.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
The report exonerated Trump as far as Russian collusion goes. Can you be a man for 2 seconds and just admit that?Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Printable View
.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
The report exonerated Trump as far as Russian collusion goes. Can you be a man for 2 seconds and just admit that?Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Here:Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Special Counsel Robert Mueller's report on Russian meddling in the 2016 election did not find that any U.S. or Trump campaign officials knowingly conspired with Russia, according to details released on Sunday.
http://news.trust.org/item/20190324193542-i87ff
Morning Joe host Joe Scarborough praised Robert Mueller‘s findings that there was no collusion between Donald Trump‘s campaign and Russia, calling the special counsel conclusion “good news” for all Americans today.
“If the appointment of Robert Mueller was the worst day of his presidency, the release of Robert Mueller’s report was the best day of his presidency,” Scarborough began on the morning after Attorney General Barr released a summary of Mueller’s probe into Russia and Trump. “So that’s a big headline.”
“But also another big headline: It is good news,” he added, a comment his co-host and wife Mika Brzezinski agreed with. “Democrats, Independents, and Republicans alike, it is good news.”
https://www.mediaite.com/tv/morning-...e-with-russia/
Trump 'didn't conspire with Russia' in 2016 polls: US attorney general
https://www.rediff.com/news/report/t...l/20190325.htm
The Mueller report, long thought by Democrats to be the key to ousting President Donald Trump, may instead become a powerful tool for his re-election campaign.
After 22 months, special counsel Robert Mueller reported he found no evidence of anyone on the 2016 Trump campaign conspiring with the Russian government to throw that election, and Attorney General William Barr said he didn't see sufficient evidence to prosecute the president for obstruction of justice.
https://www.nbc.com/
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...er-report.html
It doesn't get any more clear on how wrong you are about everything.
But.. please continue with your "B-b-b-b-but what about obstruction!!!!!!!??????" because your meltdown has no end in sight.
In a way, it literally is his job.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
His time4job.
Literally, from Barr's summary of the Mueller investigation:
the Special Counsel did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple offers from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.
Literally, I don't think it can get much clearer than that.
But Barr said Trump was not exonerated! If I close my eyes really tight, shove my fingers in my ears, and keep yelling "I can't hear you!" I can just keep pretending that part had to do with Russian collusion!Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Lindsey Graham Retweeted James Comey
Could not agree more. See you soon.
Lindsey Graham added,
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D2dD7zDU8AAMqjO.jpg
James ComeyVerified account @Comey
So many questions.
6:05 PM - 24 Mar 2019
I particularly enjoyed the part where AG Barr said the investigation was with merit and entirely legal, squashing all the alt right frothing conspiracy theories that this was an illegal coup attempt and a conspiracy started by Hillary Clinton.
My respect level for Lindsey Graham was probably at a -3 prior to the nomination and a -6 directly after Trump was nominated. He came across as a butthurt little bitch for most of the debates.
But since Trump's election, he's found his balls again and now my respect level is up to a solid 7.. maybe even an 8 after that tweet.
wutQuote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
And yet.. zero evidence.. which leads right back to Hillary Clinton handlers making the entire thing up to excuse the biggest election flop in US history.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Also, I never said it was illegal and the merit derived from the left's insistence that "ZOMG RUSSIA!!!!!!!!"
Just man up.. admit you were duped and we can all go back to making fun of the hundreds of other personality/moral flaws you have.
I particularly enjoyed the part where you turned out to be wrong just like the rest of us expected and are reacting exactly as predicted.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Because you're dumb and butthurt and predictable as fuck because you have no ability to think for yourself.
Because you're also a huge tard.
You need to see a psychiatrist, then use your pro-bono lawyer to bring up a class action lawsuit against the DNC for trying to fix the 2016 democratic primaries and lying to you about Russian collusion.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
The american voters are coming to the realization that giving the house to the Democrats was a huge mistake because they will do nothing but reflect their TDR for the next 2 years.
Sorry.. tried to do a copy/paste.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
So, Comey.. the disgraced former head of the FBI sent out a tweet after the report was disclosed to have no evidence of Trump collusion that said "So many questions".
Lindsey Graham responded to the tweet that said "Could not agree more, see you soon"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
So I guess the answer to my question is no, no you cannot be a man for 2 seconds and admit when you're wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Except I'm not wrong. I'm literally quoting the article that YOU linked. Stop being a mouth breathing 400 lb neckbeard for 2 seconds and admit you're wrong.
Even the very biased Washington Post article I gave to you spells this out so even a simpleton like you can understand:Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
I even bolded the words to make it extra super easy for you to understand. Just 1 second? Just 1 second of being a man? Can you muster 1 second of being a man, Androidpk?Quote:
“The Special Counsel . . . did not draw a conclusion — one way or the other — as to whether the examined conduct constituted obstruction,” Barr’s letter to lawmakers states.
“The Special Counsel states that ‘while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,’ ” the letter says, signaling that Mueller’s team struggled with the issue.
I'm guessing "No."Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
When you sign up to get pegged for couch "rent", you pretty much stop being a man.
400 lb neckbeard virgin living in his mom's basement tells other man to man up... :lol2:Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Okay, come on, just a quarter of a second of being a man? That's practically nothing. Just be a man for one quarter of one second and admit that Mueller exonerated Trump as far as Russian collusion. Just 1/4th of one second. Then you can go right back to spreading your ass cheeks for time4fun.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
tgo fantasizes about men sticking objects up their assesQuote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Don't have the will to be a man for even a quarter of a second.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Sad.
This is correct.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Stop PM'ing me asking me for nudes, it's not gonna happen.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Is this like when you demanded that Bobmuhthol send you videos of him masturbating?Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
I totally remember that. And Androidpk was like "I can't help it, I'm obsessed over dicks from young boys."Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Remember that, Androidpk?
