are siding with white supremacists and are one..."Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Your "logic" is really, really retarded.
This post wins the Most Correct Post of the Week award.Quote:
Originally Posted by Suppa Hobbit Mage
I'm too lazy to go back and quote Back but the biggest threat to peace and progress is stupid people.
I used to think the term useful idiot was a dumb one but it fits Back perfectly.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeril
Trouble is, Earth is full of stupid people.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeril
Clunk
No, we're all the stupid ones and Back is the only one who's right.Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCranium
The problem isn't him being stupid, it's that everyone else isn't smart enough to keep up.
https://media1.tenor.com/images/76f1...itemid=6021225
Oh, I agree.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeril
Look at climate change. Even with all the evidence, including witnessing it occur in real time, there are people who refuse to believe it. Ignoring evidence right in front of your face is stupid.
This is correct.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
In Quebec, there will be towns where the government will forbid people to remain there.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
The Major of an average town said, yesterday, that the downtown will changed cause there will be no more houses near it anymore.
There's major flooding like there was ever and it's getting worst year by year.
Of course, it's all a coincidence.
https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/dike-b...omes-1.4398536
https://montrealgazette.com/news/loc...s-and-highways
Nothing has changed. Only stupid people try to use a 150 year sample size out of billions of years and present it as science.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Like nothing at all has changed with the climate.
Let's keep our hoaxes in their perspective topics. This is about the Russian Collusion Hoax that really, really stupid people bought into (people like you) and after 2 years of "investigating" was proven to be exactly that... a hoax.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...-investigation
tl;dr: Mueller sent a letter to Barr stating he felt the summary Barr released did not "fully capture the context, nature, and substance" of the investigation. The DOJ was confused because they felt Mueller agreed with the summary. So Barr calls Mueller and Mueller states nothing in the summary was "inaccurate or misleading" but he was frustrated with the lack of context and the resulting media coverage in regards to the obstruction analysis.Quote:
Robert Mueller wrote a letter to Attorney General William Barr complaining Barr's four-page summary did not " fully capture the context, nature, and substance" of his team's two-year investigation into President Trump and his 2016 campaign, according to a report.
"The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this office’s work and conclusions. There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation. This threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the Department appointed the Special Counsel: to assure full public confidence in the outcome of the investigations," Mueller wrote, according to a copy of the letter obtained by the Washington Post.
The letter took the Department of Justice by surprise because they were under the impression Mueller agreed with the summary, which stated the special counsel did not find anyone on Trump's campaign conspired "with the Russian government in its efforts to interfere with the 2016 presidential election."
Barr, with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, then concluded Trump did not commit obstruction of justice.
Barr and Mueller later spoke, with Mueller again expressing concern over how the summary, which he said was not inaccurate, and the investigation were being misinterpreted by the media.
A DOJ spokesperson : "After the Attorney General received Special Counsel Mueller’s letter, he called him to discuss it. In a cordial and professional conversion, the Special Counsel emphasized that nothing in the Attorney General’s March 24 letter was inaccurate or misleading. But, he expressed frustration over the lack of context and the resulting media coverage regarding the Special Counsel’s obstruction analysis."
The redacted version of the special counsel's report was finally released in April.
Funny part is the media is currently taking Mueller's letter out of context and twisting his words around to make it look like Mueller thinks Barr's summary was misleading.
So Mueller is upset about a lack of context and how the media is covering the report and in response they take his comment out of context and use his words to attack Barr.
Just another day in the American media.
http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/...tschebank.html
Trump suggests that he can ignore subpeonas because he hasn't had his nappy or blankey yet
Your TL;DR is essentially what happens if you take a truthful statement and run it through an alt-right transmogrifier.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
https://media.giphy.com/media/xUOxfl...FYK4/giphy.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by sellstuff1
Is this your response to the "crisis actors" at Sandy Hook, you miserable excuse for a human?Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Dude.. the "Intelligencer"?Quote:
Originally Posted by sellstuff1
You're hilarious.
