So, no then.Quote:
Originally Posted by Taernath
Printable View
So, no then.Quote:
Originally Posted by Taernath
So.. you self identify with Drax? Or does it only include pictures.. not gifs or videos? You should write down all these retarded rules so you don't get yourself confused even more than normal.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashliana
You really deserve a title shot after this level of stupidity. You know I'm rooting for you.
Too bad only one of us is still upset by the election results.Quote:
In so close an election, basically any factor could've thrown it. Sure, nominating someone else could've done the job (I voted for Bernie's nomination), but then again, conspiring with a foreign adversary privately and publicly probably also did the trick. Too bad only one of us cares about it. Guess you'll just have to watch as those convictions keep coming in. :)
I got EXACTLY what I wanted from that election: 2 SCOTUS appointments and a lifetime of tears, drama and entertainment.
I couldn't be happier.
Quote:
Fox News legal analyst Andrew Napolitano said Thursday that special counsel Robert Mueller
knows President Trump's tweets are a "treasure trove" for his probe into whether the president obstructed justice.
“Mueller knows that those tweets are a treasure trove and a window into Trump’s thinking,” Napolitano said on Fox News's "Outnumbered."
Napalitano added that if any of Trump's tweets are interpreted as containing threats or rewards, then it could be viewed as witness tampering.
“Did the president send messages to people of threats, or rewards, via his tweets? People who he knew or expected would be interviewed by Bob Mueller?” Napolitano said. “And if he did, was he engaging in witness tampering?"
Good to know.
Then there's this guy. First heard this guys name yesterday on the tapes. Looks like he'll be a household name now.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-o...ury-1532622947Quote:
Allen Weisselberg, a longtime financial gatekeeper for President Donald Trump, has been subpoenaed to testify before a federal grand jury in the criminal probe of Mr. Trump’s former personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, according to people familiar with the investigation.
Cohen is reportedly confirming that Trump both knew about the Trump Tower meeting with Russia (duh) but also approved it (double duh):
It appears this information was leaked by the Trump camp.Quote:
Michael Cohen, President Donald Trump's former personal attorney, claims that then-candidate Trump knew in advance about the June 2016 meeting in Trump Tower in which Russians were expected to offer his campaign dirt on Hillary Clinton, sources with knowledge tell CNN. Cohen is willing to make that assertion to special counsel Robert Mueller, the sources said.
Cohen's claim would contradict repeated denials by Trump, Donald Trump Jr., their lawyers and other administration officials who have said that the President knew nothing about the Trump Tower meeting until he was approached about it by The New York Times in July 2017.
Cohen alleges that he was present, along with several others, when Trump was informed of the Russians' offer by Trump Jr. By Cohen's account, Trump approved going ahead with the meeting with the Russians, according to sources.
So, I assume we've now officially moved from "There was no collusion!" to "Okay so there was, so what?"
Beat me to it!Quote:
Originally Posted by time4fun
Cohen's biggest bomb yet.
Wonder how Ghouliani is going to spin this one..
Let’s be real; this cohen thing is only credible if he has a tape or he’s going to tell mueller/sdny attorneys office who else was there and then they talk.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk
I do believe Cohen has lots of tapes, though. Word on the streets is 100+.
https://slate.com/technology/2018/07...udy-finds.html
Interesting article by a left leaning publication.
Yeah no doubt, I'd be cautious about trusting his word as well. But if his testimony matches up with the testimony of others who are cooperating then it doesn't bode well for team Trump.Quote:
Originally Posted by SHAFT
Does Cohen have to invent something to swing a plea deal or immunity? I'd say he has enough to get that already, without risking perjury. He'll be a witness so he is evidence of illegality in the collusion we already knew about.Quote:
Originally Posted by Androidpk