Has nothing to do with will. Has everything to do with ability.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
True. When you sell your soul to the devil for a place to sleep it comes with a price.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClydeR
Unfortunately for Trump, the Mueller report stymied his plan at step 3, unless he can find some other reason to provoke the House into impeaching him. After the Mueller brouhaha dies down in a couple of weeks, Trump will face the prospect of running a real reelection campaign. For Trump, the economy will become the most important factor. Democrats, who may have been infatuated with candidates from the far left, will refocus on electability in the general election. Overall, it is a bad development for Trump. I mean it's good that he won't have to go to jail with his lawyer, campaign managers, foreign policy consultant and National Security Adviser. But still. Not good for Trump's reelection.
ewww, you're one sick fuckQuote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Fixed. And correct.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
John McCain has a better chance of winning in 2020 than Trump does :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by ClydeR
Quoted for when Trump wins in 2020 and you try to say you never said this because you're a fucking retard. A true retard's retard.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Watching far leftists such as Androidpk have a full meltdown on Twitter demanding Barr release the full Mueller report is the highlight of my day. Maybe even the entire week.
The butthurt is never ending.
No, you're clearly just having meltdown after meltdown for some unknown reason despite the good news, and PK has been owning you all day long over it because he's so witty and clever and doesn't suffer from TDS or any other mental illnesses at all, and is a trustworthy upstanding citizen whose honesty and integrity is beyond question.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Incoming tgo rage quitting PC and Gemstone.
:popcorn:
Androidpk is such a sad basket case.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Literally zero learned, considering for the entirety of 2015 and 2016 people said the EXACT same thing. "lol. Trump has no legitimate chance.". Right up until he won. Hell, I was one of them saying that up through the primaries. I'd imagine most people were. They were laughing their asses off at his non-chances way back in 2011 when Comedy Central roasted him, and again in 2016 when Ann Coulter inexplicably showed up to roast Rob Lowe*.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
You have to have your head stuck particularly far up your own ass to not recognize the possibility of it happening again.
* Corrected - Originally forgot the roast she showed up at.
You do realize that Dreavenings are still happening in full and that Simu hasn't shut down shit and aren't going to, right?Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Of course you don't, because you're fucking stupid and toss your own salad.
Quoted 6 months in advance because you're fucking stupid.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk in like 6 months
(CNN) Special counsel Robert Mueller found that no one in the Trump campaign conspired with the Russian government in 2016 -- but Democrats are not ready to accept that finding.
In interviews since Attorney General William Barr issued his four-page letter on Sunday, Democrats have refused to accept that determination, saying there's ample evidence of Trump campaign and Russia contacts that may not have risen to the level of criminal conduct. They are demanding the full release of the Mueller report to determine what else the special counsel found, and they appear intent to continue investigating ties between Trump and Russia.
The Democrat party honestly doesn't even feel like a political party anymore. They resemble more of a mafia.Quote:
Originally Posted by Candor
fixedQuote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
What the report IS conclusive about is that Russia did interfere in the election. The findings by the AG show that Russia did hack the DNC emails. Everyone saw with their own eyes that the efforts of the interference was in Trump's favor.
Since Mueller could not prove a link between Trump or his people and the Russian campaign to interfere in the election Mueller then could not substantiate the charge of obstruction by Trump.
The obstruction charge had nothing to do with Russian collusion. Mueller's report completely exonerated Trump in regards to Russian collusion. The AG and Deputy AG exonerated Trump in regards to obstruction of justice. I shouldn't have to say this a dozen times for you and Androidpk to understand.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Nobody was disputing that Russia meddled. That was never in question.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
The efforts of Hillary being the worst possible candidate was in Trump's favor more than anything else. It's a shame that most of you are still too retarded to understand that.
Easy buddy, read the AG's report for yourself. You'll see that all I did was summarize the AG's summary.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
The actual report should be full of good stuff. Can't wait for that if they ever do let it all out.
I remember when Trump was in Helsinki and he said he believed Putin's words that they weren't involved at all. I wonder if he'll admit he was wrong to trust Putin?Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
You keep saying Trump was exonerated when Mueller says the complete opposite. The facts don't lie.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
When has the government ever released a document to the public that doesn't look like this?Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
http://www.heuristica.ca/wp-content/...Document-2.png
The problem is, retards like you vote for more government control. Why?
https://media.giphy.com/media/lYKvaJ8EQTzCU/giphy.gif
To protect myself, my family and friends, and all good people from crazy misguided idiots like you. Government is necessary to protect the interests of the people.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
Well you summarized it wrong then. You're sounding like Androidpk Jr, trying to tie the obstruction charge to the Russian collusion charge and implying Mueller didn't exonerate the Russian collusion charge. This is wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Mueller, yes Mueller, not Barr, exonerated Trump and his entire campaign and everyone associated with it for the Russian collusion charge. Full stop. Period. That was all on Mueller. Mueller did not deliver the goods like you thought he would.
It is true that Mueller did not exonerate Trump in regards to the obstruction of justice charge, but both the AG AND Deputy AG did exonerate Trump.
No Russian collusion. Thread over. Let's repurpose it.
Is two highly publicized instances of crying wolf enough to dub this decade WolfCryGate yet? Between Kavanaugh and Trump it should be enough.
At what point do we have to start cracking down on wasting I'm guessing at least hundreds of thousands, probably millions of dollars of taxpayer money on political witch hunts?
The courts are not a tool for one political party to score points against the other one. I'm of the opinion that something should be at stake on the part of the accuser in these instances. If nothing else it'd crack way the hell down on frivolous lawsuits in the private sector.
Let's see the long running history of how government has protected it's people.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
1860-65: USA civil war (628,000)Quote:
160 million people died in wars during the 20th century
1886-1908: Belgium-Congo Free State (8 million)
1898: USA-Spain & Philippines (220,000)
1899-02: British-Boer war (100,000)
1899-03: Colombian civil war (120,000)
1899-02: Philippines vs USA (20,000)
1900-01: Boxer rebels against Russia, Britain, France, Japan, USA against rebels (35,000)
1901-32: Saudis vs Arabian kingdoms (?)