Thank you for still being so fucking triggered Trump is your President.
No, that is him literally making fun of what a retarded clown you are.Quote:
Originally Posted by sellstuff1
Not even close to 1/10th as triggered as you were about Obama. Just search your own post history, retard.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
https://media.tenor.com/images/41751...473b/tenor.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by sellstuff1
You either have a reading comprehension problem or you are finding it difficult to find any posts of mine triggered by Obama, so you just made that up.Quote:
Originally Posted by sellstuff1
Either way, there is no one here more triggered than you are about Trump being your President.
No one.
How many dicks have jizzed balls deep in your ass so far this morning?Quote:
Originally Posted by sellstuff1
I think it is funny how sellstuff keeps going AlEx JoNeS AlTrIgHT and all that. I've literally never once sat down to watch Alex Jones. Or listen to him. Or read his website. Or whatever the fuck it is he does.
Gay frog hypno-lactation.
3 Democrat senators voted to confirm Barr. Two of them, Manchin from WV, and Doug Jones from Alabama (who will be lucky if he gets a second term), said they are disappointed in their votes and would probably vote not to confirm if they had a second chance.
Meanwhile Sinema from Arizona didn't comment one way or another but her office told reporters that she requested a meeting with Barr.
Once again Sinema somehow comes off as more of a Republican from Arizona than both McCain and Jeff Flake combined. How is this even possible?
All of those Democrats who thought the Democrats "won" in Arizona must be kicking themselves now.
I honestly think she's just back burnered the report. She didn't appear to have any personal (from my knowledge) opinion/gamble in the report and she's watching shit go tits up for anyone not stupid enough to bark out hatred.
A reporter asked Trump what he thought about Russia's involvement in Venezuela.
Trump: "Russia has to get out."
Putin must have buyer's remorse from this puppet he bought.
Trump says whatever is best in the moment
Is this new to politics?Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfster
Not in the least bit, just saying ..his words are worthless.
Trump knows that if the Democrats call Mueller to testify, it will just end up showing that the whole thing was a hoax. Trump doesn't want to humiliate the Democrats anymroe than they've already humiliated themselves. That's why he's calling on Mueller not to testify. No point rubbing it in. And that's the only reason he doesn't want Mueller to testify.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfster
Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
As are most politicians. Like the current crop of Democrat hopefuls.. now giving credit to Obama for the recovery that even Obama himself said was impossible.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfster
That's why you can't listen to politicians and actually use your own brain.
He's not wrong. There are people, like you, that are very upset by the Mueller report findings and want to reinvestigate it again and again until they come up with the results they desire.Quote:
Originally Posted by ClydeR
35 million dollars pissed away that anyone with 1/4 of a functional brain knew would be the end result.
This is correct.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Quote:
The White House formally asserted executive privilege over special counsel Robert S Mueller III’s report Wednesday, President Trump’s first use of the executive authority in the latest confrontation with Congress.
Assistant Attorney General Stephen E. Boyd wrote in a letter to Congress that Trump had “asserted executive privilege over the entirety of the subpoenaed materials.” Boyd wrote that Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler’s push to hold Barr in contempt had “terminated” their negotiations over what materials lawmakers would be allowed to view from Mueller’s investigation.
More...
The entire Mueller report is now executively privileged. If you previously downloaded a copy, you need to delete it immediately. And if you read it, then you need to forget it and not talk about it. Starting right now, nobody can discuss its contents in this forum.
What about Orange man bad though? WHAT WILL YOU TALK ABOUT?!Quote:
Originally Posted by ClydeR
You are so bad at this.Quote:
Originally Posted by ClydeR
And so fucking triggered.
Makes me happy.
Dems are so desperate. Barr can’t give Congress a full redacted report, given there is Grand Jury testimony in it.
In other news... Trump found employment for yet another person, even in the #METOO environment. Man, he's got the economy on FIRE.
https://pagesix.com/2019/05/08/billy...-tape-scandal/
Just how many dildos were you able to fit up your ass today?Quote:
Originally Posted by ClydeR