1903: Ottomans vs Macedonian rebels (20,000)
1904: Germany vs Namibia (65,000)
1904-05: Japan vs Russia (150,000)
1910-20: Mexican revolution (250,000)
1911: Chinese Revolution (2.4 million)
1911-12: Italian-Ottoman war (20,000)
1912-13: Balkan wars (150,000)
1915-23: Ottoman genocides (1.2 million Armenians, 500,000 Assyrians, 350,000 Greek Pontians and 480,000 Anatolian Greeks)
1914-18: World War I (20 million)
1916: Kyrgyz revolt against Russia (120,000)
1917-21: Soviet revolution (5 million)
1917-19: Greece vs Turkey (45,000)
1918-20: Russian civil war (1 million)
1919-21: Poland vs Soviet Union (27,000)
1928-37: Chinese civil war (2 million)
1931: Japanese Manchurian War (1.1 million)
1932-33: Soviet Union vs Ukraine (10 million)
1932: "La Matanza" in El Salvador (30,000)
1932-35: "Guerra del Chaco" between Bolivia and Paraguay (117.500)
1934: Mao's Long March (170,000)
1936: Italy's invasion of Ethiopia (200,000)
1936-37: Stalin's purges (7-13 million)
1936-39: Spanish civil war (600,000)
1937-45: Japanese invasion of China (500,000)
1939-45: World War II (55 million) including holocaust and Chinese revolution
1946-49: Chinese civil war (1.2 million)
1946-49: Greek civil war (50,000)
1946-54: France-Vietnam war (600,000)
1947: Partition of India and Pakistan (1 million)
1947: Taiwan's uprising against the Kuomintang (30,000)
1948-1958: Colombian civil war (250,000)
1948-1973: Arab-Israeli wars (70,000)
1949-: Indian Muslims vs Hindus (20,000)
1949-50: Mainland China vs Tibet (1,200,000)
1950-53: Korean war (3 million)
1952-59: Kenya's Mau Mau insurrection (20,000)
1954-62: French-Algerian war (368,000)
1958-61: Mao's "Great Leap Forward" (38 million?)
1959: Tibet's uprising against China's occupation (87,000)
1960-90: South Africa vs Africa National Congress (?)
1960-96: Guatemala's civil war (200,000)
1961-98: Indonesia vs West Papua/Irian (100,000)
1961-2003: Kurds vs Iraq (180,000)
1962-75: Mozambique Frelimo vs Portugal (10,000)
1962-75: Angolan FNLA & MPLA vs Portugal (50,000)
1964-73: USA-Vietnam war (3 million)
1965: second India-Pakistan war over Kashmir
1965-66: Indonesian civil war (250,000)
1966-69: Mao's "Cultural Revolution" (11 million?)
1966-2016: Colombia's civil war (200,000)
1967-70: Nigeria-Biafra civil war (800,000)
1968-80: Rhodesia's civil war (?)
1969-: Philippines vs the communist Bagong Hukbong Bayan/ New People's Army (40,000)
1969-79: Idi Amin, Uganda (300,000)
1969-02: IRA - Norther Ireland's civil war (3,000)
1969-79: Francisco Macias Nguema, Equatorial Guinea (50,000)
1971: Pakistan-Bangladesh civil war (500,000)
1972-2014: Philippines vs Muslim separatists (Moro Islamic Liberation Front, etc) (150,000)
1972: Burundi's civil war (300,000)
1972-79: Rhodesia/Zimbabwe's civil war (30,000)
1974-91: Ethiopian civil war (1,000,000)
1975-78: Menghitsu, Ethiopia (1.5 million)
1975-79: Khmer Rouge, Cambodia (1.7 million)
1975-89: Boat people, Vietnam (250,000)
1975-87: civil war in Lebanon (130,000)
1975-87: Laos' civil war (184,000)
1975-2002: Angolan civil war (500,000)
1976-83: Argentina's military regime (20,000)
1976-93: Mozambique's civil war (900,000)
1976-98: Indonesia-East Timor civil war (600,000)
1976-2005: Indonesia-Aceh (GAM) civil war (12,000)
1977-92: El Salvador's civil war (75,000)
1979: Vietnam-China war (30,000)
1979-88: the Soviet Union invades Afghanistan (1.3 million)
1980-88: Iraq-Iran war (435,000)
1980-92: Sendero Luminoso - Peru's civil war (69,000)
1984-: Kurds vs Turkey (35,000)
1981-90: Nicaragua vs Contras (60,000)
1982-90: Hissene Habre, Chad (40,000)
1983-2009: Sri Lanka's civil war (70,000)
1983-2002: Sudanese civil war (2 million)
1986-: Indian Kashmir's civil war (60,000)
1987-: Palestinian Intifada (4,500)
1988-2001: Afghanistan civil war (400,000)
1988-2004: Somalia's civil war (550,000)
1989-2003: Liberian civil war (220,000)
1989-: Uganda vs Lord's Resistance Army (30,000)
1991: Gulf War - large coalition against Iraq to liberate Kuwait (85,000)
1991-97: Congo Kinshasa's civil war (800,000)
1991-2000: Sierra Leone's civil war (200,000)
1991-2009: Russia-Chechnya civil war (200,000)
1991-94: Armenia-Azerbaijan war (35,000)
1992-96: Tajikstan's civil war war (50,000)
1992-96: Yugoslavian wars (260,000)
1992-99: Algerian civil war (150,000)
1993-97: Congo Brazzaville's civil war (100,000)
1993-2005: Burundi's civil war (200,000)
1994: Rwanda's civil war (900,000)
1995-: Pakistani Sunnis vs Shiites (1,300)
1995-: Maoist rebellion in Nepal (12,000)
1998-: Congo Kinshasa/Zaire's war - Rwanda and Uganda vs Zimbabwe, Angola and Namibia (3.8 million)
1998-2000: Ethiopia-Eritrea war (75,000)
1999: Kosovo's liberation war - NATO vs Serbia (2,000)
2001-: Afghanistan's liberation war - USA & UK vs Taliban (40,000)
2001-: Nigeria vs Boko Haram (20,000)
2002-: Cote d'Ivoire's civil war (1,000)
2003-11: Second Iraq-USA war - USA, UK and Australia vs Saddam Hussein's regime and Shiite squads and Sunni extremists (160,000)
2003-09: Sudan vs JEM/Darfur (300,000)
2004-: Sudan vs SPLM & Eritrea (?)
2004-15: Yemen vs Houthis (?)
2004-: Thailand vs Muslim separatists (6,500)
2007-: Pakistan vs Pakistani Taliban (38,000)
2011-18: Iraq's civil war after the withdrawal of the USA (150,000)
2012-: Syria's civil war (320,000)
2013-15: South Sudan vs rebels (10,000)
2014-16: Ukraine's civil war (9,500)
2015-: Saudi Arabia vs Yemen (10,000)
2018: Myanmar army vs Rohingyas (10,000)
Arab-Israeli wars
I (1947-49): 6,373 Israeli and 15,000 Arabs die
II (1956): 231 Israeli and 3,000 Egyptians die
III (1967): 776 Israeli and 20,000 Arabs die
IV (1973): 2,688 Israeli and 18,000 Arabs die
Intifada I (1987-92): 170 Israelis and 1,000 Palestinians
Intifada II (2000-03): 700 Israelis and 2,000 Palestinians
Israel-Hamas war (2008): 1,300 Palestinians
This just scratching the surface.
I know my taking bong rips and playing video games is a direct threat to your friends and family.
The AG said it was a legitimate investigation carried out professionally by a highly respected Republican. Stop acting like this was a political witch hunt.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stumplicker
This was and still is a political witch hunt, just like Kavanaugh. Especially if idiots like you keep screaming "COLLUSION! COLLUSION! COLLUSION!" now that the report is finished and states that there was no evidence of collusion.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
The investigative lens should now be pointed the other direction to examine the motives of those who called for the investigation. If that happened in all cases of false accusation, there would be a lot fewer accusations. Especially ones used for political points.
Mueller could not conclusively find obstruction because he could not conclusively find collusion.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Protect the interests of the people from who exactly?Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Got to crack a few eggs to make an omelette, amirite?Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
This is what I mean about everyone needing protection from crazy misguided idiots like you. You think government is the cause of all that when really its capitalism to blame. Specifically the oil, defense industry, pharmaceutical, and bank barons.
Actually, they ran negative ads for Trump and negative ads for Clinton.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Just because Trump won doesn't mean it was in Trump's favor.
So.. no collusion.Quote:
Since Mueller could not prove a link between Trump or his people and the Russian campaign to interfere in the election Mueller then could not substantiate the charge of obstruction by Trump.
Weird.
At least you are "man" enough to almost admit it.
You're unbelievably stupid.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
https://media.giphy.com/media/2Tn10AXN6B98k/giphy.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by Back
Dude, those were 2 unrelated things.
You're the champion.. you don't have to out dumb Androidpk2019 in this thread.
You make him come to you.
God damn.. I'm running out of "The Most Retarded Things Posted by the Most Retarded People" signature lines.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Well, you're not exactly known around here for your powers of deduction, but hacking the DNC wasn't to help Clinton.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Did you read the AG's report yourself?Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Capitalism is a system of corruption without regard to ethics or morals, that devours natural resources, takes advantage of natural human familial instinct, and enslaves the population while forcing them to be consumers of its ill-gotten products, so that the very few can think they are better than the rest.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
You. Are. Full. Of. Shit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
The obstruction of justice charge had NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH RUSSIAN COLLUSION.
Jesus. H. Mother. Fucking. Christ.
Stop being dumber than Androidpk just for fun.
Why are you flipping out? Read the AG's report for yourself.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-47675576
I'm quoting the relevant part here...
I don't see what the big deal is.Quote:
In making this determination, we noted that the Special Counsel recognized that "the evidence does not establish that the President was involved in an underlying crime related to Russian election interference," and that, while not determinative, the absence of such evidence bears upon the President's intent with respect to obstruction.
Dude.. as the champion of all that is retarded.. you should at least have SOME self awareness.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Stop being stupid.
All 4 pages. Did your mommy read it to you?Quote:
Did you read the AG's report yourself?
Tell us which economic system is proven to be better.Quote:
Capitalism is a system of corruption without regard to ethics or morals, that devours natural resources, takes advantage of natural human familial instinct, and enslaves the population while forcing them to be consumers of its ill-gotten products, so that the very few can think they are better than the rest.
Please say Socialism. Or Communism.
Because that level of stupidity is so rare.
Because you are sounding like Androidpk and trying to claim that Mueller did not exonerate Trump from the Russia collusion charge, which he did.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
It makes a big difference who is doing the exonerating here. Mueller, the independent counsel, exonerated him for that, not Barr, the AG Trump himself appointed.
So you need to stop confusing yourself and simply read my posts for what they say instead of trying to find conspiracies in them like a radicalized nut-case.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Like I said you aren't known around here for your intellect.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
So, which economic system is proven to be better than Capitalism?Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
And give us some specific examples.
Come on Backlash.. don't be a gigantic pussy and answer a very simple question.
Did the Mueller investigation exonerate Donald Trump for collusion with Russia or not?Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
You would know the answer to that question if you had read the AG's summary*. I don't know why you keep asking me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Per the report...
I guess if you want to play semantic games you could say the AG's summary does not explicitly say Trump was exonerated from collusion.Quote:
But as noted above, the Special Counsel did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple offers from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.
You're a huge retard. Get some education. Did you even graduate high school?Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Please elaborate on how it’s all capitalism’s fault.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Then elaborate why you don’t move to Canada or something if we’re such an evil greedy capitalistic society that you hate so much except for when someone who is also retarded occasionally agrees with you.
Tell us what makes Venezuela great.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Here I am, taking my valuable time trying to help these guys either understand what they read, or explain to them what they did not read, and all I get is crap for it. Geez.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrathbringer
Let me guess - you are?Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Please respond. This is a serious question.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
So, you can't back up your bullshit.
I'm not surprised.
At all.
https://media.giphy.com/media/wIxBzHWegpOUM/giphy.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by Back
https://media.giphy.com/media/xT9IgK...YTeM/giphy.gif
https://media.giphy.com/media/4MSmydoaxjAju/giphy.gif
I know the written word confuses you... but holy shit...
That would be a discussion that could carry on for a long time but the gist of it is capitalism is a system with no moral or ethical boundaries where the acquisition of capital is concerned. The government is the common population's only defense against a system that left unchecked would eventually consume everyone and everything for the benefit of the very few.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
I was born here, asshole. This is my home, I love it for the most part, and last I checked it was a democracy so I also have the right to vote and have a say in how this country is governed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
The old whataboutism. You are nothing more than a meme regurgitation machine. Ask an Alaskan if they like their state oil revenue checks and get back to me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
You are the one that said it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Wrong. And you're stupid.Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Sounds like socialism. Strange. Also, there are tons of private individuals here who are rich and successful that came up from nothing, and everyone here has the opportunity to do the same. It's not the successful people's fault that it usually requires brains, motivation, and some risk and that most people are too stupid and/or lazy and/or just had shitty ideas that didn't work out. Weird.Quote:
a system that left unchecked would eventually consume everyone and everything for the benefit of the very few.
https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/...opWhining.jpegQuote:
I was born here, asshole. This is my home, I love it for the most part, and last I checked it was a democracy so I also have the right to vote and have a say in how this country is governed.
How is it whataboutism when you're one of those retards who thinks socialism is what the US needs and the effects of it are happening in Venezuela right in front of your face?Quote:
The old whataboutism. You are nothing more than a meme regurgitation machine. Ask an Alaskan if they like their state oil revenue checks and get back to me.
I'm looking for confirmation from you. Please assist.Quote:
You are the one that said it.
Back is almost verbatim quoting Ayn Rand. He's trolling the fuck out of you guys.
Should qualify... it's either this thread or another that he's doing that. Either way... he's quoting Ayn Rand...
Fucking brilliant. How you aren't a millionaire or president I'll never know. Oh, wait...Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Lots of good points to discuss here. Thats why I said it would take a long discussion to hash it all out.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Are people really stupid and lazy if they aren't millionaires? Of course not. But the meritocratic aspect of capitalism tells us that only those with the most are "good" ones and everyone else is a loser.
We're conditioned or indoctrinated into this life by the people who were indoctrinated into it before us. The mega rich ensure their dominance by playing with our self-images while feeding us rhetoric designed to demoralize those who aren't lucky enough to strike it rich or be born into established wealth strongholds.
Those in power are pitting us against each other as a distraction while they sit on thrones built from our blood, sweat, and tears. Any discourse against the system gets shut down by the powerful and those who buy into their propaganda. Take for example the oil companies who back in the 50s knew the shit they sold polluted the air but carried on making profits while successfully waging a disinformation campaign to obfuscate the issue to keep collecting revenues regardless of the harm it caused to the Earth and the population.
We can go on and on.
I'd vote for him.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
The US already has many socialist elements you enjoy on a daily basis. There are many examples all over the place but one in particular that most people don't realize is that residents of Alaska all receive state oil revenue checks.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Can't help people who can't help themselves.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
That would require a small amount of intelligence in him.. and after 14 years, I have yet to see ANY evidence of such a "skill".Quote:
Originally Posted by Suppa Hobbit Mage
Who made that comment? Strawman much?Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
You being a poor schlub isn't what makes you a loser. It's everything about you.Quote:
But the meritocratic aspect of capitalism tells us that only those with the most are "good" ones and everyone else is a loser.
Hopefully, you do go on and on. I'm off tomorrow and it's Drunk Tuesday.Quote:
We're conditioned or indoctrinated into this life by the people who were indoctrinated into it before us. The mega rich ensure their dominance by playing with our self-images while feeding us rhetoric designed to demoralize those who aren't lucky enough to strike it rich or be born into established wealth strongholds.
Those in power are pitting us against each other as a distraction while they sit on thrones built from our blood, sweat, and tears. Any discourse against the system gets shut down by the powerful and those who buy into their propaganda. Take for example the oil companies who back in the 50s knew the shit they sold polluted the air but carried on making profits while successfully waging a disinformation campaign to obfuscate the issue to keep collecting revenues regardless of the harm it caused to the Earth and the population.
We can go on and on.
I even made your very own thread where you can discuss the intricacies of economics and how you believe capitalism is so evil. Please, don't let us down.
I'd inform you that he can never be President.. but when would facts stand in your way...Quote:
I'd vote for him.
Why haven't you moved to Alaska yet then? Sounds perfect for you!Quote:
The US already has many socialist elements you enjoy on a daily basis. There are many examples all over the place but one in particular that most people don't realize is that residents of Alaska all receive state oil revenue checks.
I'm 100K shy of being a millionaire and I'm lazy and stupid, proving nothing.
You are part of the problem. See, you took Backlash's "fair" share.Quote:
Originally Posted by Suppa Hobbit Mage
It was impossible for him to be successful and normal.
Thanks a lot.
Hm, no. Never read any of her books actually. Maybe I should.Quote:
Originally Posted by Suppa Hobbit Mage
I don't think they have pictures :(Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Heh. I just scared the shit out of my dogs laughing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Where do you think the world would be technologically if capitalism never existed compared to where we are now?Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
The coolest inventions come from warQuote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Microwaves, tampons, canned food... yeah boiiii.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
And stealth tampon bombers.Quote:
Originally Posted by Suppa Hobbit Mage
I'm going to tell my wife that tampons are because of war, and you're welcome.
Holy shit. Also a result of wartime science? The sun lamp, or what is commonly known today as a tanning booth. You're welcome, Trump.
OMG. Soy sausages.
Soy sausages were invented by Konrad Adenauer, the first German chancellor after World War Two.
Germany is responsible for soy boys with man buns.
Man, we fucked Germany up.Quote:
Originally Posted by Suppa Hobbit Mage
Where do you think the world would be technologically if war never existed compared to where we are now?Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
Let us know what she says.Quote:
Originally Posted by Suppa Hobbit Mage
According to my secret anonymous source, tampons were invented by the patriarchy as a way to tell women to go fuck themselves while they're bleeding because sexism.
Wars push people to advance at a much faster pace than peacetime. It also advances the shit out of medical sciences.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
Would we have Half-Life 3 if there was more war?Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
We would have half life vrQuote:
Originally Posted by Methais
I don't believe anything is that powerful.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
So there was no war before oil or capitalism? You do know the communist soviets murdered far more people than the NAZI's ever did? Of course they were both forms of socialism...............................Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
you made it too small.
https://thenypost.files.wordpress.co...=all&strip=all
Among the thousands of other technologies war brought, pretty much the whole space program came out of Nazi Germany suspecting that maybe they could skip a missile across the top of the atmosphere to reach the other side of the planet. More notoriously they also performed a lot of medical experiments on less than consentual people that advanced medical science quite a bit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
Quote:
Originally Posted by Back
Which system do you feel is better than capitalism? Please give an example of a country that's done it properly.
Note: Answer with the knowledge that you're bringing a water balloon to a gunfight.
I'm surprised Androidpk hasn't talked about this story yet:
Trump entertains Russian hockey player and Putin ally in the White House
Quote:
It has only been a few short days since Attorney General Bill Barr released his summary of the special counsel’s report about Russia interference into the 2016 election, and President Donald Trump is already entertaining “prominent” Russians at the White House.
The Washington Capitals were honored at the White House for winning the 2018 Stanley Cup Championship. While some members of the team declined the visit due to values, some members still attended such as Alex Ovechkin.
“Alex Ovechkin, the team’s Russian captain, and the National Hockey League’s most valuable player, who is also a vocal admirer and personal friend of President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia,” a report from The Washington Post said.
Ovechkin’s connection to Putin has been questioned.
“Mr. Ovechkin had said he is an apolitical sports star. But questions about his connections to Mr. Putin, and whether he is a participant, knowingly or unknowingly, in a Kremlin propaganda machine, have swirled around his career. They peaked when Mr. Ovechkin announced last year the creation of a ‘civic movement’ that he branded online as #putinteam, ahead of Russia’s elections,” the report said.
The Times added that Ovechkin has his own relationship with Putin.
“Mr. Ovechkin, who received a wedding gift from Mr. Putin and reportedly has his personal phone number, insisted that the hashtag and the campaign were simply his own project, involving no input or signoff from Mr. Putin’s government. There were questions, however, about whether a public relations firm with Kremlin connections was involved,” the report said.
However, the story noted that even with the strange optics of the day, the “great pressure” was relieved from Trump since Barr released his findings of the Mueller report.
OMG WHY ISN'T A NEW INVESTIGATION OPENED ALREADY OMG OMG OMG OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
So far, this is the best evidence yet of collusion.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Someone call Mueller back in.
Sadly, it's impossible that we would see what would be the best likely championship matchup between Kristol and Madcow.Quote:
Originally Posted by Suppa Hobbit Mage
It could be the semi-final match. There are a lot of playoffs where the semi-finals are the real matches and the final is a snoozer that was preordained to suck several rounds deep in the field.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neveragain
Mueller report 'undoubtedly' proves conspiracy, obstruction: Judge Napolitano
The Mueller probe may not be over just yet. Judge Andrew Napolitano said there positively "some" proof of Trump-Russia conspiracy and obstruction of justice in the 700 page report.
“In the 700 page summary of the 2 million pages of raw evidence there is undoubtedly some evidence of a conspiracy and some evidence of obstruction of justice,” he told FOX Business’ Neil Cavuto Opens a New Window. . “Just not enough evidence.”
Judge Napolitano said that prosecutors ethically are not able to bring charges unless they can prove it without a reasonable doubt. But Attorney General William Barr never indicated it.
“So once the 700 pages comes out, and this is my criticism of the Attorney General, he shouldn’t have even tipped his hands on this… the Democrats Opens a New Window. will have and other Trump opponents will have a field day with what is in there,” he said. “If there were no evidence of conspiracy and no evidence of obstruction the attorney general would have told us so—he didn’t.”
Judge Napolitano said regarding the conspiracy charges, there is not enough to prove guilt. However it gets a little murky when it comes to obstruction.
"Mueller did what a lot of prosecutors do-- they take it upstairs—let the boss decide this," he said. "The evidence is equivocal. So there is evidence of obstruction. There is evidence of no obstruction—they are equivocal, we are going to let the boss decide them. The boss Bill Barr decided we are not prosecuting him."
Judge Napolitano said this could continue to play out for the duration of President Trump’s term.
https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics...dge-napolitano
WASHINGTON (AP) — A grand jury that was involved in special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation is “continuing robustly,” a federal prosecutor said Wednesday.
The prosecutor, David Goodhand, made the revelation during a hearing over whether court filings in the Mueller probe should be unsealed related to an unidentified foreign corporation that had refused to turn over documents to the special counsel.
Mueller officially completed his investigation when he turned over his report to Attorney General William Barr on Friday. He found no evidence that President Donald Trump’s campaign “conspired or coordinated” with Russia to influence the 2016 presidential election but reached no conclusion on whether Trump obstructed justice, according to a letter Barr sent to Congress summarizing the special counsel’s findings.
But Mueller referred some matters he discovered to U.S. attorneys’ offices. It’s not entirely clear what else a grand jury, whose dealings are generally secret under law, may be considering.
The case in court Wednesday centered on a corporation owned by a foreign government, neither of which have been identified. The corporation was held in contempt for refusing to turn over information demanded by Mueller’s investigators. The Supreme Court had rejected an appeal from the corporation on Monday, and the case is now being handled by prosecutors in Washington.
The corporation has been racking up fines of $50,000 a day for not complying with the grand jury subpoena for documents. Fines have been accruing since Jan. 15 and could total more than $3.5 million. New daily fines stop once the grand jury is discharged.
https://www.apnews.com/00c3f4de982b4ce79fafba0fced78f45
We care about his opinion?
Oh I'm sorry, should I ask if you care before I post something?Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfster
Your using opinions and trying to pass them off as fact.
Why do you even bother trying to debate the 2nd biggest retard and the #1 scumbag on these forums?Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfster
It's not worth it. Just do what everyone else does: Laugh at him and be thankful you didn't let him squat in your home.
I didn't even comment on it, so no, I'm not trying to pass it off as fact. Don't be an idiot.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfster
There's no way you aren't trolling the shit out of these forums. I refuse to believe someone can actually be as stupid as you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
No need to get pissy because I called you out for being wrong. How would Judge Nap know this was fact when as far as I know he hasn't even seen the report, like everyone else talking about it? JFCQuote:
Originally Posted by Alfster
hahahahahaha this is correct! :lol: Literally EVERYONE here thinks pk is stupid and tells him so yet he keeps posting here like a masochist. :lol: What a retard.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfster
If he stopped posting here, these forums would be far less entertaining.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrathbringer
Just read his posts and be thankful you don't know ANYONE this stupid in real life.
I didn't realize you were religious.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
and if so, will likely continue into his second term, amirite?!Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Trump is saying he will release the full and unredacted FISA warrant that was used to start the FBI's probe into his campaign which eventually led to the Russia collusion investigation.
I wonder how many Democrats screaming "RELEASE MUELLER'S REPORT!" will also be saying "We shouldn't release the unredacted FISA warrant, that would be a blow to our national security and law enforcement efforts."
I'd hope at this point both sides simply want the information. Trump says a lot, so here's hoping he's telling the truth
You must be new to PK's posts.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfster
He's been doing this for quite a long time.
http://i.imgur.com/rwnkEEJ.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by Alfster
https://media.giphy.com/media/3ohc19...YQgg/giphy.gif
I still remember how he said he really really wanted to release his tax returns but he couldn't because the IRS was auditing them. :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfster
Just when I thought the GOP couldn't sink any lower they go and ask Schiff to resign over Russiagate. GTFO with that bullshit.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1wMM-ypDjEhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1wMM-ypDjE
Yesterday Trump called on Russia to withdraw all of their troops from Venezuela. So I guess now the far left loves Russia?
The tgo drinking game: Take a shot every time he mentions the far left (that he still can't identify without flip flopping on what he means by it.)
This is correct.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
I think people should be held accountable for the things they say, especially Congress. Like with Harry Reid said he lied intentionally about Romney, they should have thrown him out on his ass. Talk about influencing an election, right?Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
But again, we all know that the republican standard for civility is much higher than democrats, so these things will never happen.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suppa Hobbit Mage
Nice trolling.
Remember how all those leftist idiots like you demanded that Trump resign over beating Hillary and winning the election though?Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Now, now.. Androidpk is a centerist moderate.Quote:
Originally Posted by Methais
In 2015 he was for Rand Paul and was alt-right.
In 2016 he was for Bernie Sanders and was alt-left.
And in the middle is the center.
It's simple geometry really.
https://media3.giphy.com/media/k6VlCKhJHGIOQ/giphy.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Barr says the entire Mueller report with redactions will be available by mid-April. He's also not allowing Trump to go over it first to redact things using his executive privilege.
I wonder if we're going to have meltdown 2.0 when this happens or if the media is going to find a redacted comma they don't like and scream "RIGHT THERE! COLLUSION PROVEN!!!"
Both of these things will happen.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Knew nothing would come of this shitshow. Can't wait to vote Trump in 2020. Muslims for Trump!
Subpoena for Mueller Report and Documents Approved by House Judiciary Committee
The House Judiciary Committee authorized its chairman on Wednesday to use a subpoena to try to force the Justice Department to give Congress a full copy of Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s report and all of the underlying evidence used to reach his conclusions.
The chairman, Representative Jerrold Nadler of New York, said he would not immediately issue the subpoena. But the party-line vote won by Democrats who control the committee ratchets up pressure on Attorney General William P. Barr as he decides how much of the nearly 400-page report to share with lawmakers.
“I will give him time to change his mind,” Mr. Nadler said in his opening statement. “But if we cannot reach an accommodation, then we will have no choice but to issue subpoenas for these materials.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/03/u...ena-house.html
https://media3.giphy.com/media/q5LvAuRuzMj6g/giphy.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Who enforces subpoenas? Oh, right, the Executive branch. They'll get it when it is given to them.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
In b4 WAAAAAHHHHHH!!!!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
You do realize that every time you type that out and we read it.. we laugh at you.. right?Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Mueller's team is starting to leak... :popcorn:
FINALLY! IT'S HEATING UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
OMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMG THIS IS REALLY REALLY REALLY REALLY IT THIS TIME GUYS!!!!!1111111111 TRUMP AND HIS FAMILY ARE GOING TO BE JAILED AND EXECUTED IN A COUPLE WEEKS AT MOST!!!!!!!!!11111111111 I TOLD YOU SO YOU MAGABOTS BUT YOU WOULDN'T LISTEN AND NOW IT'S GOING TO START HEATING UP FOR REAL!!!!!!!!11111 JUST WAIT AND SEE!!!!!!!!111 OMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGQuote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
I see literally no major news websites reporting anything about Mueller.
I'm guessing motherjones, slate, democracy now, salon, vox? Seriously man, branch out your news threads, you are seeing exactly what google thinks you want to see.
You forgot Shareblue. I think that's where Androidpk gets most of his supposed news.Quote:
Originally Posted by Suppa Hobbit Mage
He gets it from randos on Twitter too.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/03/u...er-report.htmlQuote:
Originally Posted by Suppa Hobbit Mage
I stand corrected. I do not read the nytimes and it's buried on Reuters where I get most my news. Searching for Mueller leaks does result in a ton of the above mentioned sites, which is why I stated it.
Lots of supposition and posits. We'll see when the report is released.
You're only seeing what reuters wants you to see, you need to break out of that bubble you're trapped in.
The Washington Post has backed up the New York Times report from late Wednesday that some members of Robert Mueller’s team have said the special counsel report is much worse for the president than was suggested by Attorney General William Barr. In its report, the Post goes a step further, claiming some members of Mueller’s team have complained to close associates that they gathered “alarming and significant” evidence of obstruction by President Trump.
.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Posting news != grasping at straws but keep being that edgy troll and maybe the other shitbags will finally accept you!Quote:
Originally Posted by Stumplicker
Posting news generally involves a link. To actual news. You posting bullshit in a desperate attempt to convince yourself you weren't wrong for the past several years is not a source of news. To anyone.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
I already posted the link to the NY Times story. Try again, loser.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stumplicker
I don't need to try anything. The facts have fallen exactly as I and everyone but you said they would months/years ago. You're the one who's been shown to be the polar opposite of correct about every opinion you've expressed here. And you're now grasping at straws in a desperate attempt to convince yourself that you weren't wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Spoiler alert: You were, and you will be about whatever flawed opinion you attach yourself to next.
It isn't my opinion that the Mueller team is contradicting Barr's false summary. The only one grasping for anything is you, who once again, is incredibly butthurt that I'm posting stuff about the Russia investigation. Go cry to someone that gives an actual fuck about what YOU think. :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Stumplicker
No thanks. I'll continue to point out the flaws in every one of your opinions until you realize that your entire decision-making paradigm is hamstrung by the fact that you have no brain. You are the dumbest human being on the planet.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Edit to add: And while we're at it, you fucking idiot, here's the first sentence of the last "news" you posted:
" Some of Robert S. Mueller III’s investigators have told associates that Attorney General William P. Barr"
An article not sourced from Mueller. Not sourced from Barr. Not sourced from Mueller's investigators. Sourced from "associates of investigators". You're literally posting unnamed fourth-hand rumors from people who weren't even involved in the investigation at this point because the first, second, and third hand all say you were wrong.
And I'll continue to laugh over what a salty bitch you become every time you cry about my posts because they hurt your feelings. Fucking moron :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Stumplicker
It's time to put Androidpk on ignore. He's not here to debate, he's just here to troll.
This is correct.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
This is also correct.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stumplicker
Hey... does Strzok and Page count as part of the Mueller investigation and potential unnamed sources? Asking for a friend.
LOLOLOLOLtheironyinthisoneLOLOLOLOLQuote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Very highly unlikely considering Page was never part of the team as far as I know and Strzok was removed way back when it first started up. I can't see NYT getting quotes from him and labeling him as a member of the team.Quote:
Originally Posted by Suppa Hobbit Mage
This is correct.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
But surely he knows them, which is what I thought I read... sources who know the investigators.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
But he's a centrist remember!??!!??!?!?Quote:
Originally Posted by Suppa Hobbit Mage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stumplicker
Here's the real link, because PK is a lying scumbag like always :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
https://www.thedailybeast.com/muelle...ashington-post
https://i.imgur.com/JMPlh0e.png
Weird how you never link your source when it's some fringe site like dailybeast. Why is that?
Fucking dumbass. Get a job and do something besides being a butthurt blue waffle twat 24/7. :lol:
Androidpk STILL getting his "news" from The Daily Beast? And this guy laughs at others for listening to Alex Jones, even though I don't think anyone here ever said they take Alex Jones seriously.
PK takes The Daily Beast very seriously.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
Because he's a huge retard.
So.. unnamed sources... again...Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Dude, we've had this discussion before....
And even your source... read the first fucking line:
Some of Robert S. Mueller III’s investigators have told associates that
So.. it's not members of the Mueller team... it's people who heard from people on the Mueller team.
Dude.. you really need to get off the couch you are currently squatting...
Jesus.....Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
https://media.giphy.com/media/121dCll6tJ9o76/giphy.gif
It's not trolling if you literally believe the shit you are posting.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tgo01
He's just really, REALLY stupid.
Someone say JESUS
https://i.imgur.com/yEqhMSx.jpg
How dare you question the integrity of a site like The Daily Beast.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
PK is a CENTRIST. He would never use a site like that and present it as real news...
Looks like the REAL investigation is FINALLY heating up:
Barr says he thinks spying occurred on 2016 Trump campaign
WASHINGTON, April 10 (Reuters) - Attorney General William Barr said on Wednesday U.S. intelligence agencies engaged in spying directed at the 2016 presidential campaign of Donald Trump and that he would look at whether the surveillance was undertaken legally.
"I think spying did occur," Barr told a Senate hearing. "But the question is whether it was adequately predicated and I am not suggesting that it wasn't adequately predicated. ... I am not suggesting those rules were violated, but I think it is important to look at that. And I am not talking about the FBI necessarily, but intelligence agencies more broadly.
"I think spying on a political campaign is a big deal - it's a big deal."
http://news.trust.org/item/20190410144125-laelo
He will soon suicide himself twice in the back of the head.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkbandit
Yah - I'd say that's a big deal if it was spied on. Is Barr referring to the NSA or something? His wording seems odd, but it's certainly something that should be investigated.
This is just Trump complaining that he was legitimately investigated for crimes he committed. Just one more instance of Trump abusing the office of the presidency.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfster
Except it isn't Trump saying it so...Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
The Obama Administration was spying on the Trump campaign. Barr is saying that if this was a legitimate security concern, then that's one thing. If it's for political reasons, then that should be further investigated and the people responsible for it brought to justice.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfster
Given that Mueller found no evidence of Trump being a Russian spy as some really, really stupid people here believe (... Androidpk...) then the why and how of such an investigation should be investigated.
It's Trump saying it through his AG mouthpiece.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelston
Ahh. Okay. As far as I'm concerned...we did investigate Russia and need to investigate allegations that came from it, including spying. Just like all the shit handed off to various agencies, shouldnt matter Democrat or republican.
You really are invested in this. Hilarious.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Or you know, the Mueller report could be handed over to Congress in its unredacted form like it should have been done already.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfster
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfster
Because I'm stating the obvious? Okay.
I'm sure there's things in there. What's not in there is collusion with the Russian government and Trump.
As long as they are criminal investigations and not political investigations.. you and I are on the same page.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfster
I think we can agree that this Russian collusion was bullshit from the start and was painstakingly proven to be so via the Mueller investigation. Now.. let's get back to who knew about the spying on the Trump campaign and what evidence was presented to allow the investigation.
If it was a legitimate investigation, then so be it.
If it was nothing more than a political sting to find out what was going on in the campaign, people should be charged with the crimes they committed.
You weren't here when Androidpk2016 was going on and on and on and on and on about Hillary's emails and saying she was going to be indicted any day now.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfster
He's a bipolar 1 trick pony.. with 1 issue to vote on.
https://media.giphy.com/media/2Tn10AXN6B98k/giphy.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
Like it was obvious Trump was colluding with Russia and that it was already proven in court?Quote:
Because I'm stating the obvious? Okay.
Yea... you might want to sit this one out.
Obviously. It's why Barr ignored Mueller's summary for Congress and is dragging his feet on releasing the report.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